[Allergic reactions to bioimplants].
Allergische Reaktionen auf Bioimplantate.
Bone cements
Cochlear implants
Dental implants
Methacrylates
Ossicular prosthesis
Journal
HNO
ISSN: 1433-0458
Titre abrégé: HNO
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 2985099R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
accepted:
21
03
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
entrez:
28
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bioimplants are used in a variety of ways in otorhinolaryngology, most commonly in facial reconstructive surgery, cochlear implants (CI), bone-anchored hearing aids, and partial/total ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP/TORP), but also for tympanic drainage, laryngeal cannula, voice prostheses after laryngectomy, etc., and in otorhinolaryngology-related procedures as dental implants in dentistry. A literature search was performed to analyze the immunology of allergic reactions to bioimplants and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, PubMed, and national and international study and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 12/2021 were considered. Based on the international literature and previous experience, a review of allergies to bioimplants in otolaryngology is presented. Otorhinolaryngologists should always consider the possibility of allergic reactions when inserting allogeneic materials, particularly, but not only, when using bioimplants. HINTERGRUND: Bioimplantate werden im HNO-Bereich vielfältig eingesetzt, am häufigsten in der rekonstruktiven Gesichtschirurgie, bei Cochleaimplantaten (CI), knochenverankerten Hörgeräten, PORP/TORP-Prothesen („partial ossicular replacement prosthesis“, „total ossicular replacement prosthesis“), aber auch u. a. bei Paukendrainagen, Larynxkanülen, Stimmprothesen nach Laryngektomie und auch bei „HNO-nahen“ Eingriffen als dentale Implantate in der Zahnmedizin. In einer Literatursuche wurde die Immunologie allergischer Reaktionen auf Bioimplantate analysiert und die vorhandene Evidenz ermittelt durch Recherchen in den Datenbanken Medline, PubMed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinienregistern und der Cochrane Library. Es wurden Humanstudien berücksichtigt, die im Zeitraum bis einschließlich 12/2021 publiziert wurden. Basierend auf der internationalen Literatur und bisheriger Erfahrungen wird eine Übersicht über Allergien auf Bioimplantate in der HNO-Heilkunde gegeben. HNO-Ärzte sollten bei Einbringen allogener Materialien immer auch an die Möglichkeit allergischer Reaktionen denken – insbesondere auch, aber nicht nur – bei Bioimplantaten.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Bioimplants are used in a variety of ways in otorhinolaryngology, most commonly in facial reconstructive surgery, cochlear implants (CI), bone-anchored hearing aids, and partial/total ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP/TORP), but also for tympanic drainage, laryngeal cannula, voice prostheses after laryngectomy, etc., and in otorhinolaryngology-related procedures as dental implants in dentistry.
METHODS
METHODS
A literature search was performed to analyze the immunology of allergic reactions to bioimplants and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, PubMed, and national and international study and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 12/2021 were considered.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Based on the international literature and previous experience, a review of allergies to bioimplants in otolaryngology is presented.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Otorhinolaryngologists should always consider the possibility of allergic reactions when inserting allogeneic materials, particularly, but not only, when using bioimplants.
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
UNASSIGNED
HINTERGRUND: Bioimplantate werden im HNO-Bereich vielfältig eingesetzt, am häufigsten in der rekonstruktiven Gesichtschirurgie, bei Cochleaimplantaten (CI), knochenverankerten Hörgeräten, PORP/TORP-Prothesen („partial ossicular replacement prosthesis“, „total ossicular replacement prosthesis“), aber auch u. a. bei Paukendrainagen, Larynxkanülen, Stimmprothesen nach Laryngektomie und auch bei „HNO-nahen“ Eingriffen als dentale Implantate in der Zahnmedizin.
METHODEN
METHODS
In einer Literatursuche wurde die Immunologie allergischer Reaktionen auf Bioimplantate analysiert und die vorhandene Evidenz ermittelt durch Recherchen in den Datenbanken Medline, PubMed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinienregistern und der Cochrane Library. Es wurden Humanstudien berücksichtigt, die im Zeitraum bis einschließlich 12/2021 publiziert wurden.
ERGEBNIS
UNASSIGNED
Basierend auf der internationalen Literatur und bisheriger Erfahrungen wird eine Übersicht über Allergien auf Bioimplantate in der HNO-Heilkunde gegeben.
SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN
UNASSIGNED
HNO-Ärzte sollten bei Einbringen allogener Materialien immer auch an die Möglichkeit allergischer Reaktionen denken – insbesondere auch, aber nicht nur – bei Bioimplantaten.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
HINTERGRUND: Bioimplantate werden im HNO-Bereich vielfältig eingesetzt, am häufigsten in der rekonstruktiven Gesichtschirurgie, bei Cochleaimplantaten (CI), knochenverankerten Hörgeräten, PORP/TORP-Prothesen („partial ossicular replacement prosthesis“, „total ossicular replacement prosthesis“), aber auch u. a. bei Paukendrainagen, Larynxkanülen, Stimmprothesen nach Laryngektomie und auch bei „HNO-nahen“ Eingriffen als dentale Implantate in der Zahnmedizin.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35344067
doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01173-x
pii: 10.1007/s00106-022-01173-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
361-370Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
Références
Klimek L et al (2017) Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int 26(1):16–24
pubmed: 28217433
pmcid: 5288410
doi: 10.1007/s40629-016-0006-7
Klimek L, Vogelberg C, Werfel T (2019) Weißbuch Allergie in Deutschland Bd. 402. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 25 (Online-Ressource)
doi: 10.1007/978-3-89935-313-6
Klimek L, Pfaar O, Rietschel E (2013) Allergien bei Kindern und Jugendlichen Grundlagen und klinische Praxis, 1. Aufl. Aufl. Schattauer GmbH (Mit Handouts zum Download)
Kripke ML et al (1950) Evidence that cutaneous antigen-presenting cells migrate to regional lymph nodes during contact sensitization. J Immunol 145(9):2833–2838
Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T (1966) Physicochemical properties of reaginic antibody. 1. Association of reaginic activity with an immunoglobulin other than gammaA- or gammaG-globulin. J Allergy 37(3): p:169–185
doi: 10.1016/0021-8707(66)90091-8
Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T, Hornbrook MM (1966) Physicochemical properties of reaginic antibody. V. Correlation of reaginic activity with gamma-E-globulin antibody. J Immunol 97(6):840–853
pubmed: 4163008
Johansson SG (1967) Raised levels of a new immunoglobulin class (IgND) in asthma. Lancet 2(7523):951–953
pubmed: 4167514
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90792-1
Vercelli D (1993) Regulation of IgE synthesis. Allergy Proc 14(6):413–416
pubmed: 7512517
doi: 10.2500/108854193778792795
Moffatt MF et al (1994) Genetic linkage of T‑cell receptor alpha/delta complex to specific IgE responses. Lancet 343(8913):1597–1600
pubmed: 7911920
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)93057-0
Mosmann TR et al (1986) Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol 136(7):2348–2357
pubmed: 2419430
Maggi E et al (1992) Reciprocal regulatory effects of IFN-gamma and IL‑4 on the in vitro development of human Th1 and Th2 clones. J Immunol 148(7):2142–2147
pubmed: 1532000
Jones HE et al (1975) Atopic disease and serum immunoglobulin‑E. Br J Dermatol 92(1):17–25
pubmed: 1156542
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1975.tb03028.x
Kay AB et al (1991) Messenger RNA expression of the cytokine gene cluster, interleukin 3 (IL-3), IL‑4, IL‑5, and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in allergen-induced late-phase cutaneous reactions in atopic subjects. J Exp Med 173(3):775–778
pubmed: 1997656
doi: 10.1084/jem.173.3.775
van Reijsen FC et al (1992) Skin-derived aeroallergen-specific T‑cell clones of Th2 phenotype in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 90(2):184–193
pubmed: 1380019
doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90070-I
Reinhold U et al (1988) Immunoglobulin E and immunoglobulin G subclass distribution in vivo and relationship to in vitro generation of interferon-gamma and neopterin in patients with severe atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 87(2):120–126
pubmed: 2973440
doi: 10.1159/000234661
Renz H et al (1994) Inhibition of IgE production and normalization of airways responsiveness by sensitized CD8 T cells in a mouse model of allergen-induced sensitization. J Immunol 152(1):351–360
pubmed: 8254203
Maurer D, Stingl G (1995) Immunoglobulin E‑binding structures on antigen-presenting cells present in skin and blood. J Invest Dermatol 104(5):707–710
pubmed: 7738345
doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12606958
Gordon J et al (1989) CD23: a multi-functional receptor/lymphokine? Immunol Today 10(5):153–157
pubmed: 2525911
doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(89)90171-0
Schwartz L, Huff T (1993) Biology of mast cells and Basophils. In: Middleton EJ, Reed CE, Ellis EF et al (Hrsg) Allergy, Principles and Practice. Mosby-Year-Book, St. Louis
Dale HH, Laidlaw PP (1910) The physiological action of β‑iminazolylethylamine. J Physiol 41(5):318–344
pubmed: 16993030
pmcid: 1512903
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1910.sp001406
Samuelsson B (1983) Leukotrienes: mediators of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and inflammation. Science 220(4597):568–575
pubmed: 6301011
doi: 10.1126/science.6301011
Church MK, el-Lati S, Caulfield JP (1991) Neuropeptide-induced secretion from human skin mast cells. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 94(1–4):310–318
