Heightened Microbial Translocation Is a Prognostic Biomarker of Recurrent Tuberculosis.


Journal

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 11 2022
Historique:
received: 01 02 2022
pubmed: 31 3 2022
medline: 18 11 2022
entrez: 30 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Microbial translocation is a known characteristic of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Whether microbial translocation is also a biomarker of recurrence in PTB is not known. We examined the presence of microbial translocation in a cohort of newly diagnosed, sputum smear, and culture positive individuals with drug-sensitive PTB. Participants were followed up for a year following the end of anti-tuberculosis treatment. They were classified as cases (in the event of recurrence, n = 30) and compared to age and gender matched controls (in the event of successful, recurrence free cure; n = 51). Plasma samples were used to measure the circulating microbial translocation markers. All the enrolled study participants were treatment naïve, HIV negative and with or without diabetes mellitus. Baseline levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (P = .0002), sCD14 (P = .0191), and LPS-binding protein (LBP) (P < .0001) were significantly higher in recurrence than controls and were associated with increased risk for recurrence, whereas intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) and Endocab showed no association. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated the utility of these individual microbial markers in discriminating recurrence from cure with high sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Recurrence following microbiological cure in PTB is characterized by heightened baseline microbial translocation. These markers can be used as a rapid prognostic tool for predicting recurrence in PTB.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Microbial translocation is a known characteristic of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Whether microbial translocation is also a biomarker of recurrence in PTB is not known.
METHODS
We examined the presence of microbial translocation in a cohort of newly diagnosed, sputum smear, and culture positive individuals with drug-sensitive PTB. Participants were followed up for a year following the end of anti-tuberculosis treatment. They were classified as cases (in the event of recurrence, n = 30) and compared to age and gender matched controls (in the event of successful, recurrence free cure; n = 51). Plasma samples were used to measure the circulating microbial translocation markers. All the enrolled study participants were treatment naïve, HIV negative and with or without diabetes mellitus.
RESULTS
Baseline levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (P = .0002), sCD14 (P = .0191), and LPS-binding protein (LBP) (P < .0001) were significantly higher in recurrence than controls and were associated with increased risk for recurrence, whereas intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) and Endocab showed no association. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated the utility of these individual microbial markers in discriminating recurrence from cure with high sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).
CONCLUSIONS
Recurrence following microbiological cure in PTB is characterized by heightened baseline microbial translocation. These markers can be used as a rapid prognostic tool for predicting recurrence in PTB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35352112
pii: 6555776
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac236
pmc: PMC9662171
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1820-1826

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Références

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027754
pubmed: 33258908
Front Microbiol. 2019 Dec 18;10:2789
pubmed: 31921004
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;24(3):727-49
pubmed: 20674801
J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun 15;207(12):1841-9
pubmed: 23479321
Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:149-73
pubmed: 22224779
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016 Jun;10(6):643-54
pubmed: 27030924
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):2143
pubmed: 33495502
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2018 Jan-Mar;7(1):1-6
pubmed: 29516879
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Sep;10(9):655-66
pubmed: 22886237
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e81856
pubmed: 24312369
Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 May;11(5):343-54
pubmed: 21475309
Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Jun;10(6):387-94
pubmed: 20510279
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(6):e1002749
pubmed: 22685406
Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1858
pubmed: 30154770
Nat Med. 2006 Dec;12(12):1365-71
pubmed: 17115046
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5):
pubmed: 30361242
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(10):e1830
pubmed: 23056659
J Immunol. 1996 Aug 1;157(3):1271-8
pubmed: 8757635
Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1501-8
pubmed: 26973015
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e84255
pubmed: 24358350
Pathog Dis. 2017 Apr 1;75(3):
pubmed: 28334088
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257214
pubmed: 34506568
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3419-e3427
pubmed: 32766812
J Biol Chem. 2013 Apr 5;288(14):9729-9741
pubmed: 23430250
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jan;43(1):185-94
pubmed: 23520317
J Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;211(7):1154-63
pubmed: 25336729
Gastroenterology. 2011 Oct;141(4):1220-30, 1230.e1-3
pubmed: 21726511
Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 25;12:631094
pubmed: 33841412
Clin Exp Immunol. 2000 Dec;122(3):350-7
pubmed: 11122240
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):EE01-6
pubmed: 26023563
N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 14;341(16):1174-9
pubmed: 10519895

Auteurs

Nathella Pavan Kumar (NP)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

Kadar Moideen (K)

National Institutes of Health-NIRT- International Center for Excellence in Research, Chennai, India.

Vijay Viswanathan (V)

Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Center, Chennai, India.

Shanmugam Sivakumar (S)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

Shaik Fayaz Ahamed (SF)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

C Ponnuraja (C)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

Syed Hissar (S)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

Hardy Kornfeld (H)

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Subash Babu (S)

National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases (LPD), of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH