Meta-Analytic Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Behavior Science Research.
behavior science
evidence-based behavior analysis
meta-analysis
publication bias
research-synthesis
single-case experimental design
Journal
Perspectives on behavior science
ISSN: 2520-8977
Titre abrégé: Perspect Behav Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101743058
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
accepted:
02
06
2021
entrez:
28
3
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
29
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Publication bias is an issue of great concern across a range of scientific fields. Although less documented in the behavior science fields, there is a need to explore viable methods for evaluating publication bias, in particular for studies based on single-case experimental design logic. Although publication bias is often detected by examining differences between meta-analytic effect sizes for published and grey studies, difficulties identifying the extent of grey studies within a particular research corpus present several challenges. We describe in this article several meta-analytic techniques for examining publication bias when published and grey literature are available as well as alternative meta-analytic techniques when grey literature is inaccessible. Although the majority of these methods have primarily been applied to meta-analyses of group design studies, our aim is to provide preliminary guidance for behavior scientists who might use or adapt these techniques for evaluating publication bias. We provide sample data sets and R scripts to follow along with the statistical analysis in hope that an increased understanding of publication bias and respective techniques will help researchers understand the extent to which it is a problem in behavior science research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35342865
doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00303-0
pii: 303
pmc: PMC8894526
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
37-52Informations de copyright
© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestWe have no known conflict known interest to disclose.
Références
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Jun 4;42(1):77-89
pubmed: 31976422
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
pubmed: 7786990
Stat Med. 2001 Feb 28;20(4):641-54
pubmed: 11223905
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
pubmed: 16345038
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Nov 14;42(1):13-31
pubmed: 31976419
Behav Modif. 2020 Mar;44(2):265-295
pubmed: 30360633
Evolution. 2005 Feb;59(2):464-8
pubmed: 15807430
JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):676-80
pubmed: 16467236
Behav Modif. 2021 Jan;45(1):147-176
pubmed: 30854879
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Sep;53(4):2151-2171
pubmed: 32407557
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 May 24;42(3):565-581
pubmed: 31976450
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):309-328
pubmed: 30706944
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1799-1821
pubmed: 32421220
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):534-47
pubmed: 23855496
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):559-69
pubmed: 25800521
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):329-341
pubmed: 30701555
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1046-55
pubmed: 11576817
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jun 19;42(3):583-616
pubmed: 31976451
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 May 15;42(3):617-645
pubmed: 31976452
Biometrics. 2018 Sep;74(3):785-794
pubmed: 29141096
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Jun;68:99-112
pubmed: 29861034
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Nov;11(6):725-742
pubmed: 32893970
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jul 16;:
pubmed: 32673040
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):252-269
pubmed: 33645325
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):870-892
pubmed: 31243766
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29
pubmed: 11106885
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):663-78
pubmed: 24990802
Science. 2014 Sep 19;345(6203):1502-5
pubmed: 25170047
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Mar 18;42(1):59-75
pubmed: 31976421