Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the adult population during the pre-vaccination period, Norway, winter 2020/21.
Covid-19
Norway
SARS-CoV-2
Seroprevalence
contact tracing
cumulative incidence
Journal
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
ISSN: 1560-7917
Titre abrégé: Euro Surveill
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100887452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
1
4
2022
pubmed:
2
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
BackgroundSince March 2020, 440 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with COVID-19, but the true number of infections with SARS-CoV-2 is higher. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence can add crucial epidemiological information about population infection dynamics.AimTo provide a large population-based SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence survey from Norway; we estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence before introduction of vaccines and described its distribution across demographic groups.MethodsIn this population-based cross-sectional study, a total of 110,000 people aged 16 years or older were randomly selected during November-December 2020 and invited to complete a questionnaire and provide a dried blood spot (DBS) sample.ResultsThe response rate was 30% (31,458/104,637); compliance rate for return of DBS samples was 88% (27,700/31,458). National weighted and adjusted seroprevalence was 0.9% (95% CI (confidence interval): 0.7-1.0). Seroprevalence was highest among those aged 16-19 years (1.9%; 95% CI: 0.9-2.9), those born outside the Nordic countries 1.4% (95% CI: 1.0-1.9), and in the counties of Oslo 1.7% (95% CI: 1.2-2.2) and Vestland 1.4% (95% CI: 0.9-1.8). The ratio of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence (0.9%) to cumulative incidence of virologically detected cases by mid-December 2020 (0.8%) was slightly above one. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was low before introduction of vaccines in Norway and was comparable to virologically detected cases, indicating that most cases in the first 10 months of the pandemic were detected.ConclusionFindings suggest that preventive measures including contact tracing have been effective, people complied with physical distancing recommendations, and local efforts to contain outbreaks have been essential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35362405
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.13.2100376
pmc: PMC8973017
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Nat Microbiol. 2019 May;4(5):734-747
pubmed: 30886356
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;101(1):115425
pubmed: 34116343
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):514-515
pubmed: 32645348
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 10;12(1):905
pubmed: 33568663
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e598-e609
pubmed: 33705690
Fam Pract. 2008 Oct;25(5):390-6
pubmed: 18765409
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):163-164
pubmed: 33341124
Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1204-1212
pubmed: 33743221
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;101:314-322
pubmed: 33045429
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Jan;90:107271
pubmed: 33310664
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 06;6(1):e009912
pubmed: 26739738
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;21(1):2103
pubmed: 34789188
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):655-662
pubmed: 33481642
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7S):S74-S81
pubmed: 32389405
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 6;12(1):4144
pubmed: 34230476
Bioanalysis. 2021 Jan;13(1):13-28
pubmed: 33319585
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):276
pubmed: 28330465