Surgical Treatment for Choledocholithiasis Following Repeated Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.
Bile duct
Choledochoduodenostomy
Choledochotomy
Hepaticojejunostomy
T-tube
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
24
11
2021
accepted:
18
03
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first line treatment for choledocholithiasis. In many occasions, several attempts of ERCP are performed until failure is declared and surgical treatment is applied, in many times following procedure-related complications. We present the results of surgical management of patients with choledocholithiasis following repeated failures of ERCP due to impaction of multiple large stones. Patients that underwent surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis following repeated ERCP attempts between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Post-ERCP complications were evaluated and the surgical approach, technique, and outcomes were assessed. One hundred and two patients were operated on for choledocholithiasis following repeated failed ERCP. All the patients had at least 2 failed attempts (mean = 3.2 ± 1.7), and 25 (23.5%) suffered major ERCP-related complications. Following choledochotomy and stone extraction, bilioenteric anastomosis was done in the vast majority of patients (90.2%), most commonly choledochoduodenostomy (62%). Thirty-eight (37%) patients had minimally invasive procedure (laparoscopic n = 26, robotic assisted n = 12). Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 24 patients (23.5%). Nine patients (8.8%) were re-operated and 10 (9.8%) were readmitted within 30 days from surgery. Three patients died within 30 days from surgery. Older patients had significantly more ERCP attempts and suffered higher post-operative mortality. During a median follow-up of 70 months, the only biliary complication was an anastomotic stricture in one patient. Surgery for CBDS after failure of ERCP is safe and provides a highly effective long-term solution.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first line treatment for choledocholithiasis. In many occasions, several attempts of ERCP are performed until failure is declared and surgical treatment is applied, in many times following procedure-related complications. We present the results of surgical management of patients with choledocholithiasis following repeated failures of ERCP due to impaction of multiple large stones.
METHODS
Patients that underwent surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis following repeated ERCP attempts between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Post-ERCP complications were evaluated and the surgical approach, technique, and outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS
One hundred and two patients were operated on for choledocholithiasis following repeated failed ERCP. All the patients had at least 2 failed attempts (mean = 3.2 ± 1.7), and 25 (23.5%) suffered major ERCP-related complications. Following choledochotomy and stone extraction, bilioenteric anastomosis was done in the vast majority of patients (90.2%), most commonly choledochoduodenostomy (62%). Thirty-eight (37%) patients had minimally invasive procedure (laparoscopic n = 26, robotic assisted n = 12). Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 24 patients (23.5%). Nine patients (8.8%) were re-operated and 10 (9.8%) were readmitted within 30 days from surgery. Three patients died within 30 days from surgery. Older patients had significantly more ERCP attempts and suffered higher post-operative mortality. During a median follow-up of 70 months, the only biliary complication was an anastomotic stricture in one patient.
CONCLUSION
Surgery for CBDS after failure of ERCP is safe and provides a highly effective long-term solution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35355173
doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05309-w
pii: 10.1007/s11605-022-05309-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1233-1240Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Références
Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O'Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg. Jan 2004;239(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c .
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c
pubmed: 14685097
pmcid: 1356189
Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 2006;10(4):612-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.015
pubmed: 16627230
Schacher FC, Giongo SM, Teixeira FJP, Mattos AZ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus surgery for choledocholithiasis - A meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. Jul - Aug 2019;18(4):595-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.010
pubmed: 31080054
Ruiz Cuesta P, Hervas Molina AJ, Munoz Garcia-Borruel M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the stomach due to surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol. Dec 2013;36(10):609-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.08.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.08.001
pubmed: 24099857
Senthilnathan P, Sharma D, Sabnis SC, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. Apr 2018;32(4):1828-1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5868-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5868-3
pubmed: 29046958
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. Feb 2020;52(2):127-149. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1075-4080 .
doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080
pubmed: 31863440
Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events: post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. Jan 2015;25(1):107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.006
pubmed: 25442962
Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). Aug 2013;9(8):496-504.
Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: general overview. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. Jan 2015;25(1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.005
pubmed: 25442961
Weiser R, Pencovich N, Mlynarsky L, et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Experience of a tertiary center. Surgery. Apr 2017;161(4):920-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.10.029 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.10.029
pubmed: 28027817
Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: Management and prevention. World J Clin Cases. Oct 16 2014;2(10):522-527. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.522 .
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.522
pubmed: 25325062
pmcid: 4198404
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Li T, Cheng B, Jin X. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. Oct 2019;33(10):3275-3286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w
pubmed: 30511313
Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 19 2006(2):CD003327. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2
Gupta N. Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis. World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27 2016;8(5):376-381. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.376 .
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.376
pubmed: 27231516
pmcid: 4872066
Zhang J, Ling X. Risk factors and management of primary choledocholithiasis: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. Aug 19 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16211 .