Fracture Behavior of Steel Slag Powder-Cement-Based Concrete with Different Steel-Slag-Powder Replacement Ratios.

concrete fracture performance replacement ratio steel-slag powder

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 25 02 2022
revised: 15 03 2022
accepted: 16 03 2022
entrez: 25 3 2022
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 26 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The influence of different replacement ratios of steel-slag powder as cement-replacement material on the fracture performance of concrete is studied in this paper. A three-point bending fracture test is carried out on slag powder-cement-based concrete (SPC)-notched beams with steel-slag powder as cementitious materials, partially replacing cement (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%). Load-deflection curves and load-crack-opening displacement curves of SPC-notched beams with five different replacement ratios of steel-slag powder were obtained. The effects of different steel-slag-powder replacement ratios on the fracture properties (fracture energy, fracture toughness, and double-K fracture parameters) of the SPC were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the incorporation of appropriate steel-slag powder can affect the fracture performance of SPC. Compared with concrete without steel-slag powder, adding appropriate steel-slag powder can effectively improve the bond performance between aggregate and matrix because the steel-slag powder contains hydration activity substances such as calcium oxide and aluminium trioxide. The fracture energy and fracture toughness of SPC increased and then decreased with the increase in steel-slag-powder replacement ratios, and the SPC concrete showed best fracture performance with a 5% steel slag powder replacement ratio. Its fracture energy increases by 13.63% and fracture toughness increases by 53.22% compared with NC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35329694
pii: ma15062243
doi: 10.3390/ma15062243
pmc: PMC8951386
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
ID : 2019A1515110808

Références

Materials (Basel). 2018 Jun 17;11(6):
pubmed: 29914191
Waste Manag. 2018 Aug;78:318-330
pubmed: 32559918
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;13(12):
pubmed: 32604757
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 02;13(17):
pubmed: 32887480

Auteurs

Ke-Xian Zhuo (KX)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Guo-Tao Liu (GT)

Guangdong GW Metal Industry Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510030, China.

Xue-Wei Lan (XW)

Guangzhou Zengcheng Zhengyuan Construction Engineering Testing Center Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511300, China.

Dong-Ping Zheng (DP)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Guangzhou Hongchang Construction Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510006, China.

Si-Quan Wu (SQ)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Guangzhou Hongchang Construction Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510006, China.

Pei-Zong Wu (PZ)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Guangzhou Hongchang Construction Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510006, China.

Yong-Chang Guo (YC)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Jia-Xiang Lin (JX)

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Classifications MeSH