Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Scleral Lens Wear in Penetrating Keratoplasty and Keratoconus.


Journal

Eye & contact lens
ISSN: 1542-233X
Titre abrégé: Eye Contact Lens
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160941

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2022
Historique:
accepted: 11 12 2021
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 20 5 2022
entrez: 25 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in keratoconus and penetrating keratoplasty eyes before and after nonfenestrated scleral lens wear. Twenty-three participants were enrolled, and 37 eyes were included in the analysis (11 penetrating keratoplasty and 26 keratoconus). A range of corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP were measured using the CORVIS ST before and after 8 hr of nonfenestrated scleral lens wear (Keracare, Acculens, Denver, CO). Before lens wear, penetrating keratoplasty eyes displayed significantly greater median values for central corneal thickness (97 μm thicker, P=0.02), IOP (3.89 mm Hg higher, P=0.01), and biomechanical parameter A2 length (0.48 mm longer, P=0.003) compared with keratoconic eyes. No significant changes in corneal biomechanical parameters or IOP were observed after scleral lens wear in either group (all P>0.05). Although nonfenestrated scleral contact lenses can induce a subatmospheric pressure after lens settling and compress tissue surrounding the limbus, no significant changes were detected in the corneal biomechanical parameters studied using CORVIS ST after scleral lens wear in eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and keratoconus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35333810
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000886
pii: 00140068-202205000-00004
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

206-209

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists.

Références

Vincent SJ. The rigid lens renaissance: A surge in sclerals. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41:139–143.
Woods CA, Efron N, Morgan P, et al. Are eye-care practitioners fitting scleral contact lenses? Clin Exp Optom 2020;103:449–453.
Barnett M, Courey C, Fadel D, et al. Clear—Scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021;44:270–288.
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ. Corneal changes following short-term miniscleral contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014;37:461–468.
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ. Miniscleral lens wear influences corneal curvature and optics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016;36:100–111.
Serramito-Blanco M, Carpena-Torres C, Carballo J, et al. Anterior corneal curvature and aberration changes after scleral lens wear in keratoconus patients with and without ring segments. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:141–148.
Kumar M, Shetty R, Lalgudi VG, et al. Scleral lens wear following penetrating keratoplasty: Changes in corneal curvature and optics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020;40:502–509.
Kumar M, Shetty R, Lalgudi VG, et al. The effect of scleral lenses on vision, refraction and aberrations in post-LASIK ectasia, keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021;41:664–672.
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ. The time course and nature of corneal oedema during sealed miniscleral contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019;42:49–54.
Esen F, Toker E. Influence of apical clearance on mini-scleral lens settling, clinical performance, and corneal thickness changes. Eye Contact Lens 2017;43:230–235.
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ, et al. Hypoxic corneal changes following eight hours of scleral contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93:293–299.
Kumar M, Shetty R, Khamar P, et al. Scleral lens-induced corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci 2020;97:697–702.
Ferreira-Mendes J, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Enhanced ectasia detection using corneal tomography and biomechanics. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;197:7–16.
Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19:167.
Wang J, Wang L, Li Z, et al. Corneal biomechanical evaluation after conventional corneal crosslinking with oxygen enrichment. Eye Contact Lens 2020;46:306–309.
Alonso-Caneiro D, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ. Morphological changes in the conjunctiva, episclera and sclera following short-term miniscleral contact lens wear in rigid lens neophytes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2016;39:53–61.
Consejo A, Behaegel J, Van Hoey M, et al. Scleral asymmetry as a potential predictor for scleral lens compression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018;38:609–616.
Miller D, Carroll JM, Holmberg A. Scleral lens cling measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;65:929–930.
Dhallu SK, Huarte ST, Bilkhu PS, et al. Effect of scleral lens oxygen permeability on corneal physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2020;97:669–675.
Montalt JC, Porcar E, España-Gregori E, et al. Corneal biomechanical parameters with corneoscleral contact lenses in post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. Eye Contact Lens 2018;44(Suppl 2):S65–S69.
Porcar E, Montalt JC, España-Gregori E, et al. Impact of corneoscleral contact lens usage on corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconic eyes. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:318–323.
Jiang MS, Zhu JY, Li X, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer: A meta-analysis. Cornea 2017;36:310–316.
Jedzierowska M, Koprowski R. Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: A critical review. Biomed Eng Online 2019;18:17.
Salouti R, Khalili MR, Zamani M, et al. Assessment of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol 2019;31:262–267.
Lanza M, Iaccarino S, Bifani M. In vivo human corneal deformation analysis with a Scheimpflug camera, a critical review. J Biophotonics 2016;9:464–477.
Wagner H, Barr JT, Zadnik K. Collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study: Methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:223–232.
Peyman A, Ghoreishi M, Hashemi-Estabragh SS, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties after soft contact lens wear measured on a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer: A before and after study. J Fr Ophthalmol 2021;44:391–396.
Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:616–622.
Nau CB, Schornack MM, McLaren JW, et al. Intraocular pressure after 2 hours of small-diameter scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2016;42:350–353.
Shahnazi KC, Isozaki VL, Chiu GB. Effect of scleral lens wear on central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with ocular surface disease. Eye Contact Lens 2020;46:341–347.
Kramer EG, Vincent SJ. Intraocular pressure changes in neophyte scleral lens wearers: A prospective study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020;43:609–612.
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ. Evidence on scleral contact lenses and intraocular pressure. Clin Exp Optom 2017;100:87–88.
Obinwanne CJ, Echendu DC, Agbonlahor O, et al. Changes in scleral tonometry and anterior chamber angle after short-term scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2020;97:720–725.
Fogt JS, Nau CB, Schornack M, et al. Comparison of pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry measurements of intraocular pressure during scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2020;97:711–719.
Walker MK, Pardon LP, Redfern R, et al. IOP and optic nerve head morphology during scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2020;97:661–668.
Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Wussuku Lior O, et al. Corneal collagen cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus: 3-year prospective outcome. Can J Ophthalmol 2014;49:54–59.
Jabbarvand M, Moravvej Z, Shahraki K, et al. Corneal biomechanical outcome of collagen cross-linking in keratoconic patients evaluated by Corvis ST. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31:1577–1583.
Harthan J, Nau CB, Barr J, et al. Scleral lens prescription and management practices: The scope study. Eye Contact Lens 2018;44(Suppl 1):S228–S232.
Ambrosio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg 2017;33:434–443.
Salomao MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Gomes Esporcatte LP, et al. The role of corneal biomechanics for the evaluation of ectasia patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2113.
Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: Stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:105.

Auteurs

Mukesh Kumar (M)

Narayana Nethralaya (M.K., R.S., V.G.L., A.S.R., P.K.), Bangalore, India; and Centre for Vision and Eye Research (S.J.V.), School of Optometry & Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia .

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH