Effectiveness of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazil: a test-negative, case-control study.
Journal
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
revised:
15
02
2022
accepted:
15
02
2022
pubmed:
4
4
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
3
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
COVID-19 vaccines have proven highly effective among individuals without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, but their effectiveness in preventing symptomatic infection and severe outcomes among individuals with previous infection is less clear. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisation, and death for individuals with laboratory-confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using national COVID-19 notification, hospitalisation, and vaccination datasets from Brazil, we did a test-negative, case-control study to assess the effectiveness of four vaccines (CoronaVac [Sinovac], ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AstraZeneca], Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen], and BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNtech]) for individuals with laboratory-confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. We matched cases with RT-PCR positive, symptomatic COVID-19 with up to ten controls with negative RT-PCR tests who presented with symptomatic illnesses, restricting both groups to tests done at least 90 days after an initial infection. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to compare the odds of test positivity and the odds of hospitalisation or death due to COVID-19, according to vaccination status and time since first or second dose of vaccines. Between Feb 24, 2020, and Nov 11, 2021, we identified 213 457 individuals who had a subsequent, symptomatic illness with RT-PCR testing done at least 90 days after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection and after the vaccination programme started. Among these, 30 910 (14·5%) had a positive RT-PCR test consistent with reinfection, and we matched 22 566 of these cases with 145 055 negative RT-PCR tests from 68 426 individuals as controls. Among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection 14 or more days from vaccine series completion was 39·4% (95% CI 36·1-42·6) for CoronaVac, 56·0% (51·4-60·2) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 44·0% (31·5-54·2) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 64·8% (54·9-72·4) for BNT162b2. For the two-dose vaccine series (CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and BNT162b2), effectiveness against symptomatic infection was significantly greater after the second dose than after the first dose. Effectiveness against hospitalisation or death 14 or more days from vaccine series completion was 81·3% (75·3-85·8) for CoronaVac, 89·9% (83·5-93·8) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 57·7% (-2·6 to 82·5) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 89·7% (54·3-97·7) for BNT162b2. All four vaccines conferred additional protection against symptomatic infections and severe outcomes among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The provision of a full vaccine series to individuals after recovery from COVID-19 might reduce morbidity and mortality. Brazilian National Research Council, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, JBS, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and Generalitat de Catalunya.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
COVID-19 vaccines have proven highly effective among individuals without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, but their effectiveness in preventing symptomatic infection and severe outcomes among individuals with previous infection is less clear. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisation, and death for individuals with laboratory-confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS
Using national COVID-19 notification, hospitalisation, and vaccination datasets from Brazil, we did a test-negative, case-control study to assess the effectiveness of four vaccines (CoronaVac [Sinovac], ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AstraZeneca], Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen], and BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNtech]) for individuals with laboratory-confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. We matched cases with RT-PCR positive, symptomatic COVID-19 with up to ten controls with negative RT-PCR tests who presented with symptomatic illnesses, restricting both groups to tests done at least 90 days after an initial infection. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to compare the odds of test positivity and the odds of hospitalisation or death due to COVID-19, according to vaccination status and time since first or second dose of vaccines.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 24, 2020, and Nov 11, 2021, we identified 213 457 individuals who had a subsequent, symptomatic illness with RT-PCR testing done at least 90 days after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection and after the vaccination programme started. Among these, 30 910 (14·5%) had a positive RT-PCR test consistent with reinfection, and we matched 22 566 of these cases with 145 055 negative RT-PCR tests from 68 426 individuals as controls. Among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection 14 or more days from vaccine series completion was 39·4% (95% CI 36·1-42·6) for CoronaVac, 56·0% (51·4-60·2) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 44·0% (31·5-54·2) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 64·8% (54·9-72·4) for BNT162b2. For the two-dose vaccine series (CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and BNT162b2), effectiveness against symptomatic infection was significantly greater after the second dose than after the first dose. Effectiveness against hospitalisation or death 14 or more days from vaccine series completion was 81·3% (75·3-85·8) for CoronaVac, 89·9% (83·5-93·8) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 57·7% (-2·6 to 82·5) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 89·7% (54·3-97·7) for BNT162b2.
INTERPRETATION
All four vaccines conferred additional protection against symptomatic infections and severe outcomes among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The provision of a full vaccine series to individuals after recovery from COVID-19 might reduce morbidity and mortality.
FUNDING
Brazilian National Research Council, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, JBS, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and Generalitat de Catalunya.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35366959
pii: S1473-3099(22)00140-2
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00140-2
pmc: PMC8971277
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ad26COVS1
JT2NS6183B
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
791-801Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests MB-N reports grants from the Fazer o Bem Faz Bem programme from JBS. AIK reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, and Serimmune; and grants and personal fees from Tata Medical Devices, outside the submitted work. VdAO, VSB, MLB, JC, and MB-N are employees of Fiocruz, a federal public institution, which manufactures Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine) in Brazil through a full technology transfer agreement with AstraZeneca. Fiocruz allocates all its manufactured products to the Ministry of Health for public health use. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
BMJ. 2021 Sep 13;374:n2101
pubmed: 34518194
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7898):654-656
pubmed: 35016196
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jun;68:103401
pubmed: 34051441
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e423
pubmed: 34308395
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2487-2489
pubmed: 34818474
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:252-260
pubmed: 34800687
BMJ. 2021 Aug 20;374:n2015
pubmed: 34417194
Epidemiology. 2021 Jul 1;32(4):508-517
pubmed: 34001753
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):161-162
pubmed: 34176923
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):407-418
pubmed: 33460571
Lancet. 2022 Jan 1;399(10319):25-35
pubmed: 34942103
Immunity. 2021 Aug 10;54(8):1853-1868.e7
pubmed: 34331873
Epidemiology. 2022 Jul 1;33(4):450-456
pubmed: 35384900
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 20;:
pubmed: 35594552
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug;5(8):559-568
pubmed: 34119027
JAMA. 2021 Nov 16;326(19):1930-1939
pubmed: 34724027
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):398-399
pubmed: 34650240
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2127-2135
pubmed: 34650248
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;27(10):2595-2603
pubmed: 34314670
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 13;70(32):1081-1083
pubmed: 34383732
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e598-e609
pubmed: 33705690
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Jan;3(1):e21-e31
pubmed: 34778853
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1761-1773
pubmed: 34525277
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e545-e551
pubmed: 35380632
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 6;12(1):4144
pubmed: 34230476
Science. 2022 May 6;376(6593):eabn4947
pubmed: 35289632
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Feb;6:100154
pubmed: 34957437