Point-of-care ultrasound training for respiratory therapists: A scoping review.
medical education
point-of-care ultrasound
respiratory therapy
ultrasonography
ultrasound curriculum
Journal
Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR
ISSN: 1205-9838
Titre abrégé: Can J Respir Ther
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9617402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
1
4
2022
pubmed:
2
4
2022
medline:
2
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), although commonly used in clinical practice, is not currently included in training programs for respiratory therapists (RTs). In fact, given its ubiquity and clinical utility, RTs in Ontario, Canada, are changing their mandate to incorporate POCUS into their daily patient assessment. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of the literature, aiming to describe the current evidence of POCUS training and methods of curriculum delivery for RTs to inform an evidence-based program design. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 8 July 2020. We included all studies reporting on RT training in POCUS. Documents included English language, full-text reports of all study designs. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data abstraction were done independently and in duplicate. Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, including four full texts and three abstracts; all were prospective and single-center studies, except one multicenter study. Reports were from nine different countries. Studies described cardiac, lung, and procedural ultrasonography use. The majority used a combination of educational methods; didactic talks, hands-on sessions, and practical assessments being the most common methods. There was a median of 11 participants enrolled in a training session. The instructors were physicians from various specialties such as critical care, pulmonology, and radiology. This scoping review identified seven papers that explored different methods of a POCUS curriculum delivery for RTs. From the interventions outlined, teaching POCUS skills to RTs seems feasible. However, further work needs to be done to solidify a POCUS curriculum specific to RTs and examine the impact on patient-related outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35359818
doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2021-065
pii: 065
pmc: PMC8906431
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
28-33Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Air Med J. 2019 Sep - Oct;38(5):338-342
pubmed: 31578971
Respir Care. 2014 Dec;59(12):1813-6
pubmed: 25233385
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Mar 21;24(5):20
pubmed: 32200432
Physiother Res Int. 2015 Jun;20(2):69-76
pubmed: 25545613
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4
pubmed: 25034198
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):e27-e54
pubmed: 28442101
Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):e38-e51
pubmed: 30889249
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):899-907
pubmed: 31917702
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):e1561-e1570
pubmed: 29446172
AANA J. 2016 Dec;84(6):390
pubmed: 28235169
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):63-71
pubmed: 26474994
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan 2;14:E1-E6
pubmed: 30604779