Reusability of P3 Facial Filter in a Pandemic Emergency: A 3D Analysis of Filter Microstructure with X-ray Microtomography Images after Dry Heat and UV Sterilization Procedures.
COVID-19
facial protection mask
filtering facepiece respirator
reuse of facial mask
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 03 2022
14 03 2022
Historique:
received:
27
02
2022
revised:
09
03
2022
accepted:
11
03
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
pubmed:
26
3
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our goal is to evaluate the effects of heat and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation on P3 facial respirator microstructure. P3 facial filters were exposed to dry heat and UV sterilization procedures. P3 facial filter samples underwent a standardized sterilization process based on dry heat and UV irradiation techniques. We analyzed critical parameters of internal microstructure, such as fiber thickness and porosity, before and after sterilization, using 3D data obtained with synchrotron radiation-based X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT). The analyzed filter has two inner layers called the "finer" and "coarser" layers. The "finer" layer consists of a dense fiber network, while the "coarser" layer has a less compact fiber network. Analysis of 3D images showed no statistically significant differences between the P3 filter of the controls and the dry heat/UV sterilized samples. In particular, averages fiber thickness in the finer layer of the control and the 60° dry heated and UV-irradiated sample groups was almost identical. Average fiber thickness for the coarser layer of the control and the 60° dry heated and UV-irradiated sample groups was very similar, measuring 19.33 µm (±0.47), 18.33 µm (±0.47), and 18.66 µm (±0.47), respectively. There was no substantial difference in maximum fiber thickness in the finer layers and coarser layers. For the control group samples, maximum thickness was on average 11.43 µm (±1.24) in the finer layer and 59.33 µm (±6.79) in the coarser layer. Similarly, the 60° dry heated group samples were thickened 12.2 µm (±0.21) in the finer layer and 57.33 µm (±1.24) in the coarser layer, while for the UV-irradiated group, the mean max thickness was 12.23 µm (±0.90) in the finer layer and 58.00 µm (±6.68) in the coarser layer. Theoretical porosity analysis resulted in 74% and 88% for the finer and coarser layers. The finer layers' theoretical porosity tended to decrease in dry heat and UV-irradiated samples compared with the respective control samples. Dry heat and UV sterilization processes do not substantially alter the morphometry of the P3 filter samples' internal microstructure, as studied with micro-CT. The current study suggests that safe P3 filter facepiece reusability is theoretically feasible and should be further investigated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35329123
pii: ijerph19063435
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063435
pmc: PMC8952298
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 May;47(5):1275-1280
pubmed: 32107577
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(8):509-17
pubmed: 25806411
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;15(2):233-41
pubmed: 19193267
Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Mar;53(2):117-28
pubmed: 19261695
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):676-680
pubmed: 32371934
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):33-40
pubmed: 12000561
Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Nov;53(8):815-27
pubmed: 19805391
Lancet Microbe. 2020 May;1(1):e10
pubmed: 32835322
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):
pubmed: 32491983
Biomed Environ Sci. 2003 Sep;16(3):246-55
pubmed: 14631830
Materials (Basel). 2014 Feb 10;7(2):1017-1045
pubmed: 28788497
Arch Virol. 2009;154(1):115-9
pubmed: 19039515
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018 Jun 19;8(6):
pubmed: 29921781
BMJ. 2015 Apr 09;350:h694
pubmed: 25858901
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(14):411-415
pubmed: 32271722