Scoping Review of Peer-Led Support for People Bereaved by Suicide.
bereavement
peer interventions
postvention
scoping review
suicide
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2022
15 03 2022
Historique:
received:
31
01
2022
revised:
08
03
2022
accepted:
10
03
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
pubmed:
26
3
2022
medline:
19
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Suicide bereavement support groups are a widely available format of postvention service. Although other reviews have addressed peer-led bereavement interventions, no review has focused specifically on peer-led support for people bereaved by suicide. Informed by a framework for undertaking scoping reviews, we conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches conducted in May 2021 of peer-reviewed literature in MEDLINE (EBSCO), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), EMBASE (Elsevier), AMED (EBSCO), ERIC (EBSCO), Web of Science (Core Collection), ASSIA (Proquest), and Global Index Medicus. The search was not limited by language, and all studies were included to full text screening. The search identified 10 studies conducted between 1994 and 2020 in five countries. The selected papers were subjected to quality assessment. The interventions included face-to-face groups, telephone and online groups/forums and were evaluated using a variety of methodologies, which made comparison and synthesis challenging. Thematic analysis resulted in four themes: motivation, impact, aspects of intervention which hindered/enhanced outcomes, and recommendations for the practice of peer support made by the authors. While there were methodological limitations to most studies included in this review; the studies do indicate the potential benefit of peer-led support to those bereaved through suicide. Future studies should provide a definition of 'peer' and a clear description of the intervention being evaluated. As the field matures there is a need for more rigorous evaluation of peer interventions with representative samples, studies that compare the impact of various types of peer interventions, and studies of the peer group processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35329171
pii: ijerph19063485
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063485
pmc: PMC8954346
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788
pubmed: 30496103
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Apr;49(2):529-534
pubmed: 29512876
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Dec;44(6):591-600
pubmed: 24702241
Omega (Westport). 2008;57(3):217-43
pubmed: 18837172
Death Stud. 2022;46(4):987-995
pubmed: 32716258
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;1(1):86-94
pubmed: 26360405
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;193(6):438-43
pubmed: 19043143
Omega (Westport). 2021 Mar;82(4):632-645
pubmed: 30760119
Death Stud. 2017 Nov-Dec;41(10):614-621
pubmed: 28557579
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e019472
pubmed: 29331974
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:184-189
pubmed: 34673315
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 30;70(691):e102-e110
pubmed: 31932295
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Aug 12;14:65
pubmed: 32817757
Can J Public Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;102(1):18-29
pubmed: 21485962
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):232-248
pubmed: 33720444
Death Stud. 1994 May-Jun;18(3):243-56
pubmed: 10135136
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179496
pubmed: 28644859
Death Stud. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(10):915-30
pubmed: 24482855
Omega (Westport). 2019 Nov;80(1):137-166
pubmed: 28871835
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176-84
pubmed: 17163895
Crisis. 2017 Nov;38(6):393-402
pubmed: 28793818
Death Stud. 2010 Jul;34(6):529-40
pubmed: 24482858
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):49
pubmed: 30700267
Crisis. 2014;35(1):27-35
pubmed: 24067249
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226201
pubmed: 31834902
J Ment Health. 2019 Dec;28(6):627-632
pubmed: 28682640