Neural Correlates of Executed Compared to Imagined Writing and Drawing Movements: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
cerebellum
kinematic writing parameters
motor imagery
premotor cortex
sensorimotor cortex
writing network
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
06
12
2021
accepted:
14
02
2022
entrez:
4
4
2022
pubmed:
5
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether motor imagery (MI) of handwriting and circle drawing activates a similar handwriting network as writing and drawing itself. Eighteen healthy right-handed participants wrote the German word " The kinematic analysis revealed a general correlation of handwriting parameters during sitting and lying except of pen pressure during drawing. Writing compared to imagined writing was accompanied by an increased activity of the ipsilateral cerebellum and the contralateral sensorimotor cortex. Executed compared to imagined drawing revealed elevated activity of a fronto-parieto-temporal network. By contrasting writing and drawing directly, executed writing induced an enhanced activation of the left somatosensory and premotor area. The comparison of the MI of these tasks revealed a higher involvement of occipital activation during imagined writing. The kinematic results pointed to a high comparability of writing in a vertical and horizontal position. Overall, we observed highly overlapping cortical activity except of a higher involvement of motor control areas during motor execution. The sparse difference between writing and drawing can be explained by highly automatized writing in healthy individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35370576
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.829576
pmc: PMC8973008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
829576Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Baumann, Tödt, Knutzen, Gless, Granert, Wolff, Marquardt, Becktepe, Peters, Witt and Zeuner.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AB received an intramural research grant from the Department of Neurology, Kiel. CM is the owner and author of the SCWin analysis software. KW served as a consultant for BIAL outside the present work. KZ has received research support from Strathmann and the German Research Council. She reports speaker’s honoraria from Bayer Vital GmbH, BIAL, AbbVie Allergan, and Merz outside the submitted work. She has served as a consultant and received fees from Merz, Ipsen, Alexion, and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 11;2:239
pubmed: 22013427
Brain Dev. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-8
pubmed: 7539228
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):491-501
pubmed: 10511638
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Sep;128(1-2):224-8
pubmed: 10473764
Mov Disord. 2012 Sep 15;27(11):1432-9
pubmed: 22328061
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1560-70
pubmed: 21907811
Behav Neurosci. 2005 Apr;119(2):622-6
pubmed: 15839808
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Nov;135(1):22-33
pubmed: 11104124
Behav Brain Res. 1996 May;77(1-2):45-52
pubmed: 8762158
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 02;8(7):e67931
pubmed: 23844132
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1201-10
pubmed: 18249421
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Mar;127(3):331-337
pubmed: 31901984
Prog Brain Res. 2005;148:151-64
pubmed: 15661188
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jan;35(2):309-22
pubmed: 22188383
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 1;32(4):1837-49
pubmed: 16872841
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):517-23
pubmed: 19531538
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;15(6):626-31
pubmed: 16271458
Neuroscientist. 2013 Feb;19(1):43-61
pubmed: 22547530
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 29;10:488
pubmed: 27746727
Eur J Neurosci. 1997 Feb;9(2):378-89
pubmed: 9058057
Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 May;13(1):34-42
pubmed: 11284045
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4067-81
pubmed: 21812571
Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Jan;12(1):1-19
pubmed: 11198101
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec;29(8):828-33
pubmed: 25377466
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:66-80
pubmed: 28081451
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Apr 1;131(1-2):163-8
pubmed: 11844583
Ann Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(4):537-45
pubmed: 19847902
Neuroreport. 2002 May 7;13(6):895-8
pubmed: 11997709
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Mar;34(3):613-25
pubmed: 22113948
Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):564-83
pubmed: 16399806
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):563-7
pubmed: 10448222
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 13;12:30
pubmed: 29487511
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):505-11
pubmed: 15778711
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May;117(5):1009-16
pubmed: 16516543
Brain. 1997 Apr;120 ( Pt 4):571-82
pubmed: 9153120
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1419-32
pubmed: 8584178
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Oct;12(2):337-40
pubmed: 11587904
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jun;37(5):930-49
pubmed: 23583615
J Neurosci. 2014 Jul 2;34(27):8999-9011
pubmed: 24990920
J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Apr;52(1):39-45
pubmed: 8090015
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:25-42
pubmed: 9056706
J Neurosci. 1988 Nov;8(11):4049-68
pubmed: 2846794
Brain Cogn. 2015 Aug;98:15-26
pubmed: 26051526
Cereb Cortex. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):102-19
pubmed: 8670643
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116189
pubmed: 31521825
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Apr;17(2):234-42
pubmed: 17317152
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 8;10(16):3315-9
pubmed: 10599838
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;79(1):117-25
pubmed: 9425182
J Neurosci. 2011 May 11;31(19):6972-81
pubmed: 21562259
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):271-5
pubmed: 20932984
J Magn Reson. 1998 Apr;131(2):272-85
pubmed: 9571103
Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1564-8
pubmed: 8703221
Brain. 2000 Feb;123 ( Pt 2):291-307
pubmed: 10648437
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jul;41(10):2642-2655
pubmed: 32090433
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Dec;5(6):727-32
pubmed: 8805419
Brain Res. 2016 Sep 1;1646:249-261
pubmed: 27288703
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 May;28(5):450-9
pubmed: 16944477
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2772-87
pubmed: 23831432