Mind your step: Target walking task reveals gait disturbance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Balance control
Center of mass
Gait
Locomotion
Motor control
Spinal cord injury
Visually guided walking
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Mar 2022
25 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
03
08
2021
accepted:
15
03
2022
entrez:
26
3
2022
pubmed:
27
3
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Walking over obstacles requires precise foot placement while maintaining balance control of the center of mass (CoM) and the flexibility to adapt the gait patterns. Most individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are capable of overground walking on level ground; however, gait stability and adaptation may be compromised. CoM control was investigated during a challenging target walking (TW) task in individuals with iSCI compared to healthy controls. The hypothesis was that individuals with iSCI, when challenged with TW, show a lack of gait pattern adaptability which is reflected by an impaired adaptation of CoM movement compared to healthy controls. A single-center controlled diagnostic clinical trial with thirteen participants with iSCI (0.3-24 years post injury; one subacute and twelve chronic) and twelve healthy controls was conducted where foot and pelvis kinematics were acquired during two conditions: normal treadmill walking (NW) and visually guided target walking (TW) with handrail support, during which participants stepped onto projected virtual targets synchronized with the moving treadmill surface. Approximated CoM was calculated from pelvis markers and used to calculate CoM trajectory length and mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW (primary outcome). Nonparametric statistics, including spearman rank correlations, were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical parameter, outdoor mobility score, performance, and CoM parameters (secondary outcome). Healthy controls adapted to TW by decreasing anterior-posterior and vertical CoM trajectory length (p < 0.001), whereas participants with iSCI reduced CoM trajectory length only in the vertical direction (p = 0.002). Mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW correlated with participants' neurological level of injury (R = 0.76, p = 0.002) and CoM trajectory length (during TW) correlated with outdoor mobility score (R = - 0.64, p = 0.026). This study demonstrated that reduction of CoM movement is a common strategy to cope with TW challenge in controls, but it is impaired in individuals with iSCI. In the iSCI group, the ability to cope with gait challenges worsened the more rostral the level of injury. Thus, the TW task could be used as a gait challenge paradigm in ambulatory iSCI individuals. Trial registration Registry number/ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03343132, date of registration 2017/11/17.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Walking over obstacles requires precise foot placement while maintaining balance control of the center of mass (CoM) and the flexibility to adapt the gait patterns. Most individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are capable of overground walking on level ground; however, gait stability and adaptation may be compromised. CoM control was investigated during a challenging target walking (TW) task in individuals with iSCI compared to healthy controls. The hypothesis was that individuals with iSCI, when challenged with TW, show a lack of gait pattern adaptability which is reflected by an impaired adaptation of CoM movement compared to healthy controls.
METHODS
A single-center controlled diagnostic clinical trial with thirteen participants with iSCI (0.3-24 years post injury; one subacute and twelve chronic) and twelve healthy controls was conducted where foot and pelvis kinematics were acquired during two conditions: normal treadmill walking (NW) and visually guided target walking (TW) with handrail support, during which participants stepped onto projected virtual targets synchronized with the moving treadmill surface. Approximated CoM was calculated from pelvis markers and used to calculate CoM trajectory length and mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW (primary outcome). Nonparametric statistics, including spearman rank correlations, were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical parameter, outdoor mobility score, performance, and CoM parameters (secondary outcome).
RESULTS
Healthy controls adapted to TW by decreasing anterior-posterior and vertical CoM trajectory length (p < 0.001), whereas participants with iSCI reduced CoM trajectory length only in the vertical direction (p = 0.002). Mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW correlated with participants' neurological level of injury (R = 0.76, p = 0.002) and CoM trajectory length (during TW) correlated with outdoor mobility score (R = - 0.64, p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that reduction of CoM movement is a common strategy to cope with TW challenge in controls, but it is impaired in individuals with iSCI. In the iSCI group, the ability to cope with gait challenges worsened the more rostral the level of injury. Thus, the TW task could be used as a gait challenge paradigm in ambulatory iSCI individuals. Trial registration Registry number/ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03343132, date of registration 2017/11/17.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35337335
doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01013-7
pii: 10.1186/s12984-022-01013-7
pmc: PMC8957135
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03343132']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
36Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):842-850
pubmed: 28786305
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;41(6A):829-34
pubmed: 15685471
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 May;29(5):500-5
pubmed: 24805009
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):295-301
pubmed: 17353459
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Dec;32(6):1404-14
pubmed: 24071548
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jan;44(1):49-100
pubmed: 31834165
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 Mar;17(1):25-31
pubmed: 12645442
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):359-68
pubmed: 10382621
Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):710-4
pubmed: 17723303
Phys Ther. 2015 May;95(5):700-9
pubmed: 25524873
Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Apr;22(6):597-610
pubmed: 15063043
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 12;15(1):102
pubmed: 30419945
J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3303-8
pubmed: 18814873
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 8;114(32):E6720-E6729
pubmed: 28739912
Spinal Cord. 2019 Sep;57(9):753-762
pubmed: 31182786
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):635-8
pubmed: 8669987
J Neurotrauma. 2017 May 15;34(10):1897-1902
pubmed: 27574966
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Feb;25(1):14-9
pubmed: 25465983
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34
pubmed: 7814786
J Biomech. 2010 Jul 20;43(10):1976-82
pubmed: 20434726
Gait Posture. 2018 Jan;59:162-167
pubmed: 29031999
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):108
pubmed: 32778127
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33
pubmed: 17852230
J Biomech. 2011 Jul 7;44(10):1921-6
pubmed: 21555126
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):562-72
pubmed: 26428035
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Nov;79(11):1456-66
pubmed: 9821910
J Exp Biol. 2018 Jul 6;221(Pt 13):
pubmed: 29773683
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Aug 1;33(15):1428-35
pubmed: 26896097
Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:209-216
pubmed: 29277059
J Biomech. 2006;39(3):444-52
pubmed: 16389084
Gait Posture. 2005 Feb;21(2):146-56
pubmed: 15639393
Gait Posture. 2011 Mar;33(3):406-11
pubmed: 21211977
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Aug 28;16(1):107
pubmed: 31455357
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jan;28(1):1-9
pubmed: 23201119
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1273-82
pubmed: 16644275
Gait Posture. 2010 Jul;32(3):378-82
pubmed: 20655750
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:367-384
pubmed: 30482328
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46
pubmed: 22330108
Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii7-ii11
pubmed: 16926210
J Biomech. 2010 Mar 22;43(5):938-44
pubmed: 19959172
Gait Posture. 2009 Aug;30(2):217-22
pubmed: 19502061
World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):8-16
pubmed: 25621206
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 17;8:148
pubmed: 24672464
Gait Posture. 2008 Oct;28(3):466-71
pubmed: 18400500
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 1;38(9):1267-1284
pubmed: 33339474
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Jan;27(1):241-52
pubmed: 19645527
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Feb;27(2):145-50
pubmed: 22000699
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 20;10:999
pubmed: 31616361
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Oct;24(5):739-46
pubmed: 24909105