Early detection and intervention for young children with early developmental disabilities in Western Uganda: a mixed-methods evaluation.
Developmental disability
Early detection
Early intervention
Uganda
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 03 2022
26 03 2022
Historique:
received:
15
07
2021
accepted:
28
02
2022
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early support for children with developmental disabilities is crucial but frequently unavailable in low-resource settings. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a programme of early detection and intervention for young children with developmental disabilities in Western Uganda. Early child development training for healthcare workers (HCWs) was implemented in three rural districts, and attendance was tracked. HCW knowledge and confidence were assessed pre-/post-intervention, and referral numbers tracked to evaluate impact. Facilitators were trained and mentored to deliver a participatory, group, early intervention programme (EIP) for young children with developmental disabilities and their families. Facilitators were tracked as they were identified, trained, and delivered the intervention, and attendance of families was tracked. Pre-/post-intervention assessments evaluated changes in family quality of life (PedsQL 2.0, Family Impact Module), and child nutritional outcomes. Focus group discussions with stakeholders also assessed feasibility, acceptability and impact. Overall, 93 HCWs from 45 healthcare facilities received training. In the pre-/post-evaluation, median knowledge and confidence scores increased significantly (from 4.0 to 7.0 and from 2.7 to 4.7, respectively (p < 0.001)). HCWs reported feeling empowered to refer and offer care for families with a young child with disability. Referral rates increased significantly from 148 to 251 per annum (70%; p = 0.03). Eleven EIP facilitators were trained, and all delivered the intervention; 84 families were enrolled, of which 78% attended at least 6 out of 10 modules. Amongst those with paired pre-/post-intervention data (n = 48), total family quality of life scores increased significantly (21%, p < 0.001). Improvements were seen across all domains of quality of life, with the largest impacts on emotional functioning and social functioning (p < 0.001). The programme was acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Caregivers reported improved knowledge, family relationships, hope, emotional wellbeing, and reduced self-stigma. A programme of early detection and intervention for children with early developmental disabilities and their families was feasible and acceptable in a rural community-based Ugandan setting. HCW training positively impacted knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and referral rates. Families enrolled to the EIP reported significant improvements in quality of life. Important programmatic barriers identified included geographical spread, poverty, gender inequality, and stigma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Early support for children with developmental disabilities is crucial but frequently unavailable in low-resource settings. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a programme of early detection and intervention for young children with developmental disabilities in Western Uganda.
METHODS
Early child development training for healthcare workers (HCWs) was implemented in three rural districts, and attendance was tracked. HCW knowledge and confidence were assessed pre-/post-intervention, and referral numbers tracked to evaluate impact. Facilitators were trained and mentored to deliver a participatory, group, early intervention programme (EIP) for young children with developmental disabilities and their families. Facilitators were tracked as they were identified, trained, and delivered the intervention, and attendance of families was tracked. Pre-/post-intervention assessments evaluated changes in family quality of life (PedsQL 2.0, Family Impact Module), and child nutritional outcomes. Focus group discussions with stakeholders also assessed feasibility, acceptability and impact.
RESULTS
Overall, 93 HCWs from 45 healthcare facilities received training. In the pre-/post-evaluation, median knowledge and confidence scores increased significantly (from 4.0 to 7.0 and from 2.7 to 4.7, respectively (p < 0.001)). HCWs reported feeling empowered to refer and offer care for families with a young child with disability. Referral rates increased significantly from 148 to 251 per annum (70%; p = 0.03). Eleven EIP facilitators were trained, and all delivered the intervention; 84 families were enrolled, of which 78% attended at least 6 out of 10 modules. Amongst those with paired pre-/post-intervention data (n = 48), total family quality of life scores increased significantly (21%, p < 0.001). Improvements were seen across all domains of quality of life, with the largest impacts on emotional functioning and social functioning (p < 0.001). The programme was acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Caregivers reported improved knowledge, family relationships, hope, emotional wellbeing, and reduced self-stigma.
CONCLUSIONS
A programme of early detection and intervention for children with early developmental disabilities and their families was feasible and acceptable in a rural community-based Ugandan setting. HCW training positively impacted knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and referral rates. Families enrolled to the EIP reported significant improvements in quality of life. Important programmatic barriers identified included geographical spread, poverty, gender inequality, and stigma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35346133
doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03184-7
pii: 10.1186/s12887-022-03184-7
pmc: PMC8962031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
158Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R010161/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90
pubmed: 27717614
J Nutr. 2004 Jun;134(6):1417-23
pubmed: 15173406
Chin Med J (Engl). 1999 Jun;112(6):520-3
pubmed: 11605609
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Sep;58(9):900-9
pubmed: 27027732
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(Suppl 1):S22-S33
pubmed: 30885963
N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 31;318(13):803-8
pubmed: 3280999
Afr J Disabil. 2021 Apr 30;10:827
pubmed: 34007819
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1100-e1121
pubmed: 30172774
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(7):861-868
pubmed: 29212379
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0219888
pubmed: 31361768
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 9;9(10):e032705
pubmed: 31601606
J Pediatr. 2003 Nov;143(5):634-9
pubmed: 14615736
J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):705-712.e3
pubmed: 23164311
Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14
pubmed: 17370477
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Apr 30;10:27
pubmed: 20433740
Ambul Pediatr. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):329-41
pubmed: 14616041
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1470-6
pubmed: 25323396
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):846-858
pubmed: 33999106
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 26;10(4):e032134
pubmed: 32341042
Infants Young Child. 2021 Jan;34(1):17-32
pubmed: 33790497
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Jan;45(1):45-53
pubmed: 30259548