pubmed: 1718893
doi: 10.1159/000235393
Schleimer RP et al (1992) IL‑4 induces adherence of human eosinophils and basophils but not neutrophils to endothelium. Association with expression of VCAM‑1. J Immunol 148(4):1086–1092
pubmed: 1371130
Wang JM et al (1989) Recombinant human interleukin 5 is a selective eosinophil chemoattractant. Eur J Immunol 19(4):701–705
pubmed: 2659368
doi: 10.1002/eji.1830190420
Wardlaw AJ et al (1986) Platelet-activating factor. A potent chemotactic and chemokinetic factor for human eosinophils. J Clin Invest 78(6):1701–1706
pubmed: 3023451
pmcid: 423945
doi: 10.1172/JCI112765
Karlberg A‑T et al (2008) Allergic contact dermatitis—formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 21(1):53–69
pubmed: 18052130
doi: 10.1021/tx7002239
Aptula AO, Roberts DW, Pease CK (2007) Haptens, prohaptens and prehaptens, or electrophiles and proelectrophiles. Contact Derm 56(1):54–56
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.00944.x
Liu B et al (2013) TRPA1 controls inflammation and pruritogen responses in allergic contact dermatitis. FASEB J 27(9):3549–3563
pubmed: 23722916
pmcid: 3752543
doi: 10.1096/fj.13-229948
Kolesaric A, Stingl G, Elbe-Bürger A (1997) MHC class I+/II-dendritic cells induce hapten-specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 109(4):580–585
pubmed: 9326394
doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12337508
Krasteva M et al (1950) Dual role of dendritic cells in the induction and down-regulation of antigen-specific cutaneous inflammation. J Immunol 160(3):1181–1190
Ebner S et al (2007) Thymic stromal lymphopoietin converts human epidermal Langerhans cells into antigen-presenting cells that induce proallergic T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119(4):982–990
pubmed: 17320941
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.003
Liu Y‑J et al (2007) TSLP: an epithelial cell cytokine that regulates T cell differentiation by conditioning dendritic cell maturation. Annu Rev Immunol 25: p:193–219
doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141718
Gaide O et al (2015) Common clonal origin of central and resident memory T cells following skin immunization. Nat Med 21(6):647–653
pubmed: 25962122
pmcid: 4632197
doi: 10.1038/nm.3860
Girolomoni G et al (2004) Immunoregulation of allergic contact dermatitis. J Dermatol 31(4):264–270
pubmed: 15187320
doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00671.x
Akiba H et al (2002) Skin inflammation during contact hypersensitivity is mediated by early recruitment of CD8+ T cytotoxic 1 cells inducing keratinocyte apoptosis. J Immunol 168(6):3079–3087
pubmed: 11884482
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.3079
Cavani A (2008) Immune regulatory mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis and contact sensitization. Chem Immunol Allergy 94: p:93–100
doi: 10.1159/000154934
He D et al (2009) IL-17 and IFN-gamma mediate the elicitation of contact hypersensitivity responses by different mechanisms and both are required for optimal responses. J Immunol 183(2):1463–1470
pubmed: 19553527
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804108
Chen G et al (2014) Upconversion nanoparticles: design, nanochemistry, and applications in theranostics. Chem Rev 114(10):5161–5214
pubmed: 24605868
pmcid: 4039352
doi: 10.1021/cr400425h
Hoyne GF, Lamb JR (1997) Regulation of T cell function in mucosal tolerance. Immunol Cell Biol 75(2):197–201
pubmed: 9107576
doi: 10.1038/icb.1997.29
Coricovac D‑E et al (2017) Biocompatible colloidal suspensions based on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and toxicological profile. Front Pharmacol 8:154
pubmed: 28400730
pmcid: 5368253
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00154
Browne JA et al (2010) Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(9):2313–2320
pubmed: 20559767
pmcid: 2919884
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1419-0
Amini M et al (2014) Evaluation and management of metal hypersensitivity in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 24(1):25–36
pubmed: 24941403
doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2014010277
Park Y‑S et al (2005) Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1515–1521
pubmed: 15995119
Cooper HJ et al (2013) Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg 95(10):865–872
pubmed: 23677352
pmcid: 3748981
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01042
Yi PH et al (2014) Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):498–505
pmcid: 4294906
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5
Anand A, McGlynn F, Jiranek W (2009) Metal hypersensitivity: can it mimic infection? J Arthroplasty 24(5):826.e25–826.e28
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.002
Chang J‑D et al (2005) Revision total hip arthroplasty in hip joints with metallosis: a single-center experience with 31 cases. J Arthroplasty 20(5):568–573
pubmed: 16309990
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.001
Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ (2006) Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg 88(6):1171–1172
pubmed: 16757747
Pacheco KA (2015) Allergy to Surgical Implants. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 3(5):683–695
