A framework to guide storytelling as a knowledge translation intervention for health-promoting behaviour change.
Behaviour change
Framework
Health promotion
Knowledge translation
Storytelling
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2022
28 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
07
10
2021
accepted:
12
03
2022
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
30
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stories can be a powerful tool to increase uptake of health information, a key goal of knowledge translation (KT). Systematic reviews demonstrate that storytelling (i.e. sharing stories) can be effective in changing health-promoting behaviours. Though an attractive KT strategy, storytelling is a complex approach requiring careful planning and consideration of multiple factors. We sought to develop a framework to assist KT researchers and practitioners in health contexts to consider and develop effective KT interventions that include stories or storytelling. We conducted a broad search of the literature to identify studies that used storytelling as a KT intervention across different disciplines: health research, education, policy development, anthropology, organizational development, technology research, and media. We extracted purposes, theories, models, mechanisms, and outcomes and then mapped the theoretical and practical considerations from the literature onto the Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions. The theoretical and practical considerations uncovered comprised the basis of the storytelling framework development. Through discussion and consensus, methodological experts refined and revised the framework for completeness, accuracy, nuance, and usability. We used a complex intervention lens paired with existing behaviour change techniques to guide appropriate theory-based intervention planning and practical choices. An intentional approach to the development of story-based KT interventions should involve three phases. The theory phase specifies the goal of the intervention, mechanisms of action, and behaviour change techniques that will achieve the intended effects. The modelling phase involves development and testing using an iterative approach, multiple methods and engagement of end-users. Finally, formal evaluation using multiple methods helps determine whether the intervention is having its intended effects and value added. This framework provides practical guidance for designing story-based KT interventions. The framework was designed to make explicit the requisite considerations when determining the appropriateness and/or feasibility of storytelling KT, clarify intervention goals and audience, and subsequently, support the development and testing of storytelling interventions. The framework presents considerations as opposed to being prescriptive. The framework also offers an opportunity to further develop theory and the KT community's understanding of effectiveness and mechanisms of action in storytelling interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Stories can be a powerful tool to increase uptake of health information, a key goal of knowledge translation (KT). Systematic reviews demonstrate that storytelling (i.e. sharing stories) can be effective in changing health-promoting behaviours. Though an attractive KT strategy, storytelling is a complex approach requiring careful planning and consideration of multiple factors. We sought to develop a framework to assist KT researchers and practitioners in health contexts to consider and develop effective KT interventions that include stories or storytelling.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a broad search of the literature to identify studies that used storytelling as a KT intervention across different disciplines: health research, education, policy development, anthropology, organizational development, technology research, and media. We extracted purposes, theories, models, mechanisms, and outcomes and then mapped the theoretical and practical considerations from the literature onto the Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions. The theoretical and practical considerations uncovered comprised the basis of the storytelling framework development. Through discussion and consensus, methodological experts refined and revised the framework for completeness, accuracy, nuance, and usability.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We used a complex intervention lens paired with existing behaviour change techniques to guide appropriate theory-based intervention planning and practical choices. An intentional approach to the development of story-based KT interventions should involve three phases. The theory phase specifies the goal of the intervention, mechanisms of action, and behaviour change techniques that will achieve the intended effects. The modelling phase involves development and testing using an iterative approach, multiple methods and engagement of end-users. Finally, formal evaluation using multiple methods helps determine whether the intervention is having its intended effects and value added.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This framework provides practical guidance for designing story-based KT interventions. The framework was designed to make explicit the requisite considerations when determining the appropriateness and/or feasibility of storytelling KT, clarify intervention goals and audience, and subsequently, support the development and testing of storytelling interventions. The framework presents considerations as opposed to being prescriptive. The framework also offers an opportunity to further develop theory and the KT community's understanding of effectiveness and mechanisms of action in storytelling interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35346397
doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00282-6
pii: 10.1186/s43058-022-00282-6
pmc: PMC8962242
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
35Subventions
Organisme : Alberta Innovates
ID : G2019000663
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Sep 04;74:28781
pubmed: 26343881
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):455-9
pubmed: 22770814
J Health Commun. 2011 Aug;16(7):686-97
pubmed: 21541875
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
J Transcult Nurs. 2015 Sep;26(4):346-53
pubmed: 24829264
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):885-900
pubmed: 26290002
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):186
pubmed: 29871611
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):318-24
pubmed: 24420004
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Apr;10(2):186-91
pubmed: 19372280
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6
pubmed: 25384822
J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(11):1499-1517
pubmed: 27387514
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):327-337
pubmed: 31025444
Health Psychol. 2015 Apr;34(4):303-13
pubmed: 25133831
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):708-720
pubmed: 30452535
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 29;15:1311
pubmed: 26715465
BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7
pubmed: 17615222
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Sep 02;10:64
pubmed: 20813044
Psychol Health. 2012;27(11):1308-22
pubmed: 22519724
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):647-658
pubmed: 29341347
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):701-21
pubmed: 11079236
Res Soc Work Pract. 2009 Sep 1;19(5):503-518
pubmed: 20976022
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209912
pubmed: 30596749
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1606-14
pubmed: 23948015
Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):674-82
pubmed: 21895370
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92
pubmed: 23159157
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69
pubmed: 18474969
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Oct;11(5):316-24
pubmed: 25132050
J Nurs Educ. 2010 May;49(5):287-90
pubmed: 20143754
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):48-50
pubmed: 9872892
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 14;19(12):e412
pubmed: 29242180
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547