Key Indicators Affecting Hospital Efficiency: A Systematic Review.

hospital inputs hospital outputs hospital process indicators technical efficiency

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 06 12 2021
accepted: 17 01 2022
entrez: 1 4 2022
pubmed: 2 4 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Measuring hospital efficiency is a systematic process to optimizing performance and resource allocation. The current review study has investigated the key input, process, and output indicators that are commonly used in measuring the technical efficiency of the hospital to promote the accuracy of the results. To conduct this systematic review, the electronic resources and databases MEDLINE ( After the final analysis, the Context/Input indicators that were commonly considered by studies in analyzing hospital technical efficiency include different variables related to Hospital Capacity, Structure, Characteristics, Market concentration, and Costs. The Process/Throughput indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity or services-oriented process Indicators, Hospital Quality-oriented process indicators, and Hospital Educational processes. Finally, the Output/Outcome indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity-related output variables and Quality-related output/outcomes variables. This study has identified that it is necessary to mix and assess a set of input, process, and output indicators of the hospital with both quantitative and qualitative indicators for measuring the technical efficiency of hospitals comprehensively.

Sections du résumé

Background
Measuring hospital efficiency is a systematic process to optimizing performance and resource allocation. The current review study has investigated the key input, process, and output indicators that are commonly used in measuring the technical efficiency of the hospital to promote the accuracy of the results.
Methods
To conduct this systematic review, the electronic resources and databases MEDLINE (
Results
After the final analysis, the Context/Input indicators that were commonly considered by studies in analyzing hospital technical efficiency include different variables related to Hospital Capacity, Structure, Characteristics, Market concentration, and Costs. The Process/Throughput indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity or services-oriented process Indicators, Hospital Quality-oriented process indicators, and Hospital Educational processes. Finally, the Output/Outcome indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity-related output variables and Quality-related output/outcomes variables.
Conclusion
This study has identified that it is necessary to mix and assess a set of input, process, and output indicators of the hospital with both quantitative and qualitative indicators for measuring the technical efficiency of hospitals comprehensively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35359774
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.830102
pmc: PMC8964142
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

830102

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Imani, Alibabayee, Golestani and Dalal.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 Nov;6(4):271-83
pubmed: 14686633
J Health Care Finance. 2002 Winter;29(2):53-63
pubmed: 12462659
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Jun;4(2):83-90
pubmed: 11393745
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Jun;4(2):91-101
pubmed: 11393746
Biosci Trends. 2010 Oct;4(5):218-24
pubmed: 21068473
J Med Syst. 2000 Dec;24(6):307-20
pubmed: 11143589
J Med Syst. 2011 Aug;35(4):625-37
pubmed: 20703526
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 2):1869-87
pubmed: 18662170
Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):335-50
pubmed: 17619236
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):156
pubmed: 25486892
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30 Suppl 2:S143-8
pubmed: 26617448
J Med Syst. 2002 Feb;26(1):39-45
pubmed: 11777310
Health Serv Res. 1996 Apr;31(1):21-37
pubmed: 8617607
Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 Nov;6(4):203-18
pubmed: 14686627
Health Serv Manage Res. 2009 May;22(2):81-91
pubmed: 19401501
J Med Syst. 2004 Oct;28(5):411-22
pubmed: 15527029

Auteurs

Ali Imani (A)

Tabriz Health Service Management Research Center, Health Economics Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Roghayeh Alibabayee (R)

Tabriz Health Service Management Research Center, Health Economics Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Mina Golestani (M)

Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Koustuv Dalal (K)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH