Tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis in Scotland: a report on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology standards subgroup.
GCA
IL-6
temporal arteritis
ultrasonography
vasculitis
Journal
Rheumatology advances in practice
ISSN: 2514-1775
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Adv Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101736676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
12
2021
accepted:
22
02
2022
entrez:
4
4
2022
pubmed:
5
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim was to describe a modern National Health Service (NHS) Scotland cohort of patients with GCA over 12 months of care to include clinical presentation, practices relating to assessment and treatment, and specifically, the use of tocilizumab. A multicentre audit of patients newly diagnosed with GCA between November 2019 and October 2021 was established on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology. Clinical data were collected retrospectively by rheumatology teams at participating NHS centres using electronic patient records. An extended cohort of patients from NHS Lothian was examined to investigate outcomes of tocilizumab use for >1 year. Sixty-three patients from three NHS Scotland health boards were included, with analysis of data from 216 clinic episodes. Mean follow-up was 371 days. Mean age was 71 years; 62% were female. The most common presenting features were headache (93.6%), scalp tenderness (82.5%) and ocular symptoms (24%). At baseline, 63% of patients had at least one existing risk factor for adverse outcomes from high-dose CS use, namely hypertension (57.1%), diabetes (24%) and osteoporosis (11%). Thirty per cent of all patients (19 of 63) received tocilizumab, with only 11% (7 of 63) receiving tocilizumab owing to glucocorticoid risk factors at baseline. One-quarter of all patients (16 of 63) experienced relapse of GCA during follow-up, of whom six were subsequently treated with tocilizumab. This multicentre audit demonstrates that despite its availability for patients with risk factors for CS adversity and those who suffer relapse of GCA, tocilizumab is used in less than one-quarter of patients who might benefit. The reasons for this require further exploration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35368971
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac017
pii: rkac017
pmc: PMC8969593
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
rkac017Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Références
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):8
pubmed: 33407817
J Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;48(9):1435-1441
pubmed: 33589561
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 22;8:CD013484
pubmed: 34420204
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Mar 11;23(1):82
pubmed: 33706808
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 May 19;23(1):143
pubmed: 34011407
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):28
pubmed: 28245849
RMD Open. 2020 Sep;6(3):
pubmed: 32994361
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Mar 1;59(3):e1-e23
pubmed: 31970405
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1295-1304
pubmed: 32804186
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Jan;55(1):66-70
pubmed: 26286743
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Nov;20(90):1-238
pubmed: 27925577
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1921-7
pubmed: 26952547
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328
pubmed: 28745999
RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3):
pubmed: 33161376
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):126-135
pubmed: 30655091
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021 Mar-Apr;39 Suppl 129(2):155-160
pubmed: 33938796
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Aug;49(8):1594-7
pubmed: 20371504