Validation of desk-based audits using Google Street View
Built environment
Neighbourhood
Pediatric obesity
Urban design
Walkability
Journal
International journal of health geographics
ISSN: 1476-072X
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Geogr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101152198
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 03 2022
26 03 2022
Historique:
received:
30
12
2021
accepted:
15
03
2022
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The suitability of geospatial services for auditing neighbourhood features relevant to pediatric obesity remains largely unexplored. Our objectives were to (i) establish the measurement properties of a desk-based audit instrument that uses Google Street View On-site audits of 55 street- and neighbourhood-level features were completed in 2008 in 512 neighbourhoods from the QUALITY cohort study. In 2015, both repeat on-site and desk-based audits were completed in a random sample of 30 of these neighbourhoods. Agreement between both methods was excellent for almost all street segment items (range 91.9-99.7%), except for road type (81.0%), ads/commercial billboards (81.7%), road-sidewalk buffer zone (76.1%), and road-bicycle path buffer zone (53.3%). It was fair to poor for perceived quality, safety and aesthetics items (range 59.9-87.6%), as well as for general impression items (range 40.0-86.7%). The desk-based method over-detected commercial billboards and road-sidewalk buffer zone, and generally rated neighbourhoods as less safe, requiring more effort to get around, and having less aesthetic appeal. Change detected over the 8-year period was generally similar for both methods, except that the desk-based method appeared to amplify the increase in the number of segments with signs of social disorder. The QUALITY-NHOOD tool is deemed adequate for evaluating and monitoring changes in pedestrian- and traffic-related features applicable to pediatric populations. Applications for monitoring the obesogenic nature of neighbourhoods appear warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The suitability of geospatial services for auditing neighbourhood features relevant to pediatric obesity remains largely unexplored. Our objectives were to (i) establish the measurement properties of a desk-based audit instrument that uses Google Street View
METHODS
On-site audits of 55 street- and neighbourhood-level features were completed in 2008 in 512 neighbourhoods from the QUALITY cohort study. In 2015, both repeat on-site and desk-based audits were completed in a random sample of 30 of these neighbourhoods.
RESULTS
Agreement between both methods was excellent for almost all street segment items (range 91.9-99.7%), except for road type (81.0%), ads/commercial billboards (81.7%), road-sidewalk buffer zone (76.1%), and road-bicycle path buffer zone (53.3%). It was fair to poor for perceived quality, safety and aesthetics items (range 59.9-87.6%), as well as for general impression items (range 40.0-86.7%). The desk-based method over-detected commercial billboards and road-sidewalk buffer zone, and generally rated neighbourhoods as less safe, requiring more effort to get around, and having less aesthetic appeal. Change detected over the 8-year period was generally similar for both methods, except that the desk-based method appeared to amplify the increase in the number of segments with signs of social disorder.
CONCLUSIONS
The QUALITY-NHOOD tool is deemed adequate for evaluating and monitoring changes in pedestrian- and traffic-related features applicable to pediatric populations. Applications for monitoring the obesogenic nature of neighbourhoods appear warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35346220
doi: 10.1186/s12942-022-00301-8
pii: 10.1186/s12942-022-00301-8
pmc: PMC8961916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-119512
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-97853
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : OHF-69442
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : NMD-94067
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Roberts KC, Shields M, de Groh M, Aziz A, Gilbert JA. Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: results from the 2009 to 2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2012;23(3):37–41.
pubmed: 23061263
van der Klaauw AA, Farooqi IS. The Hunger Genes: Pathways to Obesity. Cell. 2015;161(1):119–32.
pubmed: 25815990
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.008
Bleich SN, Segal J, Wu Y, Wilson R, Wang Y. Systematic review of community-based childhood obesity prevention studies. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):e201–10.
pubmed: 23753099
pmcid: 3691541
doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0886
Showell NN, Fawole O, Segal J, Wilson RF, Cheskin LJ, Bleich SN, et al. A systematic review of home-based childhood obesity prevention studies. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):e193-200.
pubmed: 23753095
pmcid: 3691540
doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0786
Oliver M, Mavoa S, Badland H, Parker K, Donovan P, Kearns RA, et al. Associations between the neighbourhood built environment and out of school physical activity and active travel: an examination from the Kids in the City study. Health Place. 2015;36:57–64.
pubmed: 26432167
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.005
Laxer RE, Janssen I. The proportion of youths’ physical inactivity attributable to neighbourhood built environment features. Int J Health Geogr. 2013;12:31.
pubmed: 23777593
pmcid: 3689048
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-31
Kligerman M, Sallis JF, Ryan S, Frank LD, Nader PR. Association of neighborhood design and recreation environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21(4):274–7.
