Bone tunnel placement influences shear stresses at the coracoid process after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a finite element study and radiological analysis.
AC joint repair
Coracoid fracture
Finite element analysis
Shear stress
Shoulder arthroscopy
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
05
10
2021
accepted:
05
02
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
16
2
2023
entrez:
28
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Coracoid fractures after arthroscopic treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations lead to poor clinical outcomes. In this study, different configurations of bone tunnels in the lateral clavicle and coracoid were examined concerning the amount of stress induced in the coracoid. An authentic 3D finite element model of an ac joint was established. Three 2.4 mm bone tunnels were inserted in the lateral clavicle, which were situated above, medially and laterally of the coracoid. Then, two 2.4 mm bone tunnels were inserted in the latter, each simulating a proximal and a distal suture button position. Von Mises stress analyses were performed to evaluate the amount of stress caused in the coracoid process by the different configurations. Then, a clinical series of radiographs was examined, the placement of the clavicle drill hole was analyzed and the number of dangerous configurations was recorded. The safest configuration was a proximal tunnel in the coracoid combined with a lateral bone tunnel in the clavicle, leading to an oblique traction at the coracoid. A distal bone tunnel in the coracoid and perpendicular traction as well as a proximal tunnel in the coracoid with medial traction caused the highest stresses. Anatomical placement of the clavicle drill hole does lead to configurations with smaller stresses. The bone tunnel placement with the smallest amount of shear stresses was found when the traction of the suture button was directed slightly lateral, towards the AC joint. Anatomical placement of the clavicle drill hole alone was not sufficient in preventing dangerous configurations. Controlled laboratory study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35344065
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04382-9
pii: 10.1007/s00402-022-04382-9
pmc: PMC9925482
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
959-965Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):679-686
pubmed: 27989719
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):137-44
pubmed: 22521389
J Biomech. 1983;16(6):385-409
pubmed: 6352706
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):387-97
pubmed: 23369483
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):212-220
pubmed: 28717889
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):125-135
pubmed: 28547587
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jun;21(6):795-803
pubmed: 22173268
Int Orthop. 1999;23(4):198-201
pubmed: 10591933
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Dec;36(12):2392-7
pubmed: 18755935
JSES Int. 2020 Jun 12;4(3):515-518
pubmed: 32939478
Am J Sports Med. 2007 May;35(5):811-7
pubmed: 17293463
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jul;20(5):e6-10
pubmed: 21489825
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Oct;28(10):2031-2038
pubmed: 31350107
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jan;7(1):24-32
pubmed: 30805412
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S70-S75
pubmed: 29307671
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1628-34
pubmed: 22553116
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Oct;49(12):3218-3225
pubmed: 34494899
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):825-30
pubmed: 25633818
J Theor Biol. 2007 Feb 21;244(4):597-620
pubmed: 17074362