Reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic metroplasty for women with T-shaped uterus: a retrospective study.
Hysteroscopic metroplasty
Infertility
Reproductive outcome
T-shaped uterus
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2022
28 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
16
12
2021
accepted:
09
03
2022
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
31
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
T-shaped uterus is a Müllerian malformation with unapparent clinical manifestations. Intrauterine adhesion and tuberculosis may lead to T-shaped uterus, too. Hysteroscopic metroplasty is a treatment option for T-shaped uterus, while the postoperative reproductive outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the reproductive outcome in Chinese women with T-shaped uterus who had hysteroscopic metroplasty with cold scissors. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the reproductive surgery unit of a university-affiliated hospital. One hundred and eleven patients with T-shaped uterus who underwent hysteroscopic metroplasty from Jan. 2017 to Sept. 2019 were followed-up by telephone in Apr. 2021. All patients received hysteroscopic metroplasty using microcissors, followed by estrogen-progesterone sequential treatment, with or without intrauterine device (IUD) implantation. According to whether they had had history of intrauterine operation, patients were divided into congenital group and acquired group. The main outcome measure was postoperative live birth rate. χ One hundred and eleven patients were included in total, with 46 in congenital group and 65 in acquired group. After hysteroscopic metroplasty, in the congenital group, the pregnancy rate increased from 28.3% to 87.0% (P < 0.001) and the live birth rate increased from 23.1% to 79.5% (P = 0.001); in the acquired group, the pregnancy rate slightly dropped from 98.5% to 72.3% (P < 0.001) while the live birth rate increased from 20.8% to 74.5% (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative reproductive outcome indicators between the two subgroups except mode of conception. For both groups, hysteroscopic metroplasty may improve reproductive outcomes for patients with T-shaped uterus. As a Müllerian malformation, T-shaped uterus is named for the shape of the uterine cavity. According to cause of the disease and patients’ intrauterine operation history, T-shaped uterus can be divided into congenital and acquired types.This study was conducted in the reproductive surgery unit in a university-affiliated hospital. Data were collected from medical records, and patients were followed up via telephone.One hundred and eleven patients were included in this study, with 46 in congenital group and 65 in acquired group. Whether infertility/subfertility patients had had intrauterine operation history or not, their rates of giving live birth increased after the hysteroscopic metroplasty.In conclusion, hysteroscopic metroplasty is an effective intervention for T-shaped uterus patients with fertility intention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
T-shaped uterus is a Müllerian malformation with unapparent clinical manifestations. Intrauterine adhesion and tuberculosis may lead to T-shaped uterus, too. Hysteroscopic metroplasty is a treatment option for T-shaped uterus, while the postoperative reproductive outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the reproductive outcome in Chinese women with T-shaped uterus who had hysteroscopic metroplasty with cold scissors.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the reproductive surgery unit of a university-affiliated hospital. One hundred and eleven patients with T-shaped uterus who underwent hysteroscopic metroplasty from Jan. 2017 to Sept. 2019 were followed-up by telephone in Apr. 2021. All patients received hysteroscopic metroplasty using microcissors, followed by estrogen-progesterone sequential treatment, with or without intrauterine device (IUD) implantation. According to whether they had had history of intrauterine operation, patients were divided into congenital group and acquired group. The main outcome measure was postoperative live birth rate. χ
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and eleven patients were included in total, with 46 in congenital group and 65 in acquired group. After hysteroscopic metroplasty, in the congenital group, the pregnancy rate increased from 28.3% to 87.0% (P < 0.001) and the live birth rate increased from 23.1% to 79.5% (P = 0.001); in the acquired group, the pregnancy rate slightly dropped from 98.5% to 72.3% (P < 0.001) while the live birth rate increased from 20.8% to 74.5% (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative reproductive outcome indicators between the two subgroups except mode of conception.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
For both groups, hysteroscopic metroplasty may improve reproductive outcomes for patients with T-shaped uterus.
As a Müllerian malformation, T-shaped uterus is named for the shape of the uterine cavity. According to cause of the disease and patients’ intrauterine operation history, T-shaped uterus can be divided into congenital and acquired types.This study was conducted in the reproductive surgery unit in a university-affiliated hospital. Data were collected from medical records, and patients were followed up via telephone.One hundred and eleven patients were included in this study, with 46 in congenital group and 65 in acquired group. Whether infertility/subfertility patients had had intrauterine operation history or not, their rates of giving live birth increased after the hysteroscopic metroplasty.In conclusion, hysteroscopic metroplasty is an effective intervention for T-shaped uterus patients with fertility intention.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
As a Müllerian malformation, T-shaped uterus is named for the shape of the uterine cavity. According to cause of the disease and patients’ intrauterine operation history, T-shaped uterus can be divided into congenital and acquired types.This study was conducted in the reproductive surgery unit in a university-affiliated hospital. Data were collected from medical records, and patients were followed up via telephone.One hundred and eleven patients were included in this study, with 46 in congenital group and 65 in acquired group. Whether infertility/subfertility patients had had intrauterine operation history or not, their rates of giving live birth increased after the hysteroscopic metroplasty.In conclusion, hysteroscopic metroplasty is an effective intervention for T-shaped uterus patients with fertility intention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35346261
doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01381-2
pii: 10.1186/s12978-022-01381-2
pmc: PMC8962238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78Subventions
Organisme : Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
ID : 19411960300
Organisme : Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
ID : 2019SY002
Organisme : Shanghai Hospital Development Center
ID : SHDC12019113
Organisme : Shanghai Municipality: Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan
ID : Year 2019
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):899-915
pubmed: 12413972
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1730-4
pubmed: 21398337
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):389-390
pubmed: 32920144
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jul;226:30-34
pubmed: 29804025
Fertil Steril. 2019 Aug;112(2):399-400
pubmed: 31133386
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;41(1):41-3
pubmed: 8821883
Int J Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;8(1):13-20
pubmed: 24696765
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 12;10(2):
pubmed: 33445663
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 May;4(3):385-91
pubmed: 9154791
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Feb;30(2):166-74
pubmed: 25498593
Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2751-5
pubmed: 9804225
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;51(1):3-9
pubmed: 26898998
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Jan;48(1):39-44
pubmed: 30355504
BJOG. 2002 Dec;109(12):1331-4
pubmed: 12504966
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):366-377
pubmed: 32898287
Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1028-32
pubmed: 22542142
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020 Jul;75(7):431-444
pubmed: 32735685
Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Mar-Apr;8(2):141-54
pubmed: 12099629
Reprod Sci. 2018 Dec;25(12):1649-1654
pubmed: 29402197
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):815-829
pubmed: 31432589
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(3):183-8
pubmed: 21150155
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;15(3):135-140
pubmed: 30202621
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;70:28-50
pubmed: 33358154
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar - Apr;27(3):755-762
pubmed: 31146029
Gynecol Surg. 2013 Aug;10(3):199-212
pubmed: 23894234
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Aug;286(2):525-30
pubmed: 22535194
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):140-4
pubmed: 19249047
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:173-178
pubmed: 31570176