pubmed: 17375494
doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4.274
Mecredy G, Pickett W, Janssen I. Street connectivity is negatively associated with physical activity in Canadian youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(8):3333–50.
pubmed: 21909310
pmcid: 3166746
doi: 10.3390/ijerph8083333
Carver A, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Neighborhood road environments and physical activity among youth: the CLAN study. J Urban Health. 2008;85(4):532–44.
pubmed: 18437579
pmcid: 2443253
doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9284-9
Gardsjord HS, Tveit MS, Nordh H. Promoting youth’s physical activity through park design: linking theory and practice in a public health perspective. Landsc Res. 2014;39(1):70–81.
doi: 10.1080/01426397.2013.793764
Hsieh S, Klassen AC, Curriero FC, Caulfield LE, Cheskin LJ, Davis JN, et al. Built environment associations with adiposity parameters among overweight and obese hispanic youth. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:406–12.
pubmed: 26339570
pmcid: 4554331
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.05.005
Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ, Slater SJ, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The availability of local-area commercial physical activity-related facilities and physical activity among adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4 Suppl):S292-300.
pubmed: 17884577
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.002
Smith M, Hosking J, Woodward A, Witten K, MacMillan A, Field A, et al. Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport—an update and new findings on health equity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:158.
pubmed: 29145884
pmcid: 5693449
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
Timperio A, Jeffery RW, Crawford D, Roberts R, Giles-Corti B, Ball K. Neighbourhood physical activity environments and adiposity in children and mothers: a three-year longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:18.
pubmed: 20170507
pmcid: 2847539
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-18
Bell J, Wilson JS, Liu GC. Neighborhood greenness and 2-Year changes in body mass index of children and youth. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(6):547–53.
pubmed: 19000844
pmcid: 2649717
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.07.006
Sanders T, Feng X, Fahey PP, Lonsdale C, Astell-Burt T. Green Space and child weight status: does outcome measurement matter? Evidence from an Australian longitudinal study. J Obes. 2015;2015:194838.
pubmed: 26421185
pmcid: 4572428
doi: 10.1155/2015/194838
Morgan Hughey S, Kaczynski AT, Child S, Moore JB, Porter D, Hibbert J. Green and lean: Is neighborhood park and playground availability associated with youth obesity? Variations by gender, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity. Prev Med. 2017;95(Suppl):S101–8.
pubmed: 27932053
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.024
Grafova IB. Overweight children: assessing the contribution of the built environment. Prev Med. 2008;47(3):304–8.
pubmed: 18539318
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.012
Cohen DA, Han B, Isacoff J, Shulaker B, Williamson S, Marsh T, et al. Impact of park renovations on park use and park-based physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(2):289–95.
pubmed: 24956608
doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0165
Vanwolleghem G, Van Dyck D, Ducheyne F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. Assessing the environmental characteristics of cycling routes to school: a study on the reliability and validity of a Google Street View-based audit. Int J Health Geogr. 2014;13:19.
pubmed: 24913256
pmcid: 4063420
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-19
Van Hulst A, Gauvin L, Kestens Y, Barnett TA. Neighborhood built and social environment characteristics: a multilevel analysis of associations with obesity among children and their parents. Int J Obes. 2013;37(10):1328–35.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.81
Gauvin L, Richard L, Craig CL, Spivock M, Riva M, Forster M, et al. From walkability to active living potential: an “ecometric” validation study. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):126–33.
pubmed: 15694520
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.029
Mujahid MS, Diez Roux AV, Morenoff JD, Raghunathan T. Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(8):858–67.
pubmed: 17329713
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm040
Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4 Suppl):S99-123.e12.
pubmed: 19285216
pmcid: 2844244
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
Charreire H, Mackenbach JD, Ouasti M, Lakerveld J, Compernolle S, Ben-Rebah M, et al. Using remote sensing to define environmental characteristics related to physical activity and dietary behaviours: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project). Health Place. 2014;25:1–9.
pubmed: 24211730
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.017
Steinmetz-Wood M, Velauthapillai K, O’Brien G, Ross NA. Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS). BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1246.
pubmed: 31500596
pmcid: 6734502
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3
Bethlehem JR, Mackenbach JD, Ben-Rebah M, Compernolle S, Glonti K, Bardos H, et al. The SPOTLIGHT virtual audit tool: a valid and reliable tool to assess obesogenic characteristics of the built environment. Int J Health Geogr. 2014;13:52.
pubmed: 25515179
pmcid: 4279584
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-52
Griew P, Hillsdon M, Foster C, Coombes E, Jones A, Wilkinson P. Developing and testing a street audit tool using Google Street View to measure environmental supportiveness for physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:103.
