The effect of Patient's Own Medication use on patient's self-reported medication knowledge during hospitalisation: a pre-post intervention study.
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2022
30 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
22
01
2021
accepted:
04
03
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
2
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improving patient's medication knowledge and consequently medication use is essential for optimal treatment outcomes. As patient knowledge about medication is currently suboptimal, interventions to optimise medication knowledge are necessary. Implementation of Patient's Own Medication (POM) in which patients bring their outpatient medication to the hospital, and nurses administer these during admission, may increase medication knowledge. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of POM use on self-reported medication knowledge of hospitalised patients compared to standard care. Patient's sense of medication safety, attitude to the provision of information, and to inpatient medication use were studied in both standard care and during POM use too. In this nationwide intervention study perceived medication knowledge was assessed with a questionnaire pre and post implementing POM use. The questionnaire assessed perceived medication knowledge at admission and discharge, medication safety during hospitalisation, the provision of information during hospitalisation and at discharge, and inpatient medication use during hospitalisation. Patients' answers were categorised into positive and negative/neutral. The proportion of patients with adequate medication knowledge, in the standard care and POM use group at hospital admission and discharge, were calculated and compared with adjustment for potential confounders. Among the 731 patients (393 received standard care and 338 POM) who completed the questionnaire (80.2%), POM use seemed to be positively associated with self-reported knowledge on how to use medication at discharge (adjusted OR: 3.22 [95% CI 2.01-5.16]). However, for the other two knowledge related statements POM use was not associated. Medication knowledge at admission was the most important variable associated with perceived medication knowledge at discharge. The majority perceived POM use to be safer (52.9% of standard care patients versus 74.0% POM users; P < 0.01), POM users knew better which medicines they still used during hospitalisation (85.8% versus 92.3% resp.; P = 0.01), and most patients preferred POM use regardless of having experienced it (68.2% versus 82.2% resp.; P < 0.01). POM use positively affects patient's medication knowledge about how to use medication and patients' perception of medication safety. With POM use more patients have a positive attitude towards the provision of information. The majority of patients prefer POM use. In conclusion, POM use seems a valuable intervention and requires further investigation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Improving patient's medication knowledge and consequently medication use is essential for optimal treatment outcomes. As patient knowledge about medication is currently suboptimal, interventions to optimise medication knowledge are necessary. Implementation of Patient's Own Medication (POM) in which patients bring their outpatient medication to the hospital, and nurses administer these during admission, may increase medication knowledge. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of POM use on self-reported medication knowledge of hospitalised patients compared to standard care. Patient's sense of medication safety, attitude to the provision of information, and to inpatient medication use were studied in both standard care and during POM use too.
METHOD
METHODS
In this nationwide intervention study perceived medication knowledge was assessed with a questionnaire pre and post implementing POM use. The questionnaire assessed perceived medication knowledge at admission and discharge, medication safety during hospitalisation, the provision of information during hospitalisation and at discharge, and inpatient medication use during hospitalisation. Patients' answers were categorised into positive and negative/neutral. The proportion of patients with adequate medication knowledge, in the standard care and POM use group at hospital admission and discharge, were calculated and compared with adjustment for potential confounders.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 731 patients (393 received standard care and 338 POM) who completed the questionnaire (80.2%), POM use seemed to be positively associated with self-reported knowledge on how to use medication at discharge (adjusted OR: 3.22 [95% CI 2.01-5.16]). However, for the other two knowledge related statements POM use was not associated. Medication knowledge at admission was the most important variable associated with perceived medication knowledge at discharge. The majority perceived POM use to be safer (52.9% of standard care patients versus 74.0% POM users; P < 0.01), POM users knew better which medicines they still used during hospitalisation (85.8% versus 92.3% resp.; P = 0.01), and most patients preferred POM use regardless of having experienced it (68.2% versus 82.2% resp.; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
POM use positively affects patient's medication knowledge about how to use medication and patients' perception of medication safety. With POM use more patients have a positive attitude towards the provision of information. The majority of patients prefer POM use. In conclusion, POM use seems a valuable intervention and requires further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35354464
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07752-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-07752-6
pmc: PMC8969375
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
423Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nurs Sci Q. 2020 Jul;33(3):249-257
pubmed: 32605489
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Oct 1;75(19):1493-1517
pubmed: 30257844
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 05;10(6):e0129240
pubmed: 26046771
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Mar;4(1):37-45
pubmed: 18342821
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):209-14
pubmed: 22514147
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Oct;39(5):1084-1094
pubmed: 28756580
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 02;9(12):e113912
pubmed: 25463269
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1994 Dec;19(6):341-7
pubmed: 7876364
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Mar;56(3):276-82
pubmed: 15721969
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1890-6
pubmed: 18809816
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-40
pubmed: 21211484
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2000;32(4):361-7
pubmed: 11140200
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 May 4;11:2042098620904616
pubmed: 32435443
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Aug;33(8):792-5
pubmed: 949062
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):280-5
pubmed: 12897361
Diabetes Care. 2004 Dec;27(12):2800-5
pubmed: 15562188
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Dec;41(6):1658-1665
pubmed: 31705458
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):37-48
pubmed: 22554393
Drugs Aging. 2006;23(4):345-56
pubmed: 16732693
J Hosp Med. 2010 Feb;5(2):83-6
pubmed: 20013875
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;22(5):808-15
pubmed: 27198085
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97
pubmed: 16079372
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1513-20
pubmed: 22798200
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Dec;13(12):871-6
pubmed: 15455466