Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomes.

Access Evaluation Telehealth Telemedicine

Journal

Health policy and technology
ISSN: 2211-8837
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Technol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597449

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 5 4 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
entrez: 4 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Telehealth use has surged since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the evaluation of telehealth outcomes and performance has not necessarily matched the pace of its uptake. In this article we aim to guide the design of a telehealth evaluation system encompassing all four domains of the outcome measurement framework developed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We aim to achieve this through proposing survey items that can be distributed to patients or clinicians as a questionnaire and providing suggestions on areas of focus for evaluation studies. Using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, we performed a literature review of articles related to the evaluation of telehealth outcomes that were published in English since 2000. We found existing survey tools to assist the development of an evaluation questionnaire, and categorized items into the four NQF outcome domains. For each outcome domain, we also summarize existing work on evaluation and make recommendations on areas for future assessment. In particular, we found that telehealth accessibility and accommodations have been historically under-studied and provide tools to address this. Evaluating telehealth outcomes is critical to ensure efficient and high-quality care delivery, and we believe establishing an evaluation system will help practices assess and improve their telehealth systems as well as their ability to use telehealth to respond to the diverse needs of patients. Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth use has been on the rise. Evaluating outcomes related to telehealth is critically important, but given the urgency of telehealth uptake, many health systems and practices may not yet have evaluation systems in place. This article guides the design of a telehealth evaluation system by proposing several validated and novel survey questions that can be used as part of a patient or clinician questionnaire and suggesting important measures of outcome for evaluation studies to assess across the four domains of telehealth quality as outlined by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We present tools to reach priority populations who often lack access to remote care, including older adults, underrepresented minorities, and people with disabilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35369128
doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100623
pii: S2211-8837(22)00029-6
pmc: PMC8957891
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100623

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K76 AG059983
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared

Références

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):44-51
pubmed: 22617736
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):571-573
pubmed: 32275485
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Dec;15(10):933-48
pubmed: 19954346
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 May;92:105939
pubmed: 31981712
Telemed J E Health. 2000 Winter;6(4):409-15
pubmed: 11242549
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):105-110
pubmed: 29661052
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 17;3(4):e75
pubmed: 25524892
Healthcare (Basel). 2014 Feb 12;2(1):74-93
pubmed: 27429261
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31):1-256
pubmed: 11809125
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 1;7(4):e11353
pubmed: 31682581
J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(1):46-50
pubmed: 12641893
Int J Telerehabil. 2016 Jul 01;8(1):3-10
pubmed: 27563386
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):713-720
pubmed: 27833678
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2060-2068
pubmed: 30633679
Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):41-52
pubmed: 34217399
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Dec 20;31:113
pubmed: 29951414

Auteurs

Melinda M Li (MM)

A.B. Candidate, Program in Liberal Medical Education, Brown University, Box 4743, 69 Brown St, Providence, RI, USA.

Kristin L Rising (KL)

MD MS, Associate Professor and Director of Acute Care Transitions, Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Elizabeth M Goldberg (EM)

MD, ScM, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine and Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Classifications MeSH