Development and Testing of SPIDER-NET: An Interactive Tool for Brain Connectogram Visualization, Sub-Network Exploration and Graph Metrics Quantification.
MRI
brain connectivity
brain networks
connectograms
graph analysis
stroke
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
11
2021
accepted:
17
02
2022
entrez:
4
4
2022
pubmed:
5
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brain connectomics consists in the modeling of human brain as networks, mathematically represented as numerical connectivity matrices. However, this representation may result in difficult interpretation of the data. To overcome this limitation, graphical representation by connectograms is currently used via open-source tools, which, however, lack user-friendly interfaces and options to explore specific sub-networks. In this context, we developed SPIDER-NET (Software Package Ideal for Deriving Enhanced Representations of brain NETworks), an easy-to-use, flexible, and interactive tool for connectograms generation and sub-network exploration. This study aims to present SPIDER-NET and to test its potential impact on pilot cases. As a working example, structural connectivity (SC) was investigated with SPIDER-NET in a group of 17 healthy controls (HCs) and in two subjects with stroke injury (Case 1 and Case 2, both with a focal lesion affecting part of the right frontal lobe, insular cortex and subcortical structures). 165 parcels were determined from individual structural magnetic resonance imaging data by using the Destrieux atlas, and defined as nodes. SC matrices were derived with Diffusion Tensor Imaging tractography. SC matrices of HCs were averaged to obtain a single group matrix. SC matrices were then used as input for SPIDER-NET. First, SPIDER-NET was used to derive the connectogram of the right hemisphere of Case 1 and Case 2. Then, a sub-network of interest (i.e., including gray matter regions affected by the stroke lesions) was interactively selected and the associated connectograms were derived for Case 1, Case 2 and HCs. Finally, graph-based metrics were derived for whole-brain SC matrices of Case 1, Case 2 and HCs. The software resulted effective in representing the expected (dis) connectivity pattern in the hemisphere affected by the stroke lesion in Cases 1 and 2. Furthermore, SPIDER-NET allowed to test an
Identifiants
pubmed: 35368253
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.818385
pmc: PMC8968144
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
818385Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Coluzzi, Pirastru, Pelizzari, Cabinio, Laganà, Baselli and Baglio.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMC Neurosci. 2021 Aug 2;22(1):47
pubmed: 34340655
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):186-194
pubmed: 27631414
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Nov;50(5):1077-88
pubmed: 14587019
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
Brain Lang. 2014 Apr;131:65-73
pubmed: 23910928
Front Neurol. 2012 Feb 06;3:10
pubmed: 22363313
Brain. 2020 Apr 1;143(4):1233-1248
pubmed: 32252068
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):1-15
pubmed: 20547229
Brain Connect. 2020 Oct;10(8):399-410
pubmed: 32731752
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 28;5(10):e13701
pubmed: 21060892
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2013;:266-269
pubmed: 24953139
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 May;30(5):1511-23
pubmed: 18649353
Brain Commun. 2019 Oct 04;1(1):fcz020
pubmed: 32954263
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1340-51
pubmed: 22305988
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Jun;11(3):846-858
pubmed: 27289356
Neuroimage. 2010 Dec;53(4):1197-207
pubmed: 20600983
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
pubmed: 11771995
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349
pubmed: 29116093
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 04;8(7):e68910
pubmed: 23861951
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):161-9
pubmed: 20728543
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
pubmed: 19190637
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13040-5
pubmed: 19620724
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Sep;1(4):e42
pubmed: 16201007
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3653-62
pubmed: 23044278
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb 23;20(3):353-364
pubmed: 28230844
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1639-45
pubmed: 19541911
Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-41
pubmed: 22642651
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Nov 08;:
pubmed: 34748015
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4620-34
pubmed: 24639411
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1446-58
pubmed: 19781650
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Jun 04;11:134
pubmed: 31214017
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;11:497116
pubmed: 33061912
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:1063-1078
pubmed: 26481672
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 28;8(10):e77336
pubmed: 24204812
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Mar;54(3):462-72
pubmed: 17355058
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;93(10):913-6
pubmed: 24901762