pubmed: 26362550
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.011
Niki Y et al (2006) Phenotypic characteristics of joint fluid cells from patients with continuous joint effusion after total knee arthroplasty. Biomaterials 27(8):1558–1565
pubmed: 16183112
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.011
Schalock PC et al (2012) Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants—diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Derm 66(1):4–19
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01971.x
Jaakkola MS et al (2007) Respiratory effects of exposure to methacrylates among dental assistants. Allergy 62(6):648–654
pubmed: 17508969
doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01379.x
Schorr WF, Ridgway HB (1977) Tobramycin-neomycin cross-sensitivity. Contact Derm 3(3):133–137
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1977.tb03627.x
Eben R et al (2010) Contact allergy to metals and bone cement components in patients with intolerance of arthroplasty. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 135(28):1418–1422
pubmed: 20614402
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262426
Goon AT‑J et al (2011) Correlation between stated and measured concentrations of acrylate and methacrylate allergens in patch-test preparations. Dermatitis 22(1):27–32
pubmed: 21291640
doi: 10.2310/6620.2011.10083
Gittler JK, Krueger JG, Guttman-Yassky E (2013) Atopic dermatitis results in intrinsic barrier and immune abnormalities: Implications for contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131(2):300–313
pubmed: 22939651
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.048
Hallab NJ (2004) Lymphocyte transformation testing for quantifying metal-implant-related hypersensitivity responses. Dermatitis 15(2):82–90
pubmed: 15473335
doi: 10.2310/6620.2004.03054
Kirshen C, Pratt M (2012) Dental allergic contact dermatitis: an interesting case series and review of the literature. Dermatitis 23(5):222–226
pubmed: 23010830
doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31826e4567
Bakula A et al (2011) Contact allergy in the mouth: diversity of clinical presentations and diagnosis of common allergens relevant to dental practice. Acta Clin Croat 50(4):553–561
pubmed: 22649886
Pazzini CA et al (2010) Allergy to nickel in orthodontic patients: clinical and histopathologic evaluation. Gen Dent 58(1):58–61
pubmed: 20129894
Schedle A et al (2007) Do adverse effects of dental materials exist? What are the consequences, and how can they be diagnosed and treated? Clin Oral Impl Res 18(3):232–256
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01481.x
Gawkrodger DJ (2005) Investigation of reactions to dental materials. Br J Dermatol 153(3):479–485
pubmed: 16120131
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06821.x
Hamann CP, DePaola LG, Rodgers PA (2005) Occupation-related allergies in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 136(4):500–510
pubmed: 15884321
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0207
Mallo Pérez L, Díaz Donado C (2003) Intraoral contact allergy to materials used in dental practice. A critical review. Med Oral 8(5):334–347
pubmed: 14595258
Coombs und Gell
Lerner S (2019) Limitations of conventional hearing aids: examining common complaints and issues that Can and cannot be remedied. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 52(2):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2018.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.11.002
pubmed: 30612754
Nadol JB Jr, Eddington DK, Burgess BJ (2008) Foreign body or hypersensitivity Granuloma of the inner ear after cochlear implantation: one possible cause of a soft failure? Otol Neurotol 29(8):1076–1084. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818c33cf
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818c33cf
pubmed: 18997635
pmcid: 4180287
Alves F, Ribeiro JC, Alves M, Gonçalo M (2020) Titanium allergy as a possible cause of extrusion of a bone conduction ear implant. Contact Derm 83(2):148–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13566
doi: 10.1111/cod.13566
Liu YZ, Cao KL, Wang Y, Wie CG, Yang LJ et al (2008) 43(6):409–413 (PMID: 18826090)
Migirov L, Dagan E, Kronenberg J (2009) Acta Otolaryngol 129(7):741–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480802398954
doi: 10.1080/00016480802398954
pubmed: 18763176
Kunda LD, Stidham KR, Inserra MM, Roland PS, Franklin D, Roberson JB Jr. (2006) Silicone allergy. Otol Neurotol 27(8):1078–1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000235378.64654.4d
pubmed: 17130797
Iwasaki S, Nagura M, Mizuta K (2006) Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(4):365–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-1006-2
doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-1006-2
pubmed: 16328408
Puri S, Dornhoffer JL, North PE (2005) Contact dermatitis to silicone after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 115(10):1760–1762. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000172202.58968.41
doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000172202.58968.41
pubmed: 16222190
Lung HL, Huang LH, Lin HC, Shyur SD (2009) J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 19(2):161–162
pubmed: 19476023