Prognostic Value of Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Young, Node-Negative, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Who Did Not Receive (neo)Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2022
20 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
31
3
2022
medline:
20
7
2022
entrez:
30
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered aggressive, and therefore, virtually all young patients with TNBC receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Increased stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have been associated with a favorable prognosis in TNBC. However, whether this association holds for patients who are node-negative (N0), young (< 40 years), and chemotherapy-naïve, and thus can be used for chemotherapy de-escalation strategies, is unknown. We selected all patients with N0 TNBC diagnosed between 1989 and 2000 from a Dutch population-based registry. Patients were age < 40 years at diagnosis and had not received (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, as was standard practice at the time. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were retrieved (PALGA: Dutch Pathology Registry), and a pathology review including sTILs was performed. Patients were categorized according to sTILs (< 30%, 30%-75%, and ≥ 75%). Multivariable Cox regression was performed for overall survival, with or without sTILs as a covariate. Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis or death was analyzed in a competing risk model, with second primary tumors as competing risk. sTILs were scored for 441 patients. High sTILs (≥ 75%; 21%) translated into an excellent prognosis with a 15-year cumulative incidence of a distant metastasis or death of only 2.1% (95% CI, 0 to 5.0), whereas low sTILs (< 30%; 52%) had an unfavorable prognosis with a 15-year cumulative incidence of a distant metastasis or death of 38.4% (32.1 to 44.6). In addition, every 10% increment of sTILs decreased the risk of death by 19% (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.87), which are an independent predictor adding prognostic information to standard clinicopathologic variables (χ Chemotherapy-naïve, young patients with N0 TNBC with high sTILs (≥ 75%) have an excellent long-term prognosis. Therefore, sTILs should be considered for prospective clinical trials investigating (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy de-escalation strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35353548
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01536
pmc: PMC9287283
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2361-2374Références
Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1440-1452
pubmed: 30739743
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2959-66
pubmed: 25071121
Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1544-50
pubmed: 24608200
Nature. 2016 May 02;534(7605):47-54
pubmed: 27135926
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;37(7):559-569
pubmed: 30650045
Mod Pathol. 2016 Oct;29(10):1155-64
pubmed: 27363491
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e017842
pubmed: 29138205
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2328-35
pubmed: 15197194
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jan;21(1):40-7
pubmed: 19622588
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):259-71
pubmed: 25214542
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May;23(5):588-95
pubmed: 25138101
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:240-250
pubmed: 31956037
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195536
pubmed: 31173129
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e4975
pubmed: 27749552
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):860-7
pubmed: 23341518
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):476-488
pubmed: 33721561
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 05;16(6):475
pubmed: 25475740
Cell Oncol. 2007;29(1):19-24
pubmed: 17429138
Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 Feb;9(1):29-33
pubmed: 19299237
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1460-8
pubmed: 26976419
Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2237-46
pubmed: 24891116
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 May 12;6:17
pubmed: 32411819
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Dec;65(12):e27397
pubmed: 30156052
Cancer. 2012 Aug 1;118(15):3670-80
pubmed: 22180017
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;167(1):89-99
pubmed: 28913760
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124169
pubmed: 25915539
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Apr 09;3(1):pkz008
pubmed: 31360893
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):983-91
pubmed: 25534375
Breast Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 10;23(1):20
pubmed: 33568222
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):560-569.e1
pubmed: 27650011
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;22(1):24-31
pubmed: 25012264
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(2):89-106
pubmed: 31836838
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5887-92
pubmed: 19858402
Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1941-1949
pubmed: 31566659
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb 15;177(4):292-8
pubmed: 23371353
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-180
pubmed: 29337092
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):29-40
pubmed: 18177773