Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations.

L2 proficiency bilingualism concreteness frequency imageability

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 23 11 2021
accepted: 24 02 2022
entrez: 4 4 2022
pubmed: 5 4 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35369194
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702
pmc: PMC8968421
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

820702

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Altın, Okur, Yalçın, Eraçıkbaş and Aktan-Erciyes.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Am J Psychol. 2004 Fall;117(3):389-410
pubmed: 15457808
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):780-9
pubmed: 12613683
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Jun;113(2):256-81
pubmed: 6242753
Br J Psychol. 2002 Feb;93(Pt 1):89-114
pubmed: 11839103
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385
pubmed: 27553483
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1489-501
pubmed: 25220011
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):441-58
pubmed: 26501839
Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Dec;119(3):764-73
pubmed: 25456250
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):277-88
pubmed: 17662226
Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):113-39
pubmed: 8711012
Mem Cognit. 2020 May;48(4):511-525
pubmed: 31755026
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Nov;31(4):578-602
pubmed: 10633977
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):340-57
pubmed: 6242411
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1413-21
pubmed: 16861011
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(12):1664-8
pubmed: 11074089
Cognition. 2012 Dec;125(3):452-65
pubmed: 22935248
J Exp Psychol. 1971 Oct;90(2):227-34
pubmed: 5134329
J Vis. 2014 Oct 09;14(12):
pubmed: 25301015
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):850-5
pubmed: 18792515
Q J Exp Psychol. 1975 Aug;27(3):445-9
pubmed: 1196589
J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jan;76(1):Suppl:1-25
pubmed: 5672258
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1736-1746
pubmed: 27743317
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):157-68
pubmed: 21635291
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):29-44
pubmed: 34462893
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):23-32
pubmed: 20363469
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):449-58
pubmed: 21416306
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Feb;33(1):73-9
pubmed: 11296722
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Dec;54(4):274-325
pubmed: 11195718
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
pubmed: 24142837
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):349-65
pubmed: 25939978
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):546-57
pubmed: 19363197
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):946-72
pubmed: 23030642
J Mem Lang. 2008 Apr;58(3):787-814
pubmed: 19343088

Auteurs

Elif Altın (E)

Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Nurdem Okur (N)

Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Esra Yalçın (E)

Department of Psychology, 29 Mayıs University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Asude Firdevs Eraçıkbaş (AF)

Department of Translation and Interpreting Studies, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Aslı Aktan-Erciyes (A)

Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH