The Importance of Scar Cosmesis across the Surgical Specialties: Factors, Perceptions, and Predispositions.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
22
12
2021
accepted:
02
02
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Existing disparities in the perception of scars between patients and practitioners can translate into undesirable physical and psychological outcomes. An understanding of the determinants of surgeons' perceptions on the importance of scar cosmesis is a first step toward bridging this gap. In an online survey, surgeons were asked about the extent to which various patient and technical factors affect the importance of scar cosmesis. Additional data were obtained on surgeon characteristics, including their specialty, gender, years of experience, and work sector to investigate potential relationships. A total of 303 responses were obtained from surgeons across six specialties. Based on the survey, the importance of scar cosmesis was rated highest among plastic surgeons and obstetricians and gynecologists, and lowest among orthopedic and vascular surgeons. Compared with surgeons in private practice, publicly employed surgeons' rating of the importance of cosmesis was lower. The patient's request for a cosmetic outcome was the most highly rated factor. Regarding the influence of patient demographics on surgeons' attitudes, scar cosmesis in young and female patients was favored in comparison with older and male patients. Factors that reduced the importance of cosmesis were emergency and late-night surgeries followed by lengthy procedures, large incisions, and busy operative lists. These initial findings highlight a need to investigate means of fostering a more holistic, impartial approach toward scar cosmesis, as well as addressing potential workplace barriers that may prevent surgeons from seeking a more cosmetic result. Greater alignment between the priorities of surgeons and patients may manifest in objective and subjective improvements in patient's scars and well-being.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35356039
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004219
pmc: PMC8939916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e4219Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 May 24;:
pubmed: 34028560
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19
pubmed: 28249596
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 11;100(23):e26187
pubmed: 34115002
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Jan;66(1):16-20
pubmed: 22171901
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):256-265
pubmed: 19568089
Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):160-164
pubmed: 31520624
Transplantation. 2021 May 1;105(5):1039-1043
pubmed: 32467480
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1229-37
pubmed: 15083026