Healthy and unhealthy eating after a behaviour change intervention in primary care.
behaviour change
healthy diet
non-communicable diseases
physical activity
primary health care
self-rated health
Journal
Primary health care research & development
ISSN: 1477-1128
Titre abrégé: Prim Health Care Res Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 03 2022
31 03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
31
3
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To prevent and reduce non-communicable diseases, the Norwegian Directorate of Health encourages Healthy Life Centres (HLCs) in all municipalities. This study investigates whether the behaviour change interventions at HLCs positively affected participants' diet and to evaluate predictors for healthy and unhealthy eating. Our data are part of the Norwegian Healthy Life Centre Study, a 6-month, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Totally, 118 participants ≥18 years old were randomised to an intervention group (n 57), or a waiting list (control group) (n 61). Eighty-six participants met at the 6 months follow-up visit. We merged the participants to one cohort for predictor analyses, using linear regressions. The RCT of the HLCs' interventions had no effect on healthy and unhealthy eating 6 months after baseline compared with controls. A short, additional healthy eating education programme produced a modest, statistically significant improvement in healthy eating compared with controls. This did not, however, reduce unhealthy eating. Higher income predicted unhealthier eating over time. Increasing body mass index and impaired physical functioning also led to an increase in unhealthy eating. Healthy eating at 6 months was predicted by self-rated health (SRH), vitality and life satisfaction, and hampered by musculo-skeletal challenges and impaired self-esteem (SE). SRH impacted improvement in healthy eating during the 6 months. The effect of interventions on healthier eating may be improved by an emphasis on developing positive self-concepts like better SRH, vitality, life satisfaction, and SE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To prevent and reduce non-communicable diseases, the Norwegian Directorate of Health encourages Healthy Life Centres (HLCs) in all municipalities.
AIMS
This study investigates whether the behaviour change interventions at HLCs positively affected participants' diet and to evaluate predictors for healthy and unhealthy eating. Our data are part of the Norwegian Healthy Life Centre Study, a 6-month, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT).
METHODS
Totally, 118 participants ≥18 years old were randomised to an intervention group (n 57), or a waiting list (control group) (n 61). Eighty-six participants met at the 6 months follow-up visit. We merged the participants to one cohort for predictor analyses, using linear regressions.
FINDINGS
The RCT of the HLCs' interventions had no effect on healthy and unhealthy eating 6 months after baseline compared with controls. A short, additional healthy eating education programme produced a modest, statistically significant improvement in healthy eating compared with controls. This did not, however, reduce unhealthy eating. Higher income predicted unhealthier eating over time. Increasing body mass index and impaired physical functioning also led to an increase in unhealthy eating. Healthy eating at 6 months was predicted by self-rated health (SRH), vitality and life satisfaction, and hampered by musculo-skeletal challenges and impaired self-esteem (SE). SRH impacted improvement in healthy eating during the 6 months. The effect of interventions on healthier eating may be improved by an emphasis on developing positive self-concepts like better SRH, vitality, life satisfaction, and SE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35357281
pii: S1463423622000147
doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000147
pmc: PMC8991859
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e23Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD008722
pubmed: 23450587
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Nov;46(7):774-781
pubmed: 29516790
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):393-401
pubmed: 32791888
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Dec;24(12):1715-25
pubmed: 11126230
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):27
pubmed: 23243114
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(60):1-110
pubmed: 26222987
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254
pubmed: 22182828
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 16;13:232
pubmed: 23496915
J Health Psychol. 2017 Jun;22(7):906-915
pubmed: 26679713
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43134
pubmed: 22905215
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):737-44
pubmed: 22493474
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):709-16
pubmed: 19916639
PeerJ. 2014 Sep 16;2:e565
pubmed: 25276501
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Dec 05;10:133
pubmed: 24308572
Prev Med. 2011 May;52(5):317-25
pubmed: 21300083
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Feb;47(1):18-27
pubmed: 30074437
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):18
pubmed: 28056906
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Apr 30;4:15
pubmed: 17466077
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(6):591-8
pubmed: 17852978
Obes Res. 2001 Feb;9(2):102-11
pubmed: 11316344
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:1-9
pubmed: 25016460
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):31-9
pubmed: 17997263
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648
pubmed: 25468152
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Feb;74(2):323-5
pubmed: 25261576
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Mar 02;9:21
pubmed: 22385782
Nutr Res. 2010 Aug;30(8):541-9
pubmed: 20851308
Health Educ Res. 2007 Oct;22(5):691-702
pubmed: 17138613
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2076-2094
pubmed: 33231669
J Behav Med. 2008 Oct;31(5):367-77
pubmed: 18587639
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 28;14(1):42
pubmed: 28351367
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):391-401
pubmed: 21822750
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1823
pubmed: 24609919
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Sep;10(7):1024-31
pubmed: 23132819