Boosting targeted genome editing using the hei-tag.
CRISPR
Cas
Oryzias latipes
base editing
genetics
genomics
mouse
nuclear localization
oryzias latipes
targeted genome editing
zebrafish
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 03 2022
25 03 2022
Historique:
received:
22
05
2021
accepted:
15
03
2022
pubmed:
26
3
2022
medline:
7
5
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Precise, targeted genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 is key for basic research and translational approaches in model and non-model systems. While active in all species tested so far, editing efficiencies still leave room for improvement. The bacterial Cas9 needs to be efficiently shuttled into the nucleus as attempted by fusion with nuclear localization signals (NLSs). Additional peptide tags such as FLAG- or myc-tags are usually added for immediate detection or straightforward purification. Immediate activity is usually granted by administration of preassembled protein/RNA complexes. We present the 'hei-tag ( The genetic code stored within DNA provides cells with the instructions they need to carry out their role in the body. Any changes to these genes, or the DNA sequence around them, has the potential to completely alter how a cell behaves. Scientists have developed various tools that allow them to experimentally modify the genome of cells or even entire living organisms. This includes the popular Cas9 enzyme which cuts DNA at specific sites, and base editors which can precisely change bits of genetic code without cutting DNA. While there are lots of Cas9 enzymes and base editors currently available, these often differ greatly in their activity depending on which cell type or organism they are applied to. Finding a tool that can effectively modify the genome of an organism at the right time during development also poses a challenge. All the cells in an organism arise from a single fertilized cell. If this cell is genetically edited, all its subsequent daughter cells (which make up the entire organism) will contain the genetic modification. However, most genome editing tools only work efficiently later in development, resulting in an undesirable mosaic organism composed of both edited and non-edited cells. Here, Thumberger et al. have developed a new ‘high efficiency-tag’ (also known as hei-tag for short) that can enhance the activity of gene editing tools and overcome this barrier. The tag improves the efficiency of gene editing by immediately shuttling a Cas9 enzyme to the nucleus, the cellular compartment that stores DNA. In all cases, gene editing tools with hei-tag worked better than those without in fish embryos and mouse cells grown in the laboratory. When Cas9 enzymes connected to a hei-tag were injected into the first fertilized cell of a fish embryo, this resulted in an even distribution of edited genes spread throughout the whole organism. To understand how a gene affects an organism, researchers need to be able to edit it as early in development as possible. Attaching the ‘hei-tag’ to already available tools could help boost their activity and make them more efficient. It could also allow advances in medical research aimed at replacing faulty genes with fully functioning ones.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
The genetic code stored within DNA provides cells with the instructions they need to carry out their role in the body. Any changes to these genes, or the DNA sequence around them, has the potential to completely alter how a cell behaves. Scientists have developed various tools that allow them to experimentally modify the genome of cells or even entire living organisms. This includes the popular Cas9 enzyme which cuts DNA at specific sites, and base editors which can precisely change bits of genetic code without cutting DNA. While there are lots of Cas9 enzymes and base editors currently available, these often differ greatly in their activity depending on which cell type or organism they are applied to. Finding a tool that can effectively modify the genome of an organism at the right time during development also poses a challenge. All the cells in an organism arise from a single fertilized cell. If this cell is genetically edited, all its subsequent daughter cells (which make up the entire organism) will contain the genetic modification. However, most genome editing tools only work efficiently later in development, resulting in an undesirable mosaic organism composed of both edited and non-edited cells. Here, Thumberger et al. have developed a new ‘high efficiency-tag’ (also known as hei-tag for short) that can enhance the activity of gene editing tools and overcome this barrier. The tag improves the efficiency of gene editing by immediately shuttling a Cas9 enzyme to the nucleus, the cellular compartment that stores DNA. In all cases, gene editing tools with hei-tag worked better than those without in fish embryos and mouse cells grown in the laboratory. When Cas9 enzymes connected to a hei-tag were injected into the first fertilized cell of a fish embryo, this resulted in an even distribution of edited genes spread throughout the whole organism. To understand how a gene affects an organism, researchers need to be able to edit it as early in development as possible. Attaching the ‘hei-tag’ to already available tools could help boost their activity and make them more efficient. It could also allow advances in medical research aimed at replacing faulty genes with fully functioning ones.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35333175
doi: 10.7554/eLife.70558
pii: 70558
pmc: PMC9068219
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Nuclear Localization Signals
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Cytosine
8J337D1HZY
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Thumberger et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
TT, TT, JG, JW patent application pending (EP21166099.8) related to the findings described, AC, RM, BW, MF No competing interests declared
Références
Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499-509
pubmed: 6096007
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):227-9
pubmed: 23360964
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Dec 16;42(22):e168
pubmed: 25300484
Dev Growth Differ. 2016 Dec;58(9):679-687
pubmed: 27759163
Sci Adv. 2017 Aug 30;3(8):eaao4774
pubmed: 28875174
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):2121
pubmed: 33837189
Development. 1997 Aug;124(16):3147-56
pubmed: 9272955
CRISPR J. 2022 Feb;5(1):123-130
pubmed: 35119294
Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 1;8(11):1311-23
pubmed: 7926732
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jul;38(7):824-844
pubmed: 32572269
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110(34):13904-9
pubmed: 23918387
Dev Cell. 2018 Jul 2;46(1):112-125.e4
pubmed: 29974860
Dev Dyn. 1995 Jul;203(3):253-310
pubmed: 8589427
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0212956
pubmed: 30845151
J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):841-9
pubmed: 3417784
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;37(3):224-226
pubmed: 30809026
Elife. 2021 Jan 08;10:
pubmed: 33416493
J Biotechnol. 2014 Nov 10;189:1-8
pubmed: 25193712
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Mech Dev. 2004 Jul;121(7-8):629-37
pubmed: 15210172
Elife. 2021 Feb 12;10:
pubmed: 33576334
BMC Biol. 2020 Dec 3;18(1):190
pubmed: 33272268
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 07;8(10):e76117
pubmed: 24116091
Elife. 2022 Apr 04;11:
pubmed: 35373735
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 24;22(7):
pubmed: 33805113
Cells. 2020 Jul 14;9(7):
pubmed: 32674364
Mech Dev. 2004 Jul;121(7-8):605-18
pubmed: 15210170
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0213317
pubmed: 30835740
CRISPR J. 2018 Jun;1:239-250
pubmed: 31021262
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23
pubmed: 23287718
Elife. 2021 Jul 12;10:
pubmed: 34252023
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124633
pubmed: 25909470
Elife. 2018 Aug 29;7:
pubmed: 30156184
Traffic. 2005 Mar;6(3):173-86
pubmed: 15702986
Front Genome Ed. 2021 Jan 28;3:618406
pubmed: 34713251