Does cognitive reflection predict attentional control in visual tasks?

Antisaccade Cognitive reflection Eye movements Visual attention Visual search

Journal

Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 24 07 2019
revised: 24 02 2022
accepted: 14 03 2022
pubmed: 28 3 2022
medline: 29 4 2022
entrez: 27 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures the ability to suppress an intuitive, but incorrect, answer that easily comes to mind. The relationship between the CRT and different cognitive biases has been widely studied. However, whether cognitive reflection is related to attentional control is less well studied. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the inhibitory component of the CRT, measured by the number of non-intuitive answers of the CRT (Inhibitory Control Score), is related to the control of visual attention in visual tasks that involve overriding a bias in what to attend: an anti-saccade task and a visual search task. To test this possibility, we analyzed whether the CRT-Inhibitory Control Score (CRT-ICS) predicted attention allocation in each task. We compared the relationship between the CRT-ICS to two other potential predictors of attentional control: numeracy and visual working memory (VWM). Participants who scored lower on the CRT-ICS made more errors in the "look-away" trials in the anti-saccade task. Participants who scored higher on the CRT-ICS looked more often towards more informative color subsets in the visual search task. However, when controlling for numeracy and visual working memory, CRT-ICS scores were only related to the control of visual attention in the anti-saccade task.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35339923
pii: S0001-6918(22)00077-4
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103562
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103562

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alessia Dorigoni (A)

Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Italy. Electronic address: alessia.dorigoni@unitn.it.

Jason Rajsic (J)

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Nicolao Bonini (N)

Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH