Uterine septum and reproductive outcome. From diagnosis to treatment. How, why, when?
Journal
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn
ISSN: 2032-0418
Titre abrégé: Facts Views Vis Obgyn
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 101578773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
entrez:
4
4
2022
pubmed:
5
4
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Septate uterus is a benign congenital malformation and represents the most common uterine anomaly in women with poor reproductive outcome. To review the available scientific data concerning the biological context of the intrauterine septum and the association with poor reproductive outcome, the best methods for diagnosis and treatment. From July 2020 to October 2020, we searched for relevant free full text articles in PubMed, written in English, and published from the 1st of January 2000 to 31st of July 2020. Association of the pathophysiology of septate uterus with poor reproductive outcome, evaluation of the different classification systems, the accuracy of diagnostic methods and the efficacy of the available treatment options. 259 articles were screened, and 22 articles were finally included in our study. Many theories regarding the pathophysiology of this congenital anomaly and its' association with reproductive problems have been proposed along the recent decades. Combination of diagnostic methods should be used to avoid misclassification of this congenital anomaly. Lack of uniformity in the different classification systems makes the diagnosis of septate uterus challenging as there is no universally accepted definition. Data regarding the reproductive outcome of women with septate uterus are still limited, thus recommendations regarding optimal treatment of these women are biased. According to new insights regarding the pathophysiology of the uterine septum, differences in the underlying embryological defects are associated with changes in the histological composition and vascularisation of septa, as well as in clinical significance.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Septate uterus is a benign congenital malformation and represents the most common uterine anomaly in women with poor reproductive outcome.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
To review the available scientific data concerning the biological context of the intrauterine septum and the association with poor reproductive outcome, the best methods for diagnosis and treatment.
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
From July 2020 to October 2020, we searched for relevant free full text articles in PubMed, written in English, and published from the 1st of January 2000 to 31st of July 2020.
Main outcome measures
UNASSIGNED
Association of the pathophysiology of septate uterus with poor reproductive outcome, evaluation of the different classification systems, the accuracy of diagnostic methods and the efficacy of the available treatment options.
Results
UNASSIGNED
259 articles were screened, and 22 articles were finally included in our study. Many theories regarding the pathophysiology of this congenital anomaly and its' association with reproductive problems have been proposed along the recent decades. Combination of diagnostic methods should be used to avoid misclassification of this congenital anomaly.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Lack of uniformity in the different classification systems makes the diagnosis of septate uterus challenging as there is no universally accepted definition. Data regarding the reproductive outcome of women with septate uterus are still limited, thus recommendations regarding optimal treatment of these women are biased.
What is new?
UNASSIGNED
According to new insights regarding the pathophysiology of the uterine septum, differences in the underlying embryological defects are associated with changes in the histological composition and vascularisation of septa, as well as in clinical significance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35373545
doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.1.002
pmc: PMC9612864
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
31-36Références
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):22-42
pubmed: 23312243
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):665-83
pubmed: 25444500
BJOG. 2019 Sep;126(10):1192-1199
pubmed: 31004459
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):1-14
pubmed: 10632403
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1:CD008576
pubmed: 28093720
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 May 21;8:52
pubmed: 20492650
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):761-71
pubmed: 21705770
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1675-8
pubmed: 15193494
Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):162-6
pubmed: 12525460
Gynecol Surg. 2013 Aug;10(3):199-212
pubmed: 23894234
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jul 1;35(7):1578-1588
pubmed: 32353142
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;19(3):229-37
pubmed: 17495638
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):178-84
pubmed: 23317507
Minerva Ginecol. 2020 Feb;72(1):36-42
pubmed: 32153162
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Oct 5;18(1):163
pubmed: 30290803
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-11
pubmed: 19744944
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):530-40
pubmed: 27235766
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jun;30(6):1323-30
pubmed: 25904634
Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2614-2621
pubmed: 27132053
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82
pubmed: 21830244
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2628-31
pubmed: 18571168
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep - Oct;27(6):1287-1294
pubmed: 31812613