Three Learning Organizations in Cataract Surgery: The Example of Intracameral Antibiotic Injection.
Journal
The Permanente journal
ISSN: 1552-5775
Titre abrégé: Perm J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9800474
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 05 2021
19 05 2021
Historique:
received:
13
10
2020
accepted:
22
01
2021
entrez:
29
3
2022
pubmed:
30
3
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The recent systematic adoption of intracameral antibiotic injection during cataract surgery in Sweden, India, and the US serves as a model for the successful transitioning of local quality improvement initiatives to organization-wide implementation. Although the delivery of eye care in the 3 countries is distinctly organized with differing governances and technological infrastructure, each contains elements of a learning organization (ie, an organization that has adopted a culture of creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge into practice through system-level and clinician-level change). We describe a retrospective and organizational implementation study of intracameral antibiotic injection in Sweden, through the efforts of the National Cataract Registry; in the US by Kaiser Permanente; and in India by the Aravind Eye Hospital System. Leadership structure, training in problem solving, benchmarking, sharing of technical knowledge, and data and workforce engagement are compared. Each of the 3 organizations share the key elements of effective leadership, which values the exchange of ideas in the workforce, training and resourcing for change, and information management in the form of benchmarking and data sharing. In the case of intracameral antibiotic injection, a new technique was identified to improve quality and safety with a reduction in infections as evidence of the success of the programs. Committing to a culture of collective learning, and leveraging each stakeholder's personal investment, health-care systems may improve care delivery and set new benchmarks in quality and safety.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The recent systematic adoption of intracameral antibiotic injection during cataract surgery in Sweden, India, and the US serves as a model for the successful transitioning of local quality improvement initiatives to organization-wide implementation. Although the delivery of eye care in the 3 countries is distinctly organized with differing governances and technological infrastructure, each contains elements of a learning organization (ie, an organization that has adopted a culture of creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge into practice through system-level and clinician-level change).
METHODS
We describe a retrospective and organizational implementation study of intracameral antibiotic injection in Sweden, through the efforts of the National Cataract Registry; in the US by Kaiser Permanente; and in India by the Aravind Eye Hospital System. Leadership structure, training in problem solving, benchmarking, sharing of technical knowledge, and data and workforce engagement are compared.
RESULTS
Each of the 3 organizations share the key elements of effective leadership, which values the exchange of ideas in the workforce, training and resourcing for change, and information management in the form of benchmarking and data sharing. In the case of intracameral antibiotic injection, a new technique was identified to improve quality and safety with a reduction in infections as evidence of the success of the programs.
CONCLUSION
Committing to a culture of collective learning, and leveraging each stakeholder's personal investment, health-care systems may improve care delivery and set new benchmarks in quality and safety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35348065
doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.274
pmc: PMC8822932
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):971-978
pubmed: 30049565
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):1887-96.e1
pubmed: 19560825
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):302-308
pubmed: 26522705
Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126(5):655-662
pubmed: 30572076
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):978-88
pubmed: 17531690
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1226-1233
pubmed: 31371152
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 26;10:2121-2127
pubmed: 27822008
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1):8-14
pubmed: 23036356
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jun;28(6):977-81
pubmed: 12036639
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Dec;37(12):532-43
pubmed: 22235538
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1):15-21
pubmed: 23245359
Ocul Surf. 2020 Jan;18(1):186-189
pubmed: 31726110
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Feb;83(1):7-10
pubmed: 15715550
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jun;124(6):768-775
pubmed: 28214101
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;12(6):457-8
pubmed: 11202598
Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):866-70
pubmed: 17324467
Harv Bus Rev. 1993 Jul-Aug;71(4):78-91
pubmed: 10127041
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 1;15(1):16
pubmed: 28249608
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):287-294
pubmed: 26459998
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;40(9):1568
pubmed: 25135553
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 May;123(5):613-20
pubmed: 15883279