The impact of COVID-19 on otolaryngology research: a cross-sectional analysis of discontinued trials.


Journal

Journal of osteopathic medicine
ISSN: 2702-3648
Titre abrégé: J Osteopath Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101776472

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2022
Historique:
received: 29 11 2021
accepted: 09 03 2022
pubmed: 2 4 2022
medline: 5 8 2022
entrez: 1 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the capacity to conduct medical research due to recruitment difficulties, supply chain shortages, and funding deficits. The clinical practice of otolaryngology was especially impacted due to a reduction in elective procedures, such as facial plastic surgeries and vocal fold injections. The primary objective was to examine the extent of clinical trial (CTs) disruption secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic in the field of otolaryngology. On August 1, 2021, we conducted a systematic search utilizing ClinicalTrials.gov for CTs related to common otolaryngology disorders. We utilized the date range January 1, 2020 through August 1, 2021 to identify all trials potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigators performed screening and data extraction in a duplicate, masked fashion. Trials resulting from the search were extracted for trial status, condition treated, enrollment number, funding, study type, study design, last update posted date, and trial location. Trials that explicitly mentioned COVID-19 as a reason for discontinuation or suspension were coded as such. For trials that did not explicitly mention COVID-19, we coded the reason provided from ClinicalTrials.gov. The Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Institutional Review Board determined that this project did not qualify as human subject research. A total of 1,777 CTs met the inclusion criteria, and 223 CTs were discontinued between January 1, 2020 and August 1, 2021. Thirty-three (14.8%) of the 223 CTs reported discontinuation explicitly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 33 studies had 1,715 participants enrolled in total. Among the primary interventions, 11 (33.3%) were devices, 10 (30.3%) were drugs, 5 (15.2%) were behavioral, 4 (12.1%) were diagnostic tests, 1 (3.0%) was dietary, and 2 (6.1%) were labeled as "other." Regarding the CT location, 20 (60.6%) were conducted in the United States, and 13 (39.4%) were conducted internationally. Of the 33 CTs, 19 (57.6%) were suspended, 9 (27.3%) were terminated, and 5 (15.2%) were withdrawn. The overall most common reason for trial disruption was recruitment difficulties (24.2%). Median enrollment for discontinued trials due to COVID-19 was 37 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-71) and for other reasons was 6 (IQR, 0-27), for which the Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between the two (z=-3.913, p<0.001). There were no significant associations between trial location, funding source, randomization, or whether a study involved masked vs unmasked participants. The COVID-19 pandemic has incited an impact on clinical research in the field of otolaryngology. To preserve trial continuation amid future threats to participant interaction and communication, we recommend further exploration of remote monitoring practices and virtual procedures-those that will maintain the effectiveness and accuracy needed to establish novel therapeutics. We encourage future trials to gauge which remote assessments show the greatest validity, with the long-term goal of establishing innovative study designs resilient to future pandemics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35363445
pii: jom-2021-0278
doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0278
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

393-399

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Brayden M. Rucker et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Références

Ah-See, KW, Molony, NC. A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:460–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100140770.
Meltzer, EO, Hamilos, DL, Hadley, JA, Lanza, DC, Marple, BF, Nicklas, RA, et al.. Rhinosinusitis: developing guidance for clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:S31–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.09.014.
Asaad, M, Habibullah, NK, Butler, CE. The impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials. Ann Surg 2020;272:e222–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004113.
Desai, S, Manjaly, P, Lee, KJ, Li, SJ, Manjaly, C, Mostaghimi, A. The impact of COVID-19 on dermatology clinical trials. J Invest Dermatol 2021;141:676–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.032.
Upadhaya, S, Yu, JX, Hodge, J, Campbell, J. COVID-19 impact on oncology clinical trials: a 1-year analysis. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021;20:415. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-021-00086-8.
Moon, SJE, Dabbs, AD, Hergenroeder, AL, Vendetti, ML, Jones, KB, Willey, BM, et al.. Considerations for assessing physical function and physical activity in clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemp Clin Trials 2021;105:106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106407.
Center for Drug Evaluation, Research. Guidance for industry, investigators, and institutional review boards. Published 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-guidance-conduct-clinical-trials-medical-products-during-covid-19-public-health-emergency [Accessed 16 Jul 2021].
McGrath, BA, Brenner, MJ, Warrillow, SJ, Pandian, V, Arora, A, Cameron, TS, et al.. Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:717–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30230-7.
Wright, B, McKenna, C, Reddy, C. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-elective otolaryngology admissions and a positive change in clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021;103:496–8. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0100.
MacDonald, CW, Lonnemann, E, Petersen, SM, Rivett, DA, Osmotherly, PG, Brismée, JM. COVID 19 and manual therapy: international lessons and perspectives on current and future clinical practice and education. J Man Manip Ther 2020;28:134–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2020.1782059.
American Osteopathic Association. 95% of osteopathic physicians experienced a decline in practice revenue during pandemic. Published June 16, 2020. Available from:https://osteopathic.org/2020/06/16/40-of-physician-practices-lost-half-their-revenue-during-pandemic/ [Accessed 2 Mar 2022].
NIH. U. S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ [Accessed 15 Jul 2021].
Greenough, MC, Sajjadi, NB, Rucker, B, Vassar, M, Hartwell, M. The use of telecommunication and virtualization among ongoing and discontinued COVID-19 clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis. Contemp Clin Trials 2022;114: 106681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106681.
Sathian, B, Asim, M, Banerjee, I, Pizarro, AB, Roy, B, van Teijlingen, ER, et al.. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: a systematic review. Nepal J Epidemiol 2020;10:878–87. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v10i3.31622.
Xue, JZ, Smietana, K, Poda, P, Webster, K, Yang, G, Agrawal, G. Clinical trial recovery from COVID-19 disruption. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020;19:662–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00150-9.
Izmailova, ES, Ellis, R, Benko, C. Remote monitoring in clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Transl Sci 2020;13:838–41.
Deichmann, RE, Krousel-Wood, M, Breault, J. Bioethics in practice: considerations for stopping a clinical trial early. Ochsner J 2016;16:197–8.
Chalmers, I, Glasziou, P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1341–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c3020d.
Kasenda, B, von Elm, E, You, J, Blümle, A, Tomonaga, Y, Saccilotto, R, et al.. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA 2014;311:1045–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1361.
Blümle, A, Schandelmaier, S, Oeller, P, Kasenda, B, Briel, M, von Elm, E, et al.. Premature discontinuation of prospective clinical studies approved by a research ethics committee - a comparison of randomised and non-randomised studies. PLoS One 2016;11:e0165605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165605.

Auteurs

Brayden M Rucker (BM)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Nicholas B Sajjadi (NB)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Lacy S Brame (LS)

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Matt Vassar (M)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Micah L Hartwell (ML)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH