The Korean Hepatitis C Virus Care Cascade in a Tertiary Institution: Current Status and Changes in Testing, Link to Care, and Treatment.
Care cascade
Hepatitis C virus
Oral antiviral treatment
Journal
Gut and liver
ISSN: 2005-1212
Titre abrégé: Gut Liver
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101316452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2022
15 11 2022
Historique:
received:
06
09
2021
revised:
16
12
2021
accepted:
04
01
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
19
11
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The care cascade for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is impeded by multiple barriers, including suboptimal anti-HCV testing, link to care, and diagnosis. We explored the changes in the care cascade of HCV for the past 20 years and its current status in a large cohort from a tertiary referral center. We analyzed 1,144,468 patients who had anti-HCV testing between January 2001 and June 2020. Metrics related to the care cascade of HCV infection and the long-term prognosis of patients were explored. The seroprevalence of anti-HCV positivity was 1.8%, with a recent decreasing trend. In all, 69.9% of anti-HCV positive patients performed HCV RNA testing, with a 65.7% positivity. Patients who did not have HCV RNA testing were older and more likely to have a non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy, normal alanine aminotransferase level, and good liver function. Linkage times for HCV RNA testing from the anti-HCV positivity and for antiviral treatment from HCV diagnosis decreased, notably after 2015, when highly efficacious oral antiviral treatment was introduced to Korea. The average treatment uptake rate was 35.4%, which increased to 38.9% after 2015. Of the 5,302 patients analyzed for long-term prognosis, the annual incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma were 1.02 or 2.14 per 100 person-years in patients with or without a sustained virological response, respectively. The care cascade of HCV infection has been suboptimal for the past 20 years, despite the recent changes. More effort should be made to increase HCV RNA testing and treatment uptake.
Sections du résumé
Background/Aims
The care cascade for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is impeded by multiple barriers, including suboptimal anti-HCV testing, link to care, and diagnosis. We explored the changes in the care cascade of HCV for the past 20 years and its current status in a large cohort from a tertiary referral center.
Methods
We analyzed 1,144,468 patients who had anti-HCV testing between January 2001 and June 2020. Metrics related to the care cascade of HCV infection and the long-term prognosis of patients were explored.
Results
The seroprevalence of anti-HCV positivity was 1.8%, with a recent decreasing trend. In all, 69.9% of anti-HCV positive patients performed HCV RNA testing, with a 65.7% positivity. Patients who did not have HCV RNA testing were older and more likely to have a non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy, normal alanine aminotransferase level, and good liver function. Linkage times for HCV RNA testing from the anti-HCV positivity and for antiviral treatment from HCV diagnosis decreased, notably after 2015, when highly efficacious oral antiviral treatment was introduced to Korea. The average treatment uptake rate was 35.4%, which increased to 38.9% after 2015. Of the 5,302 patients analyzed for long-term prognosis, the annual incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma were 1.02 or 2.14 per 100 person-years in patients with or without a sustained virological response, respectively.
Conclusions
The care cascade of HCV infection has been suboptimal for the past 20 years, despite the recent changes. More effort should be made to increase HCV RNA testing and treatment uptake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35354688
pii: gnl210416
doi: 10.5009/gnl210416
pmc: PMC9668497
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
RNA
63231-63-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
964-975Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;2(3):161-176
pubmed: 28404132
Intern Med. 2017;56(15):1943-1948
pubmed: 28768961
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2963-9
pubmed: 23835712
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):686-721
pubmed: 31816111
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 30;67(10):1477-1492
pubmed: 30215672
J Hepatol. 2020 Nov;73(5):1170-1218
pubmed: 32956768
Hepatol Int. 2019 Sep;13(5):599-608
pubmed: 31432446
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 02;9(7):e101554
pubmed: 24988388
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:189-195
pubmed: 27596150
Gut Liver. 2020 Mar 15;14(2):207-217
pubmed: 31158950
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;27(1):136-143
pubmed: 33317253
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 27;4(11):e006255
pubmed: 25431223
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 22;7(9):e193
pubmed: 27657495
Hepatol Int. 2016 Sep;10(5):681-701
pubmed: 27229718
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2584-93
pubmed: 23268517
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):353-8
pubmed: 26562129
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;36(9):2479-2485
pubmed: 33788314
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 8;17(1):330
pubmed: 28482818