Fetal reduction of triplet pregnancies to twins vs singletons: a meta-analysis of survival and pregnancy outcome.
fetal reduction
meta-analysis
pregnancy outcome
triplet pregnancy
twin pregnancy
Journal
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
01
11
2021
revised:
22
03
2022
accepted:
22
03
2022
pubmed:
31
3
2022
medline:
30
8
2022
entrez:
30
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the fetal survival rate and perinatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies after selective reduction to twin pregnancies vs singleton pregnancies. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to January 16, 2022. Studies comparing the survival and perinatal outcomes between reduction to twin pregnancies and reduction to singleton pregnancies were included. The primary outcomes were fetal survival, defined as a live birth at >24 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were gestational age at birth, preterm birth at <32 and <34 weeks of gestation, early pregnancy loss (<24 weeks of gestation), low birthweight, and rate of neonatal demise (up to 28 days after birth). The random-effect model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. To provide a range of expected effects if a new study was conducted, 95% prediction intervals were calculated for outcomes presented in >3 studies. Of note, 10 studies with 2543 triplet pregnancies undergoing fetal reduction, of which 2035 reduced to twin pregnancies and 508 reduced to singleton pregnancies, met the inclusion criteria. Reduction to twin pregnancies had a lower rate of fetal survival (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.92; P=.02; 95% prediction interval, 0.36-1.03) and comparable rates of early pregnancy loss (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.38; P=.61; 95% prediction interval, 0.54-1.48) and neonatal demise (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-3.50; P=.55) than reduction to singleton pregnancies. Reduction to twin pregnancies had a significantly lower gestation age at birth (weeks) (mean difference, -2.20; 95% confidence interval, -2.80 to -1.61; P<.001; 95% prediction interval, -4.27 to -0.14) than reduction to singleton pregnancies. Furthermore, reduction to twin pregnancies was associated with lower birthweight and greater risk of preterm birth at <32 and <34 weeks of gestation. Triplet pregnancies reduced to twin pregnancies had a lower fetal survival rate of all remaining fetuses, lower gestational age at birth, higher risk of preterm birth, and lower birthweight than triplet pregnancies reduced to singleton pregnancies; reduction to twin pregnancies vs reduction to singleton pregnancies showed no substantial difference for the rates of early pregnancy loss and neonatal death.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35351408
pii: S0002-9378(22)00229-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.050
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
430-439.e5Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.