Crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America: current knowledge and potential future management directions.
Agri-environment schemes
Animal damage
Bird damage
Crop feeding
Crop protection
Human-wildlife conflict
Mammal damage
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
10
2021
accepted:
08
03
2022
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Crop farming contributes to one of the most extensive land use activities in the world, and cropland areas continue to rise. Many vertebrate species feed on crops, which has caused an increase in human-wildlife conflicts in croplands. Crop-feeding damages the economy of local communities and causes retaliation against the responsible vertebrates in several forms, including lethal practices such as hunting and poisoning. Lethal control may cause the local extirpation of some species, affecting ecological processes and patterns. Therefore, it is necessary to find non-lethal alternatives that can protect both local economies and wildlife. Research has been conducted in Africa and Asia, focusing on elephants and primates, and the effectiveness of some non-lethal alternatives, such as chili-based repellents and beehives, is being investigated. However, there has been very little research on this topic in Central and South America. The goal of this review is to assess the current knowledge on crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America and indicate future research directions. We reviewed the available scientific literature reporting crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America, and the Caribbean, published between 1980 and 2020, through systematic searches on Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We analyzed the temporal and geographical distributions of the studies, the crops and vertebrate species these studies considered, the crop protection techniques used, and their effectiveness. We retrieved only 113 studies on crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America, but there was an increasing trend in the number of studies published over time. Most of the studies were conducted in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica. Four orders of mammals (Rodentia, Carnivora, Artiodactyla, and Primates) and four orders of birds (Passeriformes, Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, and Anseriformes) were the most common groups of crop-feeding vertebrates. The most prominent crop was corn, which was featured in 49% of the studies. Other notable crops include rice, sorghum, and sugarcane. The most reported method for protecting crops was lethal control through hunting or poisoning. Non-lethal techniques were found to be less prevalent. Less than half of the studies that mentioned the use of protection techniques indicated their effectiveness, and only 10 studies evaluated it by performing scientific experiments and reporting their results. Central and South America is still underrepresented in research on vertebrate crop-feeding. There is a need for experimentation-based robust research to find crop protection techniques that minimize harm to vertebrates while effectively reducing damage to crops. While this is being studied, habitat loss and fragmentation need to be halted to prevent the native vertebrates from turning to crops for food.
Sections du résumé
Background
Crop farming contributes to one of the most extensive land use activities in the world, and cropland areas continue to rise. Many vertebrate species feed on crops, which has caused an increase in human-wildlife conflicts in croplands. Crop-feeding damages the economy of local communities and causes retaliation against the responsible vertebrates in several forms, including lethal practices such as hunting and poisoning. Lethal control may cause the local extirpation of some species, affecting ecological processes and patterns. Therefore, it is necessary to find non-lethal alternatives that can protect both local economies and wildlife. Research has been conducted in Africa and Asia, focusing on elephants and primates, and the effectiveness of some non-lethal alternatives, such as chili-based repellents and beehives, is being investigated. However, there has been very little research on this topic in Central and South America. The goal of this review is to assess the current knowledge on crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America and indicate future research directions.
Survey methodology
We reviewed the available scientific literature reporting crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America, and the Caribbean, published between 1980 and 2020, through systematic searches on Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We analyzed the temporal and geographical distributions of the studies, the crops and vertebrate species these studies considered, the crop protection techniques used, and their effectiveness.
Results
We retrieved only 113 studies on crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America, but there was an increasing trend in the number of studies published over time. Most of the studies were conducted in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica. Four orders of mammals (Rodentia, Carnivora, Artiodactyla, and Primates) and four orders of birds (Passeriformes, Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, and Anseriformes) were the most common groups of crop-feeding vertebrates. The most prominent crop was corn, which was featured in 49% of the studies. Other notable crops include rice, sorghum, and sugarcane. The most reported method for protecting crops was lethal control through hunting or poisoning. Non-lethal techniques were found to be less prevalent. Less than half of the studies that mentioned the use of protection techniques indicated their effectiveness, and only 10 studies evaluated it by performing scientific experiments and reporting their results.
Conclusions
Central and South America is still underrepresented in research on vertebrate crop-feeding. There is a need for experimentation-based robust research to find crop protection techniques that minimize harm to vertebrates while effectively reducing damage to crops. While this is being studied, habitat loss and fragmentation need to be halted to prevent the native vertebrates from turning to crops for food.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35356474
doi: 10.7717/peerj.13185
pii: 13185
pmc: PMC8958972
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13185Informations de copyright
© 2022 Alejandro Cuesta Hermira and Michalski.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Fernanda Michalski is a research associate from Pro-Carnivores Institute. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Rev Biol Trop. 2014 Dec;62(4):1495-507
pubmed: 25720183
Braz J Biol. 2014 Nov;74(4):779-86
pubmed: 25627586
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):233-240
pubmed: 28857505
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Oct;72(10):1813-25
pubmed: 27252044
PLoS One. 2016 May 31;11(5):e0156307
pubmed: 27243222
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):12
pubmed: 34990229
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar;3(3):430-439
pubmed: 30718852
PeerJ. 2020 Nov 23;8:e10428
pubmed: 33282566
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0173742
pubmed: 28510590
Am J Primatol. 2010 Sep;72(10):866-76
pubmed: 20301138
Am J Primatol. 2012 Jan 1;74(1):29-36
pubmed: 22025206
Agric Syst. 2017 May;153:190-200
pubmed: 28579671
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):e592-e602
pubmed: 29055170
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):743-752
pubmed: 28221699
Primates. 2019 Jan;60(1):81-91
pubmed: 30465237
BMC Ecol. 2018 Feb 06;18(1):4
pubmed: 29409472
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):319-327
pubmed: 28215017
PeerJ. 2017 Jun 7;5:e3442
pubmed: 28607839
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155690
pubmed: 27196059
Nat Commun. 2019 May 15;10(1):2166
pubmed: 31092816
PeerJ. 2020 Jun 8;8:e9049
pubmed: 32551190
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13256
pubmed: 34168214
Science. 2018 Aug 31;361(6405):916-919
pubmed: 30166490
Nature. 2016 Jan 7;529(7584):84-7
pubmed: 26738594
Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1122-1133
pubmed: 31542887
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7074-7
pubmed: 10860973
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46636
pubmed: 23056378
PeerJ. 2018 Nov 8;6:e5850
pubmed: 30425887
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2019;90(6):456-469
pubmed: 31238315
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2018;89(1):63-80
pubmed: 29631262
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
pubmed: 10706275
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138237
pubmed: 26379270
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):221-34
pubmed: 26052848
Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1228-31
pubmed: 11072941
Rev Cubana Med Trop. 1999 Sep-Dec;51(3):185-8
pubmed: 10887586