Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTube
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
11
01
2022
accepted:
08
03
2022
revised:
28
02
2022
medline:
9
6
2023
pubmed:
26
3
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the quality of the information provided in YouTube
Identifiants
pubmed: 35332276
doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00557-5
pii: 10.1038/s41443-022-00557-5
pmc: PMC8942804
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
398-403Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. European association of urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health—2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80:333–57.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007
pubmed: 34183196
Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Kohri K. Prepuce: phimosis, paraphimosis, and circumcision. Sci World J. 2011;11:289–301.
doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.31
McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2007;53:445–8.
Morris BJ, Matthews JG, Krieger JN. Prevalence of phimosis in males of all ages: systematic review. Urology. 2020;135:124–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.003
pubmed: 31655079
Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Srivatsav A, Spitz A, Eisenberg ML, Thirumavalavan N, et al. A review of the evolving landscape between the consumer Internet and men’s health. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:S123–34.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.29
pubmed: 32257853
pmcid: 7108985
Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Waligóra J, Mastalerz-Migas A. The internet as a source of health information and services. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1211:1–16.
doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_396
pubmed: 31273574
Gómez Rivas J, Carrion DM, Tortolero L, Veneziano D, Esperto F, Greco F, et al. Scientific social media, a new way to expand knowledge. What do urologists need to know? Actas Urol Esp. 2019;43:269–76.
doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.12.003
pubmed: 31014549
Teoh JY-C, Ong WLK, Gonzalez-Padilla D, Castellani D, Dubin JM, Esperto F, et al. A global survey on the impact of COVID-19 on urological services. Eur Urol. 2020;78:265–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.025
pubmed: 32507625
pmcid: 7248000
Creta M, Sagnelli C, Celentano G, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Capece M, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection affects the lower urinary tract and male genital system: A systematic review. J Med Virol. 2021;93:3133–42.
YouTube for Press [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 7]. Available from: https://blog.youtube/press
Loeb S, Sengupta S, Butaney M, Macaluso JN, Czarniecki SW, Robbins R, et al. Dissemination of misinformative and biased information about prostate cancer on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2019;75:564–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.056
pubmed: 30502104
Social media demographics to inform your brand’s strategy in 2021 [Internet]. Sprout Social. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/new-social-media-demographics/
Gul M, Diri MA. YouTube as a source of information about premature ejaculation treatment. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1734–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.008
pubmed: 31522984
Fode M, Nolsøe AB, Jacobsen FM, Russo GI, Østergren PB, Jensen CFS, et al. Quality of information in YouTube videos on erectile dysfunction. Sex Med. 2020;8:408–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.05.007
pubmed: 32593674
pmcid: 7471071
Ku S, Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Srivatsav A, Gondokusumo J, Tatem AJ, et al. A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:611–5.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9
pubmed: 32541795
Szmuda T, Rosvall P, Hetzger TV, Ali S, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of patient information for hydrocephalus: a content-quality and optimization analysis. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:e469–77.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.149
pubmed: 32147561
Ward M, Ward B, Abraham M, Nicheporuck A, Elkattawy O, Herschman Y, et al. The educational quality of neurosurgical resources on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e660–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.184
pubmed: 31276855
Gerundo G, Collà Ruvolo C, Puzone B, Califano G, La Rocca R, Parisi V, et al. Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50:300–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.013
pubmed: 34843859
Megaly M, Khalil C, Tadros B, Tawadros M. Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos for patients with coeliac disease. Int J Celiac Dis. 2016;4:102–4.
The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and User’s Guide. :67.
Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96:395–403.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027
pubmed: 24973195
pmcid: 5085258
Betschart P, Pratsinis M, Müllhaupt G, Rechner R, Herrmann TR, Gratzke C, et al. Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading: Surgical treatment of BPH on YouTube. BJU Int. 2020;125:595–601.
doi: 10.1111/bju.14971
pubmed: 31834973
Phimosis - Patient Information [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 5]. Available from: https://patients.uroweb.org/other-diseases/phimosis/
Natali A, Rossetti MA. Complications of self‐circumcision: a case report and proposal. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2970–2.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00858.x
pubmed: 18466267
Kintu-Luwaga R. The emerging trend of self-circumcision and the need to define cause: Case report of a 21 year-old male. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;25:225–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.06.011
pubmed: 27399167
pmcid: 4941114
Ettanji A, Bencherki Y, Wichou EM, Dakir M, Debbagh A, Aboutaieb R. Foreskin necrosis – Complication following self-circumcision. Urol Case Rep. 2021;38:101671.
doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101671
pubmed: 33898266
pmcid: 8058521
Montes Cardona CE, García-Perdomo HA. Incidence of penile cancer worldwide: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2017;41:e117.
pubmed: 31384255
pmcid: 6645409
Survival Rates for Penile Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/penile-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html .
Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, Tobias-Machado M, Tran ATH, Van Rompuy A-S, et al. Penile cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2021;7:11.
doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00246-5
pubmed: 33574340
Salama A, Panoch J, Bandali E, Carroll A, Wiehe S, Downs S, et al. Consulting “Dr. YouTube”: an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:70.e1–e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.011
pubmed: 31928900
Rubel KE, Alwani MM, Nwosu OI, Bandali EH, Shipchandler TZ, Illing EA, et al. Understandability and actionability of audiovisual patient education materials on sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10:564–71.
doi: 10.1002/alr.22518
pubmed: 31930714
Duran MB, Kizilkan Y. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube. Andrologia. 2021 ;53:e14118.
doi: 10.1111/and.14118
pubmed: 34009641
Pratsinis M, Abt D, Müllhaupt G, Langenauer J, Knoll T, Schmid H-P, et al. Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube. World J Urol. 2021;39:935–42.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03236-6
pubmed: 32468108
Capece M, Di Giovanni A, Cirigliano L, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Creta M, et al. YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis. Andrologia. 2022;54:e14246.
doi: 10.1111/and.14246
pubmed: 34519075
Melchionna A, Collà Ruvolo C, Capece M, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. Testicular pain and youtube
Morra S, Collà Ruvolo C, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. YouTubeTM as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41:237–45.
doi: 10.1002/nau.24802
pubmed: 34559920
Baydilli N, Selvi I. Is social media reliable as a source of information on peyronie’s disease treatment? Int J Impot Res. 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00454-3 . Online ahead of print.
Brimley S, Natale C, Dick B, Pastuszak A, Khera M, Baum N, et al. The emerging critical role of telemedicine in the urology clinic: a practical guide. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9:289–95.