Allergen immunotherapy in MASK-air users in real-life: Results of a Bayesian mixed-effects model.
allergic rhinitis
immunotherapy
mobile health
patient-reported outcomes
real-life data analysis
Journal
Clinical and translational allergy
ISSN: 2045-7022
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Allergy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101576043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
revised:
17
01
2022
received:
08
10
2021
accepted:
31
01
2022
entrez:
28
3
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
29
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on allergic rhinitis has been provided mostly by randomised controlled trials, with little data from real-life studies. To compare the reported control of allergic rhinitis symptoms in three groups of users of the MASK-air We assessed the MASK-air We analysed a total of 42,756 days from 1,093 grass allergy patients, including 18,479 days of users under AIT. Compared to no AIT, SCIT was associated with similar VAS levels and CSMS. Compared to no AIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower values of VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 7.5 units out of 100; 95% credible interval [95%CrI] = -12.1;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 5.0; 95%CrI = -8.5;-1.5), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 3.7; 95%CrI = -9.3;2.2). When compared to SCIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 10.2; 95%CrI = -17.2;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 7.8; 95%CrI = -15.1;0.2), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 9.3; 95%CrI = -18.5;0.2). In patients with grass pollen allergy, SLIT-tablet, when compared to no AIT and to SCIT, is associated with lower reported symptom severity. Future longitudinal studies following internationally-harmonised standards for performing and reporting real-world data in AIT are needed to better understand its 'real-world' effectiveness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on allergic rhinitis has been provided mostly by randomised controlled trials, with little data from real-life studies.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To compare the reported control of allergic rhinitis symptoms in three groups of users of the MASK-air
METHODS
METHODS
We assessed the MASK-air
RESULTS
RESULTS
We analysed a total of 42,756 days from 1,093 grass allergy patients, including 18,479 days of users under AIT. Compared to no AIT, SCIT was associated with similar VAS levels and CSMS. Compared to no AIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower values of VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 7.5 units out of 100; 95% credible interval [95%CrI] = -12.1;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 5.0; 95%CrI = -8.5;-1.5), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 3.7; 95%CrI = -9.3;2.2). When compared to SCIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 10.2; 95%CrI = -17.2;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 7.8; 95%CrI = -15.1;0.2), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 9.3; 95%CrI = -18.5;0.2).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with grass pollen allergy, SLIT-tablet, when compared to no AIT and to SCIT, is associated with lower reported symptom severity. Future longitudinal studies following internationally-harmonised standards for performing and reporting real-world data in AIT are needed to better understand its 'real-world' effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35344295
doi: 10.1002/clt2.12128
pmc: PMC8967259
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12128Subventions
Organisme : EIT Health Twinning
Organisme : Mylan-Viatris
Organisme : GSK
Organisme : ALK
Organisme : Uriach
Organisme : Novartis
Organisme : Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Organisme : EIT Health POLLAR
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Références
Allergy. 2021 Dec 21;:
pubmed: 34932829
Allergy. 2021 Sep;76(9):2663-2672
pubmed: 33583050
Allergy. 2021 Oct;76(10):3212-3214
pubmed: 34028052
Allergy. 2019 Apr;74(4):698-708
pubmed: 30447164
Allergy. 2021 Mar;76(3):629-647
pubmed: 32324902
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):950-958
pubmed: 28602936
Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):739-743
pubmed: 29380390
Nat Methods. 2015 Sep;12(9):799-800
pubmed: 26554085
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1715-25
pubmed: 27115376
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;117(2):319-25
pubmed: 16461133
Allergy. 2019 Jul;74(7):1317-1326
pubmed: 30589088
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;145(1):70-80.e3
pubmed: 31627910
Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Aug 2;7:25
pubmed: 28775845
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jul;144(1):135-143.e6
pubmed: 30951790
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Mar;12(3):e12128
pubmed: 35344295
Allergy. 2019 Mar;74(3):594-604
pubmed: 30183091
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 May;9(5):1805-1812
pubmed: 33662672
Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):765-798
pubmed: 28940458
Clin Transl Allergy. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):62
pubmed: 33298191
Allergy. 2021 Jan;76(1):168-190
pubmed: 32512619
Allergy. 2019 Dec;74 Suppl 108:3-25
pubmed: 31872476
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):468-75
pubmed: 10441602
Rev Mal Respir. 2019 Nov;36(9):1019-1031
pubmed: 31611024
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 Nov 19;21(11):61
pubmed: 31741083
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Mar;8(3):1063-1073.e4
pubmed: 31786252
Clin Transl Allergy. 2021 Sep 19;11(7):e12062
pubmed: 34567526
Allergy. 2019 Nov;74(11):2087-2102
pubmed: 30955224
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52
pubmed: 25803266
Allergy. 2020 Sep;75(9):2411-2414
pubmed: 32163594
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Sep;126(3):466-76
pubmed: 20816182
Allergy. 2018 Aug;73(8):1622-1631
pubmed: 29569295
Allergy. 2020 Jul;75(7):1672-1688
pubmed: 31995656
Allergy. 2017 Oct;72(10):1475-1484
pubmed: 28387952
Allergy. 2018 Sep;73(9):1775-1783
pubmed: 29446469
Clin Transl Allergy. 2019 Feb 11;9:4
pubmed: 30792849
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):245-252
pubmed: 34664513
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):e12297
pubmed: 30664494
Sleep Health. 2021 Apr;7(2):143-152
pubmed: 33678602