Survival outcomes after neoadjuvant letrozole and palbociclib versus third generation chemotherapy for patients with high-risk oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 14 12 2021
revised: 03 01 2022
accepted: 07 01 2022
pubmed: 27 3 2022
medline: 27 4 2022
entrez: 26 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Besides their development as additional adjuvant treatments, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy could represent less toxic alternatives to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with high-risk oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer currently a candidate for chemotherapy. The multicentre, international, randomised phase 2 NEOPAL trial showed that the letrozole-palbociclib combination led to clinical and pathological responses equivalent to sequential anthracycline-taxanes chemotherapy. Secondary objectives included survival outcomes. Secondary end-points of NEOPAL included progression-free survival (PFS) and invasive-disease free survival (iDFS) in the intent-to-treat population. Exploratory end-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in the intent-to-treat population, as well as iDFS, OS and BCSS according to the administration of chemotherapy. Hundred and six patients were randomised. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Twenty-three of the 53 patients in the letrozole-palbociclib arm received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40.4 months [0-56.6], 11 progressions have been observed, of which three were in the letrozole-palbociclib and 8 in the control arm. PFS (HR = 1.01; [95%CI 0.36-2.90], p = 0.98) and iDFS (HR = 0.83; [95%CI 0.31-2.23], p = 0.71) did not differ between both arms. The 40 months PFS rate was 86.7% [95%CI 78.0-96.4] and 89.9% [95%CI 81.8-98.7] in letrozole-palbociclib and control arms, respectively. Outcomes of patients who did not receive chemotherapy were not statistically different from those who received it. NEOPAL suggests that a neoadjuvant letrozole-palbociclib strategy may allow sparing chemotherapy in some patients with luminal breast cancer while allowing good long-term outcomes. Larger confirmatory studies are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Besides their development as additional adjuvant treatments, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy could represent less toxic alternatives to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with high-risk oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer currently a candidate for chemotherapy. The multicentre, international, randomised phase 2 NEOPAL trial showed that the letrozole-palbociclib combination led to clinical and pathological responses equivalent to sequential anthracycline-taxanes chemotherapy. Secondary objectives included survival outcomes.
METHODS
Secondary end-points of NEOPAL included progression-free survival (PFS) and invasive-disease free survival (iDFS) in the intent-to-treat population. Exploratory end-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in the intent-to-treat population, as well as iDFS, OS and BCSS according to the administration of chemotherapy.
RESULTS
Hundred and six patients were randomised. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Twenty-three of the 53 patients in the letrozole-palbociclib arm received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40.4 months [0-56.6], 11 progressions have been observed, of which three were in the letrozole-palbociclib and 8 in the control arm. PFS (HR = 1.01; [95%CI 0.36-2.90], p = 0.98) and iDFS (HR = 0.83; [95%CI 0.31-2.23], p = 0.71) did not differ between both arms. The 40 months PFS rate was 86.7% [95%CI 78.0-96.4] and 89.9% [95%CI 81.8-98.7] in letrozole-palbociclib and control arms, respectively. Outcomes of patients who did not receive chemotherapy were not statistically different from those who received it.
CONCLUSIONS
NEOPAL suggests that a neoadjuvant letrozole-palbociclib strategy may allow sparing chemotherapy in some patients with luminal breast cancer while allowing good long-term outcomes. Larger confirmatory studies are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35337692
pii: S0959-8049(22)00035-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.014
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Piperazines 0
Pyridines 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Letrozole 7LKK855W8I
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
palbociclib G9ZF61LE7G

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

300-308

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SDe, PC and JL report institutional funding for the present trial from Pfizer and Nanostring technologies. SDe reports institutional consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Besins, Sanofi, Rappta; institutional honoraria from AstraZeneca, Seagen, MSD, Pfizer; institutional investigating fees from Taiho, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, G1 therapeutics, BMS, Pfizer, Roche; and personal support for attending US conference from AstraZeneca and Pfizer. FL reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, EISAI, Lilly, Novartis, P Fabre, Roche; support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, EISAI, Lilly, Novartis, P Fabre, Pfizer, Roche; participation on IDMC or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, EISAI, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Roche. JSF reports personal consulting fees from ROCHE, ASTRA ZENECA, NOVARTIS, DAIICHI, LILLY, PFIZER, CLOVIS, GSK, MSD; honoraria from ASTRA ZENECA, NOVARTIS, DAIICHI, LILLY, PFIZER, CLOVIS, MSD, AMGEN; support for attending meetings from ASTRA ZENECA, NOVARTIS, DAIICHI, LILLY, PFIZER, CLOVIS, MSD; participation on IDMC or advisory board from ASTRA ZENECA, NOVARTIS, DAIICHI, LILLY, PFIZER, CLOVIS, MSD, PIERRE FABRE. PEH reports consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly; and support from Mylan, Eisei, Roche, Novartis. VDH reports support for attending meetings from Roche, Novartis Pfizer. CJ reports personal honoraria from Daiichi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer. FD reports consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Daiichi, Pierre Fabre, Seagen; and support for attending meetings from Roche and Pfizer. PC reports personal consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Daiichi and Seagen, honoraria from Pfizer and Novartis. The others did not report disclosures.

Auteurs

Suzette Delaloge (S)

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: suzette.delaloge@gustaveroussy.fr.

Sylvain Dureau (S)

Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Véronique D'Hondt (V)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Isabelle Desmoulins (I)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

Pierre-Etienne Heudel (PE)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

Francois P Duhoux (FP)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Christelle Levy (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Florence Lerebours (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, Saint Cloud, France.

Marie A Mouret-Reynier (MA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France.

Florence Dalenc (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Jean-Sébastien Frenel (JS)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.

Christelle Jouannaud (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France.

Laurence Venat-Bouvet (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.

Suzanne Nguyen (S)

Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France.

Cécile Callens (C)

Research Centre, Department of Translational Research, Genomics Platform, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.

David Gentien (D)

Research Centre, Department of Translational Research, Genomics Platform, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.

Audrey Rapinat (A)

Research Centre, Department of Translational Research, Genomics Platform, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.

Helene Manduzio (H)

R&D Unicancer, Paris, France.

Anne Vincent-Salomon (A)

Research Centre, Department of Translational Research, Genomics Platform, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.

Jérôme Lemonnier (J)

R&D Unicancer, Paris, France.

Paul Cottu (P)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie & PSL University, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH