Success rate of fractured teeth receiving modified crown lengthening surgery and restorations.
Odontoplasty
Root reshaping
Structurally compromised teeth
Success rate
Success time
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 03 2022
30 03 2022
Historique:
received:
26
08
2021
accepted:
23
03
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
2
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whether to preserve a structurally compromised tooth or remove it is a dilemma often encountered by clinicians. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term success rate of fractured teeth preserved by modified crown lengthening surgery and restorations. Thirty-nine patients with a total of 45 fractured teeth who had received modified crown lengthening surgery were recruited and examined. Numbers of teeth lost were recorded, and the criteria for successful teeth were defined. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the success rate. Possible risk factors were compared between successful and unsuccessful groups by a Cox regression analysis to explore the potential predictors of failure with a significant level at α = 0.05. The mean ± SD of success time without considering variants was 6.2 ± 0.6 years (95% CI 5.1-7.7). The mean survival rates ± SD at 1.0-, 2.0-, 3.0-, 5.0-, 7.0-, and 9.0-year intervals was 97.8 ± 2.2%, 92.2 ± 4.4%, 72.8 ± 7.9%, 68.2 ± 8.6%, 60.7 ± 10.5%, and 40.4 ± 13.6%, respectively. Failure cases in teeth with poor plaque control and step-shaped fracture margin were significantly more than those with good plaque control and knife-shaped fracture margin (HR = 7.237, p = 0.011; HR = 15.399, p = 0.006; respectively). Fractured teeth treated with modified crown lengthening surgery are anticipated to have a high clinical success rate for 6.2 ± 0.6 years. Plaque control and fracture morphology appeared to be significantly associated with the success of the multidisciplinary treatment approach.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Whether to preserve a structurally compromised tooth or remove it is a dilemma often encountered by clinicians. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term success rate of fractured teeth preserved by modified crown lengthening surgery and restorations.
METHODS
Thirty-nine patients with a total of 45 fractured teeth who had received modified crown lengthening surgery were recruited and examined. Numbers of teeth lost were recorded, and the criteria for successful teeth were defined. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the success rate. Possible risk factors were compared between successful and unsuccessful groups by a Cox regression analysis to explore the potential predictors of failure with a significant level at α = 0.05.
RESULTS
The mean ± SD of success time without considering variants was 6.2 ± 0.6 years (95% CI 5.1-7.7). The mean survival rates ± SD at 1.0-, 2.0-, 3.0-, 5.0-, 7.0-, and 9.0-year intervals was 97.8 ± 2.2%, 92.2 ± 4.4%, 72.8 ± 7.9%, 68.2 ± 8.6%, 60.7 ± 10.5%, and 40.4 ± 13.6%, respectively. Failure cases in teeth with poor plaque control and step-shaped fracture margin were significantly more than those with good plaque control and knife-shaped fracture margin (HR = 7.237, p = 0.011; HR = 15.399, p = 0.006; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Fractured teeth treated with modified crown lengthening surgery are anticipated to have a high clinical success rate for 6.2 ± 0.6 years. Plaque control and fracture morphology appeared to be significantly associated with the success of the multidisciplinary treatment approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35354462
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02143-z
pii: 10.1186/s12903-022-02143-z
pmc: PMC8969369
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
99Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Gen Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):e236-9
pubmed: 21062706
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Dec;19(6):529-41
pubmed: 10815592
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 05;8:126
pubmed: 21050499
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S14-6
pubmed: 23946567
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):355-63
pubmed: 11508092
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2654-2658
pubmed: 32984102
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):203-7
pubmed: 22800697
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:15-9
pubmed: 17594366
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Jun;141(6):647-55
pubmed: 20516094
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 9;52(3):182-187
pubmed: 28279057
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Mar;41(3):236-42
pubmed: 24483819
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jan;15(1):56-60
pubmed: 22368337
J Endod. 1989 Nov;15(11):512-6
pubmed: 2639947
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):751-757
pubmed: 31050812
Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):84-92
pubmed: 29493814
J Oral Implantol. 2012 Feb;38(1):95-100
pubmed: 21047216
J Endod. 2018 Sep;44(9):1416-1421
pubmed: 30049468
Br Dent J. 2017 Jan 13;222(1):21-25
pubmed: 28084388
J Prosthodont. 2012 Dec;21(8):626-30
pubmed: 22672712
J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Jan;19(1):58-63
pubmed: 1732311
Prim Dent J. 2020 Jan 29;8(4):48-53
pubmed: 32127094
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):103-8
pubmed: 27041850
J Dent. 2018 Apr;71:61-66
pubmed: 29499242
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1094-1108
pubmed: 27535216
Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 24;222(6):467-471
pubmed: 28337015
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 May-Jun;17(3):369-76
pubmed: 15237888
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2010 Jul;14(3):160-7
pubmed: 21760669
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):150-2
pubmed: 23758467
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Aug;15(4):280-4
pubmed: 19089145
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Jun;21(3):296-304
pubmed: 11490407
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jun;51(6):362-7
pubmed: 27256531
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:479241
pubmed: 22969804
Quintessence Int. 2017;48(9):753-764
pubmed: 28920112
Br Dent J. 2021 Feb;230(4):217-222
pubmed: 33637921