Feasibility Study on the Steel-Plastic Geogrid Instead of Wire Mesh for Bolt Mesh Supporting.

bolt mesh supporting feasibility studies mesh load-bearing capacity test mesh wire tensile testing node peel test steel-plastic geogrid wire mesh

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 28 02 2022
revised: 12 03 2022
accepted: 16 03 2022
entrez: 25 3 2022
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 26 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wire mesh is a common material for bolt mesh supporting structures, but its application in engineering has revealed many defects. At the same time, with the development of new materials for civil engineering, the new material mesh performance and cost show outstanding advantages over wire mesh. In this paper, the feasibility of replacing wire mesh with steel-plastic geogrid as an alternative material is carefully studied through indoor tests and field applications. The following conclusions were drawn from a comparative analysis with wire mesh, mainly in terms of mechanical properties, engineering characteristics, and construction techniques: (1) in terms of mesh wire strength, wire mesh is slightly better than steel-plastic geogrid, but in the case of similar tensile strength, the amount of steel used per unit length of steel geogrid bars is only 36.75% of that of steel-plastic geogrid, while the tensile strength of the high-strength steel wire attached to the steel-plastic geogrid belt is about 3.3 times that of steel bars; (2) in terms of junction peel strength, both values are similar, with the injection-moulded junction being 1154.56-1224.38 N and the welded junction of 4 mm mesh being 988.35 N; (3) in terms of the strength of the mesh, steel-plastic geogrid is better than wire mesh, and with the same mesh wire strength, the bearing capacity of steel-plastic geogrid is increased by about 63.17% and the contribution of the mesh wire bearing capacity is increased by 83.66%, with the damage mainly being in the form of wire breakage in the ribbon causing ribbon failure, leading to further damage to the mesh; (4) in terms of the engineering application of steel-plastic geogrid compared to wire mesh, the utilization rate of mesh increases by about 24.99%, the construction efficiency increases by about 14.10%, and the economic benefit increases by about 45.31%. In practical application, the steel-plastic geogrid has good adhesion with surrounding rock and strong corrosion resistance. According to the above research analysis, the steel-plastic geogrid is feasible to replace the wire mesh for bolt mesh supporting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35329733
pii: ma15062281
doi: 10.3390/ma15062281
pmc: PMC8955480
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 51778351
Organisme : SDUST Research Fund
ID : 2018TDJH101

Références

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 25;671:41-51
pubmed: 30927726
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Jul 03;13(13):
pubmed: 34279349
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;14(20):
pubmed: 34683552

Auteurs

Qingbiao Wang (Q)

College of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai'an 271019, China.
College of Safety and Environmental Engineering (College of Safety and Emergency Management), Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-Founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
National Engineering Laboratory for Coalmine Backfilling Mining, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai'an 271019, China.

Dong Wang (D)

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Yue Li (Y)

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Wenxia Liu (W)

Mountain Tai Composite Industry Research Institute, Tai'an 271019, China.

Chenglin Tian (C)

College of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai'an 271019, China.

Zhenyue Shi (Z)

College of Safety and Environmental Engineering (College of Safety and Emergency Management), Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Keyong Wang (K)

College of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai'an 271019, China.
National Engineering Laboratory for Coalmine Backfilling Mining, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai'an 271019, China.

Hongxu Song (H)

College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Zhongjing Hu (Z)

College of Safety and Environmental Engineering (College of Safety and Emergency Management), Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Xu Zhang (X)

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Xunmei Liang (X)

Shandong Road New Materials Co., Ltd., Tai'an 271019, China.

Fei Tang (F)

Shandong Luda Test Instrument Co., Ltd., Tai'an 271019, China.

Xingquan Tang (X)

Shandong Luda Test Instrument Co., Ltd., Tai'an 271019, China.

Zhengyin Liu (Z)

Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250031, China.

Mingjing Zhang (M)

Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250031, China.

Classifications MeSH