pubmed: 23972205
pmcid: 3765385
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-103
Clarke P, Ailshire J, Melendez R, Bader M, Morenoff J. Using Google Earth to conduct a neighborhood audit: reliability of a virtual audit instrument. Health Place. 2010;16(6):1224–9.
pubmed: 20797897
pmcid: 2952684
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.007
Rundle AG, Bader MDM, Richards CA, Neckerman KM, Teitler JO. Using Google street view to audit neighborhood environments. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(1):94–100.
pubmed: 21146773
pmcid: 3031144
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034
Badland HM, Opit S, Witten K, Kearns RA, Mavoa S. Can virtual streetscape audits reliably replace physical streetscape audits? J Urban Health. 2010;87(6):1007–16.
pubmed: 21104331
pmcid: 3005090
doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x
Ben-Joseph E, Lee JS, Cromley EK, Laden F, Troped PJ. Virtual and actual: relative accuracy of on-site and web-based instruments in auditing the environment for physical activity. Health Place. 2013;19:138–50.
pubmed: 23247423
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.11.001
Odgers CL, Caspi A, Bates CJ, Sampson RJ, Moffitt TE. Systematic social observation of children’s neighborhoods using Google Street View: a reliable and cost-effective method. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53(10):1009–17.
pubmed: 22676812
pmcid: 3537178
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02565.x
Phillips CB, Engelberg JK, Geremia CM, Zhu W, Kurka JM, Cain KL, et al. Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods. Int J Health Geogr. 2017;16(1):27.
pubmed: 28778205
pmcid: 5545045
doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0101-0
Kelly CM, Wilson JS, Baker EA, Miller DK, Schootman M. Using Google Street View to audit the built environment: inter-rater reliability results. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45(Suppl 1):S108–12.
pubmed: 23054943
doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9419-9
Wilson JS, Kelly CM, Schootman M, Baker EA, Banerjee A, Clennin M, et al. Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(2):193–9.
pubmed: 22261217
pmcid: 3263366
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.029
Mooney SJ, Bader MD, Lovasi GS, Neckerman KM, Teitler JO, Rundle AG. Validity of an ecometric neighborhood physical disorder measure constructed by virtual street audit. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(6):626–35.
pubmed: 25122584
pmcid: 4157697
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu180
Mooney SJ, Bader MDM, Lovasi GS, Teitler JO, Koenen KC, Aiello AE, et al. Street audits to measure neighborhood disorder: virtual or in-person? Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(3):265–73.
pubmed: 28899028
pmcid: 5860155
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx004
Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization technical report series. 1995;854:1–452.
Lambert M, Van Hulst A, O’Loughlin J, Tremblay A, Barnett TA, Charron H, et al. Cohort profile: the Quebec adipose and lifestyle investigation in youth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1533–44.
pubmed: 21785124
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr111
Daniel M, Y K. MEGAPHONE: Montreal Epidemiological and Geographical Analysis of Population Health Outcomes and Neighbourhood Effects (fully relational, semi-automated geographic information system integrating extensive inventories of social/physical environmental exposure and health outcomes data). In: Montréal CdrdChdlUd, editor. Montreal, Canada2007.
Paquet C, Cargo M, Kestens Y, Daniel M. Reliability of an instrument for direct observation of urban neighbourhoods. Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;97:194–201.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.001
Paquet C, Cargo M, Kestens Y, Daniel M. Reliability of an instrument for direct observation of urban neighbourhoods. Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;97(3):194–201.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.001
Hoehner CM, Ivy A, Ramirez LK, Handy S, Brownson RC. Active neighborhood checklist: a user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness. Am J Health Prom. 2007;21(6):534–7.
doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.6.534
Pikora TJ, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(3):187–94.
pubmed: 12350451
doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
QUebec Adipose and Lifestyle InvesTigation in Youth Montréal: Centre de recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine; 2009 [updated 2017/08/30. http://www.etudequalitystudy.ca .
Barnett TA, Ghenadenik AE, Van Hulst A, Contreras G, Kestens Y, Chaix B, et al. Neighborhood built environment typologies and adiposity in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2021.
Pontius RG, Millones M. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 2011;32(15):4407–29.
doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.552923
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257–68.
pubmed: 15733050
doi: 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
Aghaabbasi M, Moeinaddini M, Shah MZ, Asadi-Shekari Z. Addressing issues in the use of Google tools for assessing pedestrian built environments. J Transp Geogr. 2018;73:185–98.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.10.004
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Cho PM. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2003.
doi: 10.1002/0471445428
Barlow W. Modeling of Categorical Agreement. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. The Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 541–5.
Bird ME, Datta GD, van Hulst A, Kestens Y, Barnett TA. A reliability assessment of a direct-observation park evaluation tool: the parks, activity and recreation among kids (PARK) tool. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:906.
pubmed: 26380967
pmcid: 4573305
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2209-0