Modifiable lifestyle-related prognostic factors for the onset of chronic spinal pain: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.


Journal

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1877-0665
Titre abrégé: Ann Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101502773

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 03 01 2021
revised: 11 02 2022
accepted: 16 02 2022
pubmed: 31 3 2022
medline: 23 11 2022
entrez: 30 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stratified approaches to spinal pain that address psychosocial risk factors reduce long-term disability to a moderate extent. Identifying and managing other risk factors might help improve outcomes. This systematic review of longitudinal studies aimed to evaluate possible associations between the onset of chronic spinal pain (including low back, back and neck pain) and putative modifiable lifestyle-related risk or protective factors. This systematic review of longitudinal studies published during the last 2 decades followed PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers screened Medline, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, Psycinfo, Science Direct, PTSDpubs and Google Scholar for relevant studies. The QUIPS tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A qualitative meta-synthesis of relevant factors was performed. Of 3716 unique records, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria (10 with low risk of bias and 4 moderate risk of bias). The highest bias observed was attrition. For chronic low back pain, we found moderate evidence for the involvement of high body weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference and conflicting evidence for high body mass index (BMI), smoking, and physical activity. For chronic neck pain, we found strong evidence for high BMI in women, moderate evidence for sleep disorders in women and conflicting evidence for high BMI in men and physical activity. For chronic back pain, we found limited evidence for gardening/yard work in men and more than one adult at home. Effect sizes were small. Several modifiable lifestyle-related factors were identified. Evidence is still sparse and there is a need for more studies. PROSPERO database registration: Ref 172,112 CRD42020172112.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stratified approaches to spinal pain that address psychosocial risk factors reduce long-term disability to a moderate extent. Identifying and managing other risk factors might help improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This systematic review of longitudinal studies aimed to evaluate possible associations between the onset of chronic spinal pain (including low back, back and neck pain) and putative modifiable lifestyle-related risk or protective factors.
METHODS METHODS
This systematic review of longitudinal studies published during the last 2 decades followed PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers screened Medline, Scopus, Pedro, Cochrane Library, Psycinfo, Science Direct, PTSDpubs and Google Scholar for relevant studies. The QUIPS tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A qualitative meta-synthesis of relevant factors was performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 3716 unique records, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria (10 with low risk of bias and 4 moderate risk of bias). The highest bias observed was attrition. For chronic low back pain, we found moderate evidence for the involvement of high body weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference and conflicting evidence for high body mass index (BMI), smoking, and physical activity. For chronic neck pain, we found strong evidence for high BMI in women, moderate evidence for sleep disorders in women and conflicting evidence for high BMI in men and physical activity. For chronic back pain, we found limited evidence for gardening/yard work in men and more than one adult at home. Effect sizes were small.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Several modifiable lifestyle-related factors were identified. Evidence is still sparse and there is a need for more studies. PROSPERO database registration: Ref 172,112 CRD42020172112.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35351652
pii: S1877-0657(22)00033-1
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101660
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101660

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest None declared.

Auteurs

Adrien Manderlier (A)

Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate 10/1650, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Maxime de Fooz (M)

Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate 10/1650, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Sophie Patris (S)

Psychology, Education and Motor Sciences Library, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10/L3.05.01, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Anne Berquin (A)

Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate 10/1650, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 53, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: anne.berquin@uclouvain.be.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH