Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
16
07
2021
accepted:
23
02
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
19
4
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals. By contrast, whole-genome duplications-doublings of the entire complement of chromosomes-are linked to genetic instability and frequently found in human cancers
Identifiants
pubmed: 35355016
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04578-4
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-04578-4
pmc: PMC8986533
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
146-151Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Zack, T. I. et al. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration. Nat. Genet. 45, 1134–1140 (2013).
pubmed: 24071852
pmcid: 3966983
doi: 10.1038/ng.2760
Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).
pubmed: 30013179
pmcid: 6072608
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0165-1
López, S. et al. Interplay between whole-genome doubling and the accumulation of deleterious alterations in cancer evolution. Nat. Genet. 52, 283–293 (2020).
pubmed: 32139907
pmcid: 7116784
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0584-7
Storchova, Z. & Kuffer, C. The consequences of tetraploidy and aneuploidy. J. Cell Sci. 121, 3859–3866 (2008).
pubmed: 19020304
doi: 10.1242/jcs.039537
Storchova, Z. & Pellman, D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 45–54 (2004).
pubmed: 14708009
doi: 10.1038/nrm1276
Dewhurst, S. M. et al. Tolerance of whole- genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution. Cancer Discov. 4, 175–185 (2014).
pubmed: 24436049
pmcid: 4293454
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0285
Fox, D. T., Gall, J. G. & Spradling, A. C. Error-prone polyploid mitosis during normal Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 24, 2294–2302 (2010).
pubmed: 20952538
pmcid: 2956208
doi: 10.1101/gad.1952710
Goupil, A. et al. Chromosomes function as a barrier to mitotic spindle bipolarity in polyploid cells. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201908006 (2020).
pubmed: 32328633
pmcid: 7147111
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201908006
Fujiwara, T. et al. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 1043–1047 (2005).
pubmed: 16222300
doi: 10.1038/nature04217
Pedersen, R. S. et al. Profiling DNA damage response following mitotic perturbations. Nat. Commun. 7, 13887 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13887
Orr-Weaver, T. L. When bigger is better: the role of polyploidy in organogenesis. Trends Genet. 31, 307–315 (2015).
pubmed: 25921783
pmcid: 4537166
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.011
Gemble, S. & Basto, R. CHRONOCRISIS: when cell cycle asynchrony generates DNA damage in polyploid cells. BioEssays 42, e2000105 (2020).
pubmed: 32885500
doi: 10.1002/bies.202000105
Zeman, M. K. & Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 2–9 (2014).
pubmed: 24366029
pmcid: 4354890
doi: 10.1038/ncb2897
Koundrioukoff, S. et al. Stepwise activation of the ATR signaling pathway upon increasing replication stress impacts fragile site integrity. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003643 (2013).
pubmed: 23874235
pmcid: 3715430
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003643
Panier, S. & Boulton, S. J. Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 7–18 (2014).
pubmed: 24326623
doi: 10.1038/nrm3719
Ganem, N. J. et al. Cytokinesis failure triggers hippo tumor suppressor pathway activation. Cell 158, 833–848 (2014).
pubmed: 25126788
pmcid: 4136486
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.029
Zhao, B., Rothenberg, E., Ramsden, D. A. & Lieber, M. R. The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 765–781 (2020).
pubmed: 33077885
pmcid: 8063501
doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00297-8
Bester, A. C. et al. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435–446 (2011).
pubmed: 21529715
pmcid: 3740329
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.044
Burgess, A., Lorca, T. & Castro, A. Quantitative live imaging of endogenous DNA replication in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 7, e45726 (2012).
pubmed: 23029203
pmcid: 3447815
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045726
Michalet, X. et al. Dynamic molecular combing: stretching the whole human genome for high- resolution studies. Science 277, 1518–1523 (1997).
pubmed: 9278517
doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1518
Zhong, Y. et al. The level of origin firing inversely affects the rate of replication fork progression. J. Cell Biol. 201, 373–383 (2013).
pubmed: 23629964
pmcid: 3639389
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201208060
Tatsumi, Y., Ohta, S., Kimura, H., Tsurimoto, T. & Obuse, C. The ORC1 cycle in human cells: I. Cell cycle-regulated oscillation of human ORC1. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41528–41534 (2003).
pubmed: 12909627
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307534200
Remus, D. et al. Concerted loading of Mcm2–7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 139, 719–730 (2009).
pubmed: 19896182
pmcid: 2804858
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.015
Siddiqui, K., On, K. F. & Diffley, J. F. X. Regulating DNA replication in Eukarya. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012930 (2013).
pubmed: 23838438
pmcid: 3753713
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012930
Yan, Z. et al. Cdc6 is regulated by E2F and is essential for DNA replication in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3603–3608 (1998).
pubmed: 9520412
pmcid: 19882
doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3603
Moyer, S. E., Lewis, P. W. & Botchan, M. R. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2–7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10236–10241 (2006).
pubmed: 16798881
pmcid: 1482467
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602400103
Kumagai, A., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A. & Dunphy, W. G. Treslin collaborates with TopBP1 in triggering the initiation of DNA replication. Cell 140, 349–359 (2010).
pubmed: 20116089
pmcid: 2857569
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.049
DeGregori, J., Kowalik, T. & Nevins, J. R. Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 4215–4224 (1995).
pubmed: 7623816
pmcid: 230660
doi: 10.1128/MCB.15.8.4215
Pardee, A. B. G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation. Science 246, 603–608 (1989).
pubmed: 2683075
doi: 10.1126/science.2683075
Cross, F. R., Buchler, N. E. & Skotheim, J. M. Evolution of networks and sequences in eukaryotic cell cycle control. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 3532–3544 (2011).
pubmed: 22084380
pmcid: 3203458
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0078
Bertoli, C., Skotheim, J. M. & De Bruin, R. A. M. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 518–528 (2013).
pubmed: 23877564
pmcid: 4569015
doi: 10.1038/nrm3629
Cadart, C. et al. Size control in mammalian cells involves modulation of both growth rate and cell cycle duration. Nat. Commun. 9, 3275 (2018).
pubmed: 30115907
pmcid: 6095894
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05393-0
Nano, M. et al. Cell-cycle asynchrony generates DNA damage at mitotic entry in polyploid cells. Curr. Biol. 29, 3937–3945.e7 (2019).
pubmed: 31708395
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.041
Frawley, L. E. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Polyploidy. Curr. Biol. 25, R353–R358 (2015).
pubmed: 25942544
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.037
Carter, S. L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).
pubmed: 22544022
pmcid: 4383288
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2203
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689.e3 (2018).
pubmed: 29622463
pmcid: 6028190
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007
Hégarat, N. et al. Cyclin A triggers mitosis either via the greatwall kinase pathway or cyclin B. EMBO J. 39, e104419 (2020).
pubmed: 32350921
pmcid: 7265243
doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104419
SB, K. et al. A quantitative FastFUCCI assay defines cell cycle dynamics at a single-cell level. J. Cell Sci. 130, 512–520 (2017).
KS, Y., RH, K., M, L., R, G. & R, W. Single cell resolution in vivo imaging of DNA damage following PARP inhibition. Sci Rep. 5, 10129 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/srep10129
Karess, R. E. et al. The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. Cell 65, 1177–1189 (1991).
pubmed: 1905980
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90013-O
Gemble, S. et al. Centromere dysfunction compromises mitotic spindle pole integrity. Curr. Biol. 29, 3072–3080.e5 (2019).
pubmed: 31495582
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.052
J, L., BO, P., K, H., J, B. & K, H. Deregulated expression of E2F family members induces S-phase entry and overcomes p16INK4A-mediated growth suppression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1047–1057 (1996).
doi: 10.1128/MCB.16.3.1047
Sakaue-Sawano, A. et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132, 487–498 (2008).
pubmed: 18267078
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033
Aknoun, S. et al. Living cell dry mass measurement using quantitative phase imaging with quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry: an accuracy and sensitivity discussion. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 126009 (2015).
pubmed: 26720876
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.12.126009
Bon, P., Maucort, G., Wattellier, B. & Monneret, S. Quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry for quantitative phase microscopy of living cells. Opt. Express 17, 13080 (2009).
pubmed: 19654713
doi: 10.1364/OE.17.013080
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286
pmcid: 3322381
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Jun, G., Wing, M. K., Abecasis, G. R. & Kang, H. M. An efficient and scalable analysis framework for variant extraction and refinement from population-scale DNA sequence data. Genome Res. 25, 918–925 (2015).
pubmed: 25883319
pmcid: 4448687
doi: 10.1101/gr.176552.114
Bakker, B. et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies. Genome Biol. 17, 115 (2016).
pubmed: 27246460
pmcid: 4888588
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0971-7
van den Bos, H. et al. Single-cell whole genome sequencing reveals no evidence for common aneuploidy in normal and Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Genome Biol. 17, 116 (2016)
pubmed: 27246599
pmcid: 4888403
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0976-2
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Mootha, V. K. et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 34, 267–273 (2003).
pubmed: 12808457
doi: 10.1038/ng1180