[Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what mattersGasto em atenção primária à saúde nas Américas: calcular o que importa].

Gasto en atención primaria en salud en las Américas: medir lo que importa.
Primary health care health expenditures measurements methods and theories

Journal

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health
ISSN: 1680-5348
Titre abrégé: Rev Panam Salud Publica
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9705400

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 17 08 2021
accepted: 21 12 2021
entrez: 30 3 2022
pubmed: 31 3 2022
medline: 31 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: 1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; 2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and 3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The 30% target for current healthcare spending on PHC proposed by Compact 30-30-30 (Pan American Health Organization) would be surpassed by the WHO definition, but it would be far from achieved by the OECD definition. The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences. Este informe especial apresenta uma comparação entre o cálculo do gasto em atenção primária à saúde (APS) conforme os métodos propostos pela Organização para a Cooperação e o Desenvolvimento Econômico (OCDE) e pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), segundo a metodologia

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (por)
Este informe especial apresenta uma comparação entre o cálculo do gasto em atenção primária à saúde (APS) conforme os métodos propostos pela Organização para a Cooperação e o Desenvolvimento Econômico (OCDE) e pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), segundo a metodologia

Identifiants

pubmed: 35350460
doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.13
pii: RPSP.2022.13
pmc: PMC8942294
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

spa

Pagination

e13

Références

BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Feb 21;4(1):e001497
pubmed: 30997157
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):792-800
pubmed: 33177776
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Jun 11;45:e72
pubmed: 34131425

Auteurs

Magdalena Rathe (M)

Fundación Plenitud Santo Domingo República Dominicana Fundación Plenitud, Santo Domingo, República Dominicana.

Patricia Hernández-Peña (P)

Consultora Ámsterdam Países Bajos Consultora, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos.

Claudia Pescetto (C)

Organización Panamericana de la Salud Washington, D.C. Estados Unidos de América Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, D.C., Estados Unidos de América.

Cornelis Van Mosseveld (C)

Consultor La Haya Países Bajos Consultor, La Haya, Países Bajos.

Maria Angélica Borges Dos Santos (MA)

Fundación Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro Brasil Fundación Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Laura Rivas (L)

Organización Mundial de la Salud Ginebra Suiza Organización Mundial de la Salud, Ginebra, Suiza.

Classifications MeSH