Radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer-a pattern of care survey among members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).
ENRT
Metastasis-directed therapy
OMPC
PSMA-PET/CT
Primary-directed therapy
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
14
11
2021
accepted:
02
03
2022
pubmed:
3
4
2022
medline:
23
7
2022
entrez:
2
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to improved imaging, oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is diagnosed more frequently. Growing evidence shows that patients with a limited number of metastases benefit from primary-directed radiotherapy (PDT) as well as from metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT). This survey investigates the current treatment practice for OMPC among German-speaking radiation oncologists. Members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie [DEGRO]) were surveyed regarding their current treatment practice via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by email. The survey included six general items and 14 specific items regarding treatment characteristics. Questionnaires with at least 50% of questions completed were considered for further analysis. A total of 204 responses were received (15% response rate), 167 were considered for further analysis. Most respondents stated to be specialized in treating prostate cancer patients and to treat 10-30 patients with OMPC per annum; 97% considered PSMA-PET/CT necessary to define oligometastatic disease. Opinions differed regarding the use of systemic therapies: 63% of the respondents aimed to defer systemic therapy using radiotherapy in OMPC, whereas 37% considered systemic therapy necessary. In the setting of synchronous OMPC, 97% recommended PDT with or without a combination of MDT and/or systemic therapy. For metachronous nodal or bone oligometastatic recurrence, 98 and 99%, respectively, would opt for MDT. The majority would combine MDT with systemic therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. Respondents recommended normofractionation, hypofractionation, and SBRT for lymph node metastases in 49, 27, and 24%, respectively. No consensus existed regarding the field size for MDT of lymph node metastases. Most respondents preferred > 5 fractions for treatment of bone metastases. Local radiotherapy for PDT and MDT is routinely used among respondents of this survey, representing 12% of all German-speaking radiation oncologists. The timing of systemic therapy, fractionation schedules, and field sizes are handled differently and remain an area of active investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35364690
doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01925-2
pii: 10.1007/s00066-022-01925-2
pmc: PMC9300519
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
727-734Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):325-34
pubmed: 25108577
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1014-1024
pubmed: 28283702
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 18;10:606260
pubmed: 33537236
Front Oncol. 2019 May 01;9:337
pubmed: 31119099
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Nov;196(11):1034-1043
pubmed: 32617620
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Feb;197(2):89-96
pubmed: 33301049
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):e18-e28
pubmed: 31908301
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):446-453
pubmed: 29240541
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):9-12
pubmed: 26189689
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:19-30
pubmed: 31507035
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):8-10
pubmed: 7799047
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Sep;197(9):1-23
pubmed: 34259912
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun 30;16(1):125
pubmed: 34193194
JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-659
pubmed: 32215577
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Mar;196(3):213-221
pubmed: 31559480
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jul;197(7):575-580
pubmed: 33914101
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):508-547
pubmed: 32001144
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Mar 9;16(1):50
pubmed: 33750437
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-2366
pubmed: 30355464
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):632-640
pubmed: 33419682
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1652-9
pubmed: 26951312
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):737-46
pubmed: 26244877
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jan;46(1):40-48
pubmed: 30267117
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):732-739
pubmed: 31331782
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 01;7(4):555-563
pubmed: 33599706
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:157-166
pubmed: 32388150
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0240892
pubmed: 33085712
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-2838
pubmed: 32484754