Use of reusable menstrual management materials and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Ghana: analysis of the 2017/18 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.
Ghana
Reusable menstrual materials
Sanitary pad
Women in reproductive age
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 03 2022
26 03 2022
Historique:
received:
17
10
2021
accepted:
17
03
2022
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of unsafe materials to collect menstrual blood predisposes women and girls to infections. There is a paucity of literature on the utilization of reusable menstrual materials in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined factors associated with the use of reusable menstrual management materials among women of reproductive age in Ghana. Findings from this study can inform menstrual health programmes and reproductive health policy to address menstrual hygiene and specific areas of emphasis. We analysed secondary data from the 2017/18 Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Descriptive statistics were employed to compute frequencies and percentages, while Chi-square and complex sample Binomial Logistic Regression was conducted to identify factors associated with the use of reusable menstrual materials. Half (52%) of the respondents were below 30 years old; mean (± sd) = 30.7(9.0). Thirteen percent used reusable materials to collect menstrual blood during their last period. Women aged 45-49 years (AOR = 5.34; 95% CI 3.47-8.19) were 5 times more likely to manage menstruation with reusable materials compared with those aged 15-19 years (p < 0.05). Women classified in the middle wealth quintile (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.88) were 34% less likely to use reusable materials to collect menstrual blood compared with women in the poorest wealth quintile (p < 0.05). Also, women who were exposed to television (AOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-0.99) had less odds of using reusable materials compared with women who were not exposed to television (p < 0.05). This study showed that the use of reusable menstrual materials was influenced by socio-demographic factors, economic factors and exposure to mass media. Therefore, policies and programmes aimed at promoting menstrual health should focus on less privileged women. The mass media presents an opportunity for communicating menstrual hygiene.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The use of unsafe materials to collect menstrual blood predisposes women and girls to infections. There is a paucity of literature on the utilization of reusable menstrual materials in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined factors associated with the use of reusable menstrual management materials among women of reproductive age in Ghana. Findings from this study can inform menstrual health programmes and reproductive health policy to address menstrual hygiene and specific areas of emphasis.
METHODS
We analysed secondary data from the 2017/18 Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Descriptive statistics were employed to compute frequencies and percentages, while Chi-square and complex sample Binomial Logistic Regression was conducted to identify factors associated with the use of reusable menstrual materials.
RESULTS
Half (52%) of the respondents were below 30 years old; mean (± sd) = 30.7(9.0). Thirteen percent used reusable materials to collect menstrual blood during their last period. Women aged 45-49 years (AOR = 5.34; 95% CI 3.47-8.19) were 5 times more likely to manage menstruation with reusable materials compared with those aged 15-19 years (p < 0.05). Women classified in the middle wealth quintile (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.88) were 34% less likely to use reusable materials to collect menstrual blood compared with women in the poorest wealth quintile (p < 0.05). Also, women who were exposed to television (AOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-0.99) had less odds of using reusable materials compared with women who were not exposed to television (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that the use of reusable menstrual materials was influenced by socio-demographic factors, economic factors and exposure to mass media. Therefore, policies and programmes aimed at promoting menstrual health should focus on less privileged women. The mass media presents an opportunity for communicating menstrual hygiene.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35346152
doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01670-9
pii: 10.1186/s12905-022-01670-9
pmc: PMC8962551
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
92Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):279
pubmed: 34340667
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Nov;35(11):946-59
pubmed: 18685546
Adv Prev Med. 2016;2016:1056235
pubmed: 27525125
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e62004
pubmed: 23637945
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0130777
pubmed: 26125184
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241106
pubmed: 33091080
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):473
pubmed: 30241498
BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e015429
pubmed: 28473520
Reprod Health. 2016 Dec 7;13(1):143
pubmed: 27923379
PLoS Med. 2019 May 16;16(5):e1002803
pubmed: 31095568
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 29;37:190
pubmed: 33447345
Cult Health Sex. 2021 May;23(5):624-643
pubmed: 32116149
Reprod Health Matters. 2013 May;21(41):205-13
pubmed: 23684203
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e013229
pubmed: 27881530
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):33
pubmed: 29394899
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Feb 20;2018:1730964
pubmed: 29675047
Reprod Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(1):185
pubmed: 33228723
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4699-4704
pubmed: 33209786
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0248825
pubmed: 34106948
Reprod Health. 2017 Jun 27;14(1):78
pubmed: 28655302