Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry.
Absolute predictive error
Intraocular lens power
Optical biometry
Pediatric cataract
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
20
11
2021
accepted:
12
03
2022
pubmed:
2
4
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
entrez:
1
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q and Barrett II Universal, Haigis) in pediatric cataract surgery using optical biometry. This prospective study included seventy eyes of 70 patients between ages of 3-15 who had undergone cataract surgery with IOL implantation. Anterior segment parameters and axial length (AL) were measured with an optical biometer. Barrett II Universal formula results were used to determine the diopter of implanted IOL. Postoperative refraction was taken at first month, and differences from the estimated refractive value [mean absolute predictive error (APE)] were compared between formulas. Formulas were also compared according to AL. The lowest APE was achieved with Barrett II formula (0.64 ± 0.73D) and the highest with Haigis formula (1.06 ± 0.84D) in the whole study population (p < 0.01). APE values were lowest with Holladay 1 (0.79 ± 0.71D) and highest with Haigis (1.44 ± 0.92D) in patients with an AL ≤ 22 mm; lowest APE was achieved with Barrett II (0.47 ± 0.54D) and highest with Haigis (0.84 ± 0.72D) in patients with an AL > 22 mm. Barrett II formula had the best results in eyes with average AL, and SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas were better in eyes with shorter AL. Haigis formula statistically had the highest predictive error in all formulas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35362808
doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02293-7
pii: 10.1007/s10792-022-02293-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3071-3077Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Vasavada Abhay R, Nihalani BR (2006) Pediatric cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icu.0000193069.32369.e1
doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193069.32369.e1
pubmed: 16436925
Lloyd IC, Ashworth J, Biswas S, Abadi RV (2007) Advances in the management of congenital and infantile cataract. In Eye 21:1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702845
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702845
Nihalani BR, VanderVeen DK (2010) Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in pediatric eyes. Ophthalmology 117(8):1493–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.031
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.031
pubmed: 20466430
Maya E-T, Archer SM, Del Monte MA (2007) Intraocular lens power calculation in children. Surv Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.06.010
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.06.010
Huseyin G, Sahin A, Basmak H, Ozer A, Yldrm N, Colak E (2011) Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population. Optom Vis Sci 88(8):912–919. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6
Mittelviefhaus H, Gentner C (2000) Errors in keratometry for intraocular lens implantation in children. Ophthalmologe 97(3):186–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003470050511
doi: 10.1007/s003470050511
pubmed: 10789175
Maya E-T, Tsimhoni O, Archer SM, Del Monte MA (2008) Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients. J AAPOS 12(2):173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.10.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.10.012
Trivedi RH, Edward Wilson M (2008) Keratometry in pediatric eyes with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 126(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.22
doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.22
pubmed: 18195216
Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C (2016) Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas. In J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021
Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125(2):288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027
Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG (2008) Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.7.929
doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.7.929
pubmed: 18695109
Robert M-M, Carones F, Buttacchio A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D (2011) Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. J Refract Surg 27(9):665–671. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110202-01
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110202-01
Narváez Julio D, Hunter Cherwek R, Stulting D, Waldron R, Zimmerman GJ, Wessels IF, Waring GO (2008) Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Off J Int Soc Imaging Eye 39(1):30–34. https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20080101-08
doi: 10.3928/15428877-20080101-08
Li Y, Li HX, Liu YC, Guo YT, Gao JM, Wu B, Zhang N, Liu D, Yuan XY (2018) Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Int J Ophthalmol 11(6):966–969. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.06.11
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.06.11
pubmed: 29977808
pmcid: 6010380
Nihalani BR, Vanderveen DK (2012) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in children less than two years. Am J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.017
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.017
pubmed: 22995562
Neely DE, Plager DA, Borger SM, Golub RL (2005) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010
pubmed: 16102495
O’Gallagher MK, Lagan MA, Mulholland CP, Parker M, McGinnity G, McLoone EM (2016) Paediatric intraocular lens implants: accuracy of lens power calculations. Eye (Basingstoke). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.163
doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.163
Vasavada V, Shah SK, Vasavada VA, Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH, Srivastava S, Vasavada SA (2016) Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes. Eye (Basingstoke) 30(9):1242–1250. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.171
doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.171
Maya E-T, Tsimhoni O, Archer SM, Del Monte MA (2007) Discrepancies between intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients. Ophthalmology 114(2):383–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.063
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.063
VanderVeen DK, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Bothun ED, McClatchey SK, Weakley DR, DuBois LG, Lambert SR (2012) Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: the infant aphakia treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 130(3):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.358
doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.358
pubmed: 22411658
pmcid: 3329400
Pingjun C, Lin L, Li Z, Wang Li, Huang J, Zhao Y-e (2020) Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258(5):1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04617-8
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04617-8
Kekunnaya R, Gupta A, Sachdeva V, Rao HL, Vaddavalli PK, Prakash VO (2012) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in children less than two years. Am J Ophthalmol 154(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.031
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.031
pubmed: 22336039
Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M (2009) Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye 23(1):149–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702954
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702954
pubmed: 17721503
Trivedi RH, Edward Wilson M, Reardon W (2011) Accuracy of the Holladay 2 intraocular lens formula for pediatric eyes in the absence of preoperative refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(7):1239–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.021
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.021
pubmed: 21549558
Sanders DR, Retzlaff J, Kraff MC (1988) Comparison of the SRK II™ formula and other second generation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 14(2):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80087-7
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80087-7
pubmed: 3351749