Concrete Experiences and Support Needs Regarding the Euthanasia Practice in Adults With Psychiatric Conditions: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals and Volunteers in Belgium.

adult psychiatry assisted suicide end-of-life decisions euthanasia mental disorder

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 21 01 2022
accepted: 14 02 2022
entrez: 1 4 2022
pubmed: 2 4 2022
medline: 2 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although euthanasia in the context of adult psychiatry is legalized in Belgium, it poses major ethical and clinical challenges for the health care professionals and volunteers involved. This study aimed to address these members' concrete experiences and support needs. A qualitative semi-structured interview study was conducted with 16 physicians and 14 other health care professionals and volunteers, with at least one concrete experience with euthanasia requests and procedures concerning adults with psychiatric conditions. Concrete experiences concerned the following 8 domains: (1) the impact of euthanasia on the clinical trajectory and (2) on the therapeutic relationship, (3) internal and (4) external collaborative partnerships, (5) patients' social inner circle (non-)involvement, (6) the use of recently published guidelines and, (7) the first criminal trials on this topic, and (8) the act of euthanasia. The following 8 main support needs emerged; (1) protocols addressing specific sub-populations and pathologies, (2) protocols specifically drawn up for non-medics, (3) guidance on how to adequately implement the two-track approach, (4) (after)care for patients, (5) (after)care for the health care team, (6) guidance on the patient's social inner circle involvement, (7) enhanced education measures, and (8) enhanced financial measures, including incentives for holistic, palliative care approaches. The health care professionals and volunteers reported many positive and negative experiences in dealing with euthanasia requests in adult psychiatry. They reported several support needs across the extensive euthanasia trajectory, pertaining to concrete management of thorny issues that guidelines do not (yet) touch on. Important implications of our study relate to tackling these existing issues, and to paying sufficient attention to the impact of a euthanasia trajectory on all actors, including the patients and their social inner circle, involved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35360142
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859745
pmc: PMC8963330
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

859745

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Verhofstadt, Audenaert, Mortier, Deliens, Liégeois, Pardon and Chambaere.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

MV has received research grants from the Research Foundation Flanders. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Br J Nurs. 2011 May 13-26;20(9):559-63
pubmed: 21647017
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):374
pubmed: 32678038
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Sep;75(5):845-53
pubmed: 22682367
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;28(5):804-814
pubmed: 33960590
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jul;15(4):375-378
pubmed: 28694277
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0144749
pubmed: 26700007
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:158-167
pubmed: 34638052
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 May;188:405-9
pubmed: 16648525
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):647-656
pubmed: 33556494
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 16;:
pubmed: 34914019
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 5;80(6):
pubmed: 31721484
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Jun;39(2):166-173
pubmed: 34241574
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May - Jun;64:150-161
pubmed: 31122625
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1241-1256
pubmed: 32482180
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211029775
pubmed: 34263672
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):3540-3553
pubmed: 32921084

Auteurs

Monica Verhofstadt (M)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

Kurt Audenaert (K)

Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Freddy Mortier (F)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Luc Deliens (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

Axel Liégeois (A)

Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium.

Koen Pardon (K)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

Kenneth Chambaere (K)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH