Does Gender Impact a Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis?
Journal
ACR open rheumatology
ISSN: 2578-5745
Titre abrégé: ACR Open Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101740025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
revised:
31
01
2022
received:
29
04
2021
accepted:
06
02
2022
pubmed:
31
3
2022
medline:
31
3
2022
entrez:
30
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study objective was to explore differences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis experiences between men and women by examining the coding of health events over the 2 years preceding AS diagnosis. Claims data (January 2006-April 2019) from the MarketScan databases were examined. Patients who had received two or more AS diagnoses at least 30 days apart and had at least 2 years of insurance enrollment before their first AS diagnosis were analyzed. Men were matched 1:1 to women by age, diagnosis date, insurance type, and enrollment duration. Health events (diagnosis and provider codes) were examined over 2 years before AS diagnosis and stratified by gender. Data were analyzed using univariate χ Among 7744 patients, 274 of 1906 AS-related codes showed statistically significant differences between men and women. Women received more diagnosis codes than men across diagnoses and providers; the largest difference in diagnosis codes among women versus men was in peripheral symptom coding (57.7% vs. 43.9%, respectively). More women than men received diagnosis codes for depression (21.2% vs. 9.8%) and other musculoskeletal symptoms (52.8% vs. 40.0%); only gout was more common in men (6.5%) than in women (2.2%). Among men, backache codes gradually increased 12 months before AS diagnosis, whereas axial and sacroiliitis coding increased sharply immediately before diagnosis. The greatest difference in physician types visited was for rheumatologists: 64.2% of women had visits compared with 45.1% of men. Further investigation into the dissimilarities in diagnostic experiences between men and women is needed to determine whether differences are due to disease phenotype or potential cognitive bias influencing diagnostic decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35352497
doi: 10.1002/acr2.11428
pmc: PMC9190217
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
540-546Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR003168
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : 5KL2-TR-003168-02
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Arch Rheumatol. 2015 Aug 16;31(1):24-30
pubmed: 29900990
Rheumatol Int. 2003 Mar;23(2):61-6
pubmed: 12634937
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;29(4):304-310
pubmed: 28394827
Am J Med Sci. 2011 Apr;341(4):284-6
pubmed: 21430444
J Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;45(2):195-201
pubmed: 29419448
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83
pubmed: 19297344
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 24;5:290
pubmed: 30406105
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;65(1):10-5
pubmed: 22118265
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(51):e5652
pubmed: 28002334
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jun;64(6):905-10
pubmed: 22275150
J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):147-52
pubmed: 10718692
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1221-4
pubmed: 23264358
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;31(2):293-7
pubmed: 21796348
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):463-474
pubmed: 30121826
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):419-28
pubmed: 26385369
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;68(7):1669-76
pubmed: 26816002
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61 Suppl 3:iii3-7
pubmed: 12381505
Reumatol Clin. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):83-9
pubmed: 25441489
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jan;56(1):234-43
pubmed: 17195227
BMC Rheumatol. 2019 Sep 23;3:39
pubmed: 31559383
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 31;17:38
pubmed: 27036116
Int J Rheum Dis. 2012 Apr;15(2):163-8
pubmed: 22462419
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;12(4):239-47
pubmed: 10910174
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Mar;48(3):272-6
pubmed: 19151035
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):73-84
pubmed: 28110981
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 107(5):102-107
pubmed: 28967358
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 30;374(26):2563-74
pubmed: 27355535
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;35(7):1769-76
pubmed: 26987341
Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(3):R513-25
pubmed: 15899038
Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Jul;84(4):467-471
pubmed: 27450199
Acta Reumatol Port. 2018 Jan-Mar;43(1):32-39
pubmed: 29342471
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Oct;62(10):1362-9
pubmed: 20506310
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):65-73
pubmed: 23999006
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Sep;65(9):1482-9
pubmed: 23463610
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 May;66(5):633-8
pubmed: 17127685
J Rheumatol. 1993 Nov;20(11):1900-4
pubmed: 8308776
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018 Jun;10(5-6):129-139
pubmed: 29942364
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Apr;92(4):555-564
pubmed: 28233529
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):52-8
pubmed: 23794645
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;68(3):679-89
pubmed: 26473967
Front Cell Neurosci. 2018 Feb 13;12:35
pubmed: 29487504
J Rheumatol. 1985 Feb;12(1):126-9
pubmed: 3872366
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(7):573-579
pubmed: 32303595
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 May 12;20(6):35
pubmed: 29754330
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):617-626
pubmed: 29400009