Development of an affordable, immersive model for robotic vaginal cuff closure: a randomized trial.
Model
Robotic surgery
Training
Vaginal cuff closure
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
13
01
2022
accepted:
16
03
2022
pubmed:
31
3
2022
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
30
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Safe and secure closure of the vaginal cuff is a critical component of a robotic assisted hysterectomy procedure. Our aim in this study is to develop and validate a novel vaginal cuff closure model (VC) created from porcine heart that allows trainees to obtain competency in a low-risk environment. Ten expert and 20 novice robotic surgeons performed a cuff closure exercise on the VC model and on the dV-Trainer
Identifiants
pubmed: 35353300
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01404-x
pii: 10.1007/s11701-022-01404-x
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109-116Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(8):CD003677. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
Almeida OD Jr (2013) Robotic hysterectomy strategies in the morbidly obese patient. JSLS 17(3):418–422. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422521511
doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521511
pubmed: 24018079
pmcid: 3771761
Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, Tarpley J, Mellinger J, Mahvi DM, Kelz RR, Ko CY, Hoyt DB, Lewis FH (2016) Development of the flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial protocol: a national cluster-randomized trial of resident duty hour policies. JAMA Surg 151(3):273–281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4990
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4990
pubmed: 26720622
Moulder JK, Louie M, Toubia T, Schiff LD, Siedhoff MT (2017) The role of simulation and warm-up in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 29(4):212–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000368
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000368
pubmed: 28520585
Zheng B, Hur HC, Johnson S, Swanström LL (2010) Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists. Surg Endosc 24(1):152–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0539-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0539-7
pubmed: 19517182
Committee opinion no. 628: robotic surgery in gynecology (2015) Obstet Gynecol. 125(3):760–767. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000461761.47981.07 .
Gobern JM, Novak CM, Lockrow EG (2011) Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):755–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.004
pubmed: 22024262
Geller EJ, Schuler KM, Boggess JF (2011) Robotic surgical training program in gynecology: how to train residents and fellows. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(2):224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.11.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.11.003
pubmed: 21262591
Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 17(3):171–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346
pubmed: 17581459
Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, Woo R, Reyes R, Hernandez-Boussard T, Dutta S (2010) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 147(6):830–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002
pubmed: 20045162
Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119(2):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03139.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03139.x
pubmed: 21981104
Zerbato D, Dall’Alba D (2017) Role of virtual simulation in surgical training. J Vis Surg 3:23. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.01.11
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.01.11
pubmed: 29078586
pmcid: 5637471
Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032
pubmed: 22099993
Satava RM, Stefanidis D, Levy JS, Smith R, Martin JR, Monfared S, Timsina LR, Darzi AW, Moglia A, Brand TC, Dorin RP, Dumon KR, Francone TD, Georgiou E, Goh AC, Marcet JE, Martino MA, Sudan R, Vale J, Gallagher AG (2020) Proving the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial. Ann Surg 272(2):384–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220
pubmed: 32675553
King CR, Donnellan N, Guido R, Ecker A, Althouse AD, Mansuria S (2015) Development and validation of a laparoscopic simulation model for suturing the vaginal cuff. Obstet Gynecol 126(Suppl 4):27S-35S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001053
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001053
pubmed: 26375557
Arden D, Hacker MR, Jones DB, Awtrey CS (2008) Description and validation of the Pelv-Sim: a training model designed to improve gynecologic minimally invasive suturing skills. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(6):707–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.004
pubmed: 18971133
Jørgensen M, Konge L, Subhi Y (2018) Contrasting groups’ standard setting for consequences analysis in validity studies: reporting considerations. Adv Simul (Lond). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-018-0064-7
doi: 10.1186/s41077-018-0064-7
pubmed: 29556423
Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA (2012) Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(4):284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.026
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.026
pubmed: 21974989
Fuchs Weizman N, Einarsson JI, Wang KC, Vitonis AF, Cohen SL (2015) Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and associated morbidities. JSLS 19(2):e2013.00351. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2013.00351
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2013.00351
pubmed: 25901104
pmcid: 4396054
Agdi M, Al-Ghafri W, Antolin R, Arrington J, O’Kelley K, Thomson AJ, Tulandi T (2009) Vaginal vault dehiscence after hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):313–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.01.006
pubmed: 19285921
Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, Cromi A, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P (2011) Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024
pubmed: 22118963
Tunitsky-Bitton E, Propst K, Muffly T (2016) Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(3):392.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.023
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.023
pubmed: 26640072
Bric J, Connolly M, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28(12):3343–3348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5
pubmed: 24946742
Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Dalinin VV, Mørk BE, Sørhus V, Røtnes JS, Fosse E (2006) Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills. Surg Endosc 20(10):1565–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9270-6
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9270-6
pubmed: 16902750
Kiely DJ, Gotlieb WH, Lau S, Zeng X, Samouelian V, Ramanakumar AV, Zakrzewski H, Brin S, Fraser SA, Korsieporn P, Drudi L, Press JZ (2015) Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Robot Surg 9(3):179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0513-4
doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0513-4
pubmed: 26531197
Dubin AK, Smith R, Julian D, Tanaka A, Mattingly P (2017) A comparison of robotic simulation performance on basic virtual reality skills: simulator subjective versus objective assessment tools. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(7):1184–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019
pubmed: 28757439
Vargas MV, Schwab TD, Robinson JK, Opoku-Anane J, Marfori CQ, Moawad GN (2015) Laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy: a comparison of cost and perioperative outcomes for complex cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(6S):S82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.221
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.221
pubmed: 27679353
Arain NA, Dulan G, Hogg DC, Rege RV, Powers CE, Tesfay ST, Hynan LS, Scott DJ (2012) Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit. Surg Endosc 26(10):2740–2745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2264-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2264-x
pubmed: 22538678
Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A (2016) A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol 69(6):1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021
pubmed: 26433570
Weizman NF, Manoucheri E, Vitonis AF, Hicks GJ, Einarsson JI, Cohen SL (2015) Design and validation of a novel assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing of the vaginal cuff during hysterectomy. J Surg Educ 72(2):212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.015
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.015
Korndorffer JR Jr, Arora S, Sevdalis N, Paige J, McClusky DA 3rd, Stefanidis D, PEGASUS Research Group (2013) The American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery National Skills Curriculum: adoption rate, challenges and strategies for effective implementation into surgical residency programs. Surgery 154(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.061
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.061
pubmed: 23809479
Orzech N, Palter VN, Reznick RK, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP (2012) A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 255(5):833–839. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824aca09
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824aca09
pubmed: 22504187