The Role of Motor Inhibition During Covert Speech Production.
covert speech
inner speech
motor control
motor imagery
motor inhibition
motor simulation
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
10
2021
accepted:
31
01
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Covert speech is accompanied by a subjective multisensory experience with auditory and kinaesthetic components. An influential hypothesis states that these sensory percepts result from a simulation of the corresponding motor action that relies on the same internal models recruited for the control of overt speech. This simulationist view raises the question of how it is possible to imagine speech without executing it. In this perspective, we discuss the possible role(s) played by motor inhibition during covert speech production. We suggest that considering covert speech as an inhibited form of overt speech maps naturally to the purported progressive internalization of overt speech during childhood. We further argue that the role of motor inhibition may differ widely across different forms of covert speech (e.g., condensed vs. expanded covert speech) and that considering this variety helps reconciling seemingly contradictory findings from the neuroimaging literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35355587
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.804832
pmc: PMC8959424
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
804832Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Nalborczyk, Debarnot, Longcamp, Guillot and Alario.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Psychol Bull. 2015 Sep;141(5):931-65
pubmed: 26011789
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):491-501
pubmed: 10511638
Cogn Psychol. 1989 Apr;21(2):233-82
pubmed: 2706928
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Mar 15;261:220-39
pubmed: 24412278
Acta Otolaryngol. 1958 Nov-Dec;49(6):478-82
pubmed: 13605726
Psychol Res. 2022 Dec 14;:
pubmed: 36515699
Neuroscience. 2020 May 10;434:102-110
pubmed: 32229235
Mem Cognit. 1985 Jul;13(4):289-303
pubmed: 4079746
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):77-94
pubmed: 32713328
Brain Lang. 2005 Mar;92(3):240-50
pubmed: 15721957
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 18;10:2019
pubmed: 31620039
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152188
pubmed: 27010832
Brain Cogn. 2002 Oct;50(1):1-16
pubmed: 12372347
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar;25(3):240-251
pubmed: 33454217
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1418-1438
pubmed: 32367223
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:1-12
pubmed: 26889603
C R Biol. 2006 May-Jun;329(5-6):354-62
pubmed: 16731493
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):655-665
pubmed: 26440120
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;6:314
pubmed: 23226121
eNeuro. 2019 Sep 19;6(5):
pubmed: 31481396
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e55-68
pubmed: 20932513
PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0126800
pubmed: 26000451
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul;25(7):1020-36
pubmed: 23469885
Neuroscientist. 2007 Jun;13(3):214-28
pubmed: 17519365
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S103-9
pubmed: 11373140
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:54-62
pubmed: 29698848
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):459-466
pubmed: 27363713
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Apr;238(4):931-944
pubmed: 32179942
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Dec;47(12):1621-1646
pubmed: 34726453
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):828-837
pubmed: 18234512
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:255-62
pubmed: 25218168
J Neurosci. 2012 Dec 5;32(49):17554-62
pubmed: 23223279
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Sep 05;6:247
pubmed: